Yolanda Natali Raico Gallardo, Banu Karayazgan, Eduardo Mukai, Claudio Peña Soto, Cortino Sukotjo, Gabriel Nima
{"title":"Accuracy of fused deposition modeling using biodegradable material: A comparative study with four resin-based additive manufacturing methods.","authors":"Yolanda Natali Raico Gallardo, Banu Karayazgan, Eduardo Mukai, Claudio Peña Soto, Cortino Sukotjo, Gabriel Nima","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) using a biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) material in comparison to four resin-based additive manufacturing methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A virtual maxillary arch was designed using a design software (DentalCAD, Exocad GmbH) and printed 10 times per group. Five additive manufacturing methods were used including: FDM, stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), liquid crystal display (LCD), and PolyJet (PJ). Fifty printed casts were scanned using an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona), and STL files were compared to the original design using a metrology software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems). The 3D analysis was performed on the overall cast and in the anterior, right posterior and left posterior regions. Trueness was determined by calculating the mean root mean square (RMS) value, while precision was assessed using the standard deviation of the RMS values. Color maps were used for visual analysis. The accuracy data did not meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance; therefore, a generalized linear model (GLM) was applied as a robust parametric alternative, followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PJ technology demonstrated the highest trueness among all groups (57.35 ± 17.73 µm) across all 3 anatomic regions (p < 0.05). FDM and SLA showed comparable trueness. The lowest trueness was observed in the DLP (163.37 ± 56.06 µm) and LCD groups (151.27 ± 52.36 µm). In terms of precision, PJ demonstrated the highest values among all groups (54.92 ± 16.89 µm) across all 3 anatomic regions (p < 0.05), followed by SLA and FDM groups, with no statistically significant difference between them. The lowest precision was observed in the DLP and LCD groups. Color displacement maps revealed larger deviations in the occlusal areas for DLP, SLA, and LCD groups, characterized by both expansion and shrinkage. FDM group showed a distinct pattern of shrinkage in the anterior zone and expansion in occlusal areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDM with biodegradable PLA demonstrated accuracy comparable to PJ and SLA, highlighting its potential as a sustainable alternative for dental cast fabrication.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Incorporating biodegradable materials into 3D printing offers a valuable step toward more eco-friendly and cost-effective dental additive manufacturing solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"105972"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) using a biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) material in comparison to four resin-based additive manufacturing methods.
Methods: A virtual maxillary arch was designed using a design software (DentalCAD, Exocad GmbH) and printed 10 times per group. Five additive manufacturing methods were used including: FDM, stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), liquid crystal display (LCD), and PolyJet (PJ). Fifty printed casts were scanned using an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona), and STL files were compared to the original design using a metrology software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems). The 3D analysis was performed on the overall cast and in the anterior, right posterior and left posterior regions. Trueness was determined by calculating the mean root mean square (RMS) value, while precision was assessed using the standard deviation of the RMS values. Color maps were used for visual analysis. The accuracy data did not meet the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance; therefore, a generalized linear model (GLM) was applied as a robust parametric alternative, followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons (p < 0.05).
Results: The PJ technology demonstrated the highest trueness among all groups (57.35 ± 17.73 µm) across all 3 anatomic regions (p < 0.05). FDM and SLA showed comparable trueness. The lowest trueness was observed in the DLP (163.37 ± 56.06 µm) and LCD groups (151.27 ± 52.36 µm). In terms of precision, PJ demonstrated the highest values among all groups (54.92 ± 16.89 µm) across all 3 anatomic regions (p < 0.05), followed by SLA and FDM groups, with no statistically significant difference between them. The lowest precision was observed in the DLP and LCD groups. Color displacement maps revealed larger deviations in the occlusal areas for DLP, SLA, and LCD groups, characterized by both expansion and shrinkage. FDM group showed a distinct pattern of shrinkage in the anterior zone and expansion in occlusal areas.
Conclusion: FDM with biodegradable PLA demonstrated accuracy comparable to PJ and SLA, highlighting its potential as a sustainable alternative for dental cast fabrication.
Clinical significance: Incorporating biodegradable materials into 3D printing offers a valuable step toward more eco-friendly and cost-effective dental additive manufacturing solutions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.