Nutritional and Organoleptic Characterization of Two Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Cultivars Grown in Quebec, Canada.

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2025-07-07 DOI:10.3390/foods14132394
Aria Haiying Huang, Sophie Turcot, Nancy Graveline, Marylène Pelletier, Hugues Plourde, Sébastien Villeneuve, Isabelle Germain
{"title":"Nutritional and Organoleptic Characterization of Two Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) Cultivars Grown in Quebec, Canada.","authors":"Aria Haiying Huang, Sophie Turcot, Nancy Graveline, Marylène Pelletier, Hugues Plourde, Sébastien Villeneuve, Isabelle Germain","doi":"10.3390/foods14132394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quinoa (<i>Chenopodium quinoa</i>) cultivation and consumption have been increasing globally for its nutritional value and agricultural adaptability, with over 120 countries involved in its production. In Canada, quinoa is cultivated as a specialty crop to increase crop diversity and support agroresilience. This study is the first to examine quinoa cultivars grown under northern Quebec conditions and to provide a nutritional and sensory characterization of two Quebec (Canada) varieties (Sweet and Bitter) in comparison to the Bolivian reference cultivar, Royal White. Analyses included proximate composition, amino acids, fatty acids, phenolics, and anti-nutrients. Sensory evaluations involved hedonic and bitterness ranking tests. Bolivian cultivar had higher omega-3 content, while the Quebec cultivars showed favorable protein and lipid profiles, with better lipid health indexes. Protein quality was comparable between the Bolivian and Sweet cultivars. The overall flavor appreciation was similar among twice-brushed Bitter cultivar and Bolivian samples. The Bolivian sample received a better score for texture. Descriptive flavor data support the development of a quinoa flavor lexicon. Notably, total saponins content, commonly used as a bitterness indicator, did not consistently correlate with perceived bitterness, emphasizing the need for a standardized quantification method for cultivar selection and further investigation into other flavor-contributing compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) cultivation and consumption have been increasing globally for its nutritional value and agricultural adaptability, with over 120 countries involved in its production. In Canada, quinoa is cultivated as a specialty crop to increase crop diversity and support agroresilience. This study is the first to examine quinoa cultivars grown under northern Quebec conditions and to provide a nutritional and sensory characterization of two Quebec (Canada) varieties (Sweet and Bitter) in comparison to the Bolivian reference cultivar, Royal White. Analyses included proximate composition, amino acids, fatty acids, phenolics, and anti-nutrients. Sensory evaluations involved hedonic and bitterness ranking tests. Bolivian cultivar had higher omega-3 content, while the Quebec cultivars showed favorable protein and lipid profiles, with better lipid health indexes. Protein quality was comparable between the Bolivian and Sweet cultivars. The overall flavor appreciation was similar among twice-brushed Bitter cultivar and Bolivian samples. The Bolivian sample received a better score for texture. Descriptive flavor data support the development of a quinoa flavor lexicon. Notably, total saponins content, commonly used as a bitterness indicator, did not consistently correlate with perceived bitterness, emphasizing the need for a standardized quantification method for cultivar selection and further investigation into other flavor-contributing compounds.

加拿大魁北克两种藜麦品种的营养和感官特性。
藜麦(Chenopodium Quinoa)因其营养价值和农业适应性在全球范围内的种植和消费不断增加,有120多个国家参与其生产。在加拿大,藜麦作为一种特殊作物种植,以增加作物多样性和支持农业抗灾能力。本研究首次考察了魁北克北部条件下种植的藜麦品种,并提供了魁北克(加拿大)两种藜麦品种(甜的和苦的)的营养和感官特征,并与玻利维亚参考品种皇家白藜麦进行了比较。分析包括近似成分、氨基酸、脂肪酸、酚类物质和抗营养素。感官评价包括享乐和苦味排序测试。玻利维亚品种的omega-3含量较高,而魁北克品种的蛋白质和脂肪含量较好,脂肪健康指数较好。玻利维亚品种和甜品种的蛋白质质量相当。在两次刷苦味品种和玻利维亚样品中,总体风味欣赏是相似的。玻利维亚的样品在质地方面得分更高。描述性风味数据支持藜麦风味词典的发展。值得注意的是,通常用作苦味指标的总皂苷含量与感知苦味并不一致,这强调了对品种选择和进一步研究其他风味贡献化合物的标准化量化方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信