Physicochemical and Sensory Evaluation of Romanian Monofloral Honeys from Different Supply Chains.

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI:10.3390/foods14132372
Elena Daniela Bratosin, Delia Mirela Tit, Manuela Bianca Pasca, Anamaria Lavinia Purza, Gabriela Bungau, Ruxandra Cristina Marin, Andrei Flavius Radu, Daniela Gitea
{"title":"Physicochemical and Sensory Evaluation of Romanian Monofloral Honeys from Different Supply Chains.","authors":"Elena Daniela Bratosin, Delia Mirela Tit, Manuela Bianca Pasca, Anamaria Lavinia Purza, Gabriela Bungau, Ruxandra Cristina Marin, Andrei Flavius Radu, Daniela Gitea","doi":"10.3390/foods14132372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Honey quality and authenticity are influenced by floral origin, processing, and storage, with implications for composition and sensory appeal. This study offers a comparative assessment of eight monofloral honey samples, representing five botanical varieties: acacia, linden, rapeseed, lavender, and thyme. For acacia, linden, and rapeseed, both producer-sourced and commercial honeys were analyzed, while lavender and thyme samples were available only from local beekeepers. The botanical origin of each sample was confirmed using morphological markers of pollen grains. Physicochemical characterization included acidity, pH, moisture content, refractive index, hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF), proline concentration, and carbohydrate profiling by HPLC-RID. Acacia honey exhibited the lowest acidity and HMF levels, alongside the highest fructose/glucose (F/G) ratios, indicating superior freshness, lower crystallization risk, and a sweeter flavor profile. In contrast, rapeseed honey showed elevated glucose levels and the lowest F/G ratio, confirming its tendency to crystallize rapidly. All samples recorded proline concentrations well above the quality threshold (180 mg/kg), supporting their authenticity and proper maturation. The estimated glycemic index (eGI) varied between 43.91 and 62.68 and was strongly inversely correlated with the F/G ratio (r = -0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Sensory evaluation highlighted acacia honey from producers as the most appreciated across visual, tactile, and flavor attributes. Correlation analyses further revealed consistent links between sugar composition and both physical and sensory properties. Overall, the findings reinforce the value of integrated analytical and sensory profiling in assessing honey quality and authenticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132372","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Honey quality and authenticity are influenced by floral origin, processing, and storage, with implications for composition and sensory appeal. This study offers a comparative assessment of eight monofloral honey samples, representing five botanical varieties: acacia, linden, rapeseed, lavender, and thyme. For acacia, linden, and rapeseed, both producer-sourced and commercial honeys were analyzed, while lavender and thyme samples were available only from local beekeepers. The botanical origin of each sample was confirmed using morphological markers of pollen grains. Physicochemical characterization included acidity, pH, moisture content, refractive index, hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF), proline concentration, and carbohydrate profiling by HPLC-RID. Acacia honey exhibited the lowest acidity and HMF levels, alongside the highest fructose/glucose (F/G) ratios, indicating superior freshness, lower crystallization risk, and a sweeter flavor profile. In contrast, rapeseed honey showed elevated glucose levels and the lowest F/G ratio, confirming its tendency to crystallize rapidly. All samples recorded proline concentrations well above the quality threshold (180 mg/kg), supporting their authenticity and proper maturation. The estimated glycemic index (eGI) varied between 43.91 and 62.68 and was strongly inversely correlated with the F/G ratio (r = -0.98, p < 0.001). Sensory evaluation highlighted acacia honey from producers as the most appreciated across visual, tactile, and flavor attributes. Correlation analyses further revealed consistent links between sugar composition and both physical and sensory properties. Overall, the findings reinforce the value of integrated analytical and sensory profiling in assessing honey quality and authenticity.

来自不同供应链的罗马尼亚单花蜂蜜的理化和感官评价。
蜂蜜的质量和真实性受到花卉来源、加工和储存的影响,对成分和感官吸引力有影响。本研究提供了八种单花蜂蜜样品的比较评估,代表五种植物品种:金合欢、菩提树、油菜籽、薰衣草和百里香。对于金合欢、菩提树和油菜籽,分析了生产商采购的蜂蜜和商业蜂蜜,而薰衣草和百里香的样本只能从当地养蜂人那里获得。每个样品的植物来源通过花粉粒的形态标记加以确认。理化性质包括酸度、pH、水分含量、折射率、羟甲基糠醛(HMF)、脯氨酸浓度和HPLC-RID碳水化合物分析。金合欢蜂蜜的酸度和HMF水平最低,果糖/葡萄糖(F/G)比率最高,表明其新鲜度高,结晶风险低,风味更甜。相比之下,油菜籽蜂蜜的葡萄糖水平升高,F/G比最低,证实了其快速结晶的趋势。所有样品记录的脯氨酸浓度均远高于质量阈值(180 mg/kg),支持其真实性和适当成熟。血糖指数(eGI)在43.91 ~ 62.68之间变化,与F/G比值呈显著负相关(r = -0.98, p < 0.001)。感官评价强调了生产者的相思蜜在视觉,触觉和风味属性方面最受欢迎。相关分析进一步揭示了糖成分与物理和感官特性之间的一致联系。总的来说,这些发现加强了综合分析和感官分析在评估蜂蜜质量和真实性方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信