Food Safety in Hydroponic Food Crop Production: A Review of Intervention Studies to Control Human Pathogens.

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2025-06-29 DOI:10.3390/foods14132308
Melanie L Lewis Ivey, Abigail Aba Mensah, Florian Diekmann, Sanja Ilic
{"title":"Food Safety in Hydroponic Food Crop Production: A Review of Intervention Studies to Control Human Pathogens.","authors":"Melanie L Lewis Ivey, Abigail Aba Mensah, Florian Diekmann, Sanja Ilic","doi":"10.3390/foods14132308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The production of hydroponic fresh produce presents unique food safety and intervention challenges. A systematic approach was used to map and characterize the evidence on hydroponic food safety. Quantitative data describing the effectiveness of intervention studies were extracted, synthesized, and assessed for quality. A search of electronic databases yielded 131 relevant papers related to hydroponic food safety. Thirty-two studies focusing on food safety interventions reported 53 different interventions using chemical (n = 39), physical (n = 10), multiple-hurdle (n = 2), and biological (n = 2) approaches. Human pathogen indicators and surrogates were most often studied (n = 19), while pathogenic strains like <i>Salmonella</i> spp. (n = 9), Shiga toxin-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> (STEC) (n = 5), <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> (n = 2), and viruses (Hepatitis A virus (HAV), n = 1; norovirus (NoV), n = 1) were studied less frequently. Of fourteen articles (43.8%) investigating pre-harvest interventions, most (42.9%) did not specify the hydroponic system type. Gaps remain in the available evidence regarding the efficacy of interventions for controlling human pathogens in near-commercial hydroponic systems. The quality assessment revealed a significant lack of detailed reporting on methods and outcomes, making it difficult to translate the findings into practical recommendations for the industry; therefore, this review provides recommendations for the scientific community to improve future research design and reporting in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production of hydroponic fresh produce presents unique food safety and intervention challenges. A systematic approach was used to map and characterize the evidence on hydroponic food safety. Quantitative data describing the effectiveness of intervention studies were extracted, synthesized, and assessed for quality. A search of electronic databases yielded 131 relevant papers related to hydroponic food safety. Thirty-two studies focusing on food safety interventions reported 53 different interventions using chemical (n = 39), physical (n = 10), multiple-hurdle (n = 2), and biological (n = 2) approaches. Human pathogen indicators and surrogates were most often studied (n = 19), while pathogenic strains like Salmonella spp. (n = 9), Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) (n = 5), Listeria monocytogenes (n = 2), and viruses (Hepatitis A virus (HAV), n = 1; norovirus (NoV), n = 1) were studied less frequently. Of fourteen articles (43.8%) investigating pre-harvest interventions, most (42.9%) did not specify the hydroponic system type. Gaps remain in the available evidence regarding the efficacy of interventions for controlling human pathogens in near-commercial hydroponic systems. The quality assessment revealed a significant lack of detailed reporting on methods and outcomes, making it difficult to translate the findings into practical recommendations for the industry; therefore, this review provides recommendations for the scientific community to improve future research design and reporting in this field.

水培粮食作物生产中的食品安全:控制人类病原体干预研究综述。
水培生鲜农产品的生产提出了独特的食品安全和干预挑战。采用系统的方法对水培食品安全的证据进行了绘制和表征。描述干预研究有效性的定量数据被提取、合成并评估其质量。在电子数据库中检索到131篇与水培食品安全相关的论文。32项关注食品安全干预措施的研究报告了53种不同的干预措施,使用化学(n = 39)、物理(n = 10)、多障碍(n = 2)和生物(n = 2)方法。研究最多的是人类病原体指示物和代物(n = 19),致病性菌株如沙门氏菌(n = 9)、产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(n = 5)、单核增生李斯特菌(n = 2)和病毒(甲型肝炎病毒(HAV), n = 1;诺如病毒(NoV, n = 1)的研究较少。在调查采收前干预措施的14篇文章(43.8%)中,大多数(42.9%)没有指定水培系统类型。关于在接近商业化的水培系统中控制人类病原体的干预措施的有效性,现有证据仍然存在差距。质量评估显示,对方法和结果的详细报告严重缺乏,因此很难将研究结果转化为对行业的实际建议;因此,本综述为科学界改进该领域未来的研究设计和报告提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信