Effects of Different Farming Models on Muscle Quality, Intestinal Microbiota Diversity, and Liver Metabolism of Rice Field Eel (Monopterus albus).

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2025-07-05 DOI:10.3390/foods14132383
Yifan Zhao, Wenzong Zhou, Muyan Li, Yuning Zhang, Weiwei Lv, Weiwei Huang, Hang Yang, Quan Yuan, Mingyou Li
{"title":"Effects of Different Farming Models on Muscle Quality, Intestinal Microbiota Diversity, and Liver Metabolism of Rice Field Eel (<i>Monopterus albus</i>).","authors":"Yifan Zhao, Wenzong Zhou, Muyan Li, Yuning Zhang, Weiwei Lv, Weiwei Huang, Hang Yang, Quan Yuan, Mingyou Li","doi":"10.3390/foods14132383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As consumer demand for quality fish products continues to rise, quality has become a key factor in market competition. Ecological aquaculture research is exploring various farming methods to balance high-quality demand with environmental protection. This study compared three aquaculture models-cage culture (CG), recirculating aquaculture (RAG), and rice-fish co-culture (RG)-by analyzing muscle quality (AOAC, GC-MS), intestinal microbiota (16S rRNA), and liver metabolism (LC-MS) to assess their effects on <i>M. albus</i>. In terms of muscle quality, the RG group showed increased levels of EPA and DHA, reduced muscle moisture and crude lipid content, and enhanced crude protein accumulation. The crude protein content was significantly higher in the RAG group than in the CG group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The RG group also had the highest levels of total, essential, and umami amino acids, followed by the RAG and CG groups. In terms of intestinal microbiota, the RG group had the highest microbial diversity and stability, with increased abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes and decreased levels of Proteobacteria. Compared to the CG, the RAG group also showed increased microbial diversity and a reduction in pathogenic genera. Liver metabolomics analysis demonstrated that the RG group had significant advantages over the CG group in amino acid, lipid, and energy metabolism. The RAG group exhibited upregulation of glycerophospholipid metabolism and a decrease in oxidative stress marker levels. Overall, the RG group enhanced muscle quality and optimized intestinal and liver metabolism in <i>M. albus</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12248573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14132383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As consumer demand for quality fish products continues to rise, quality has become a key factor in market competition. Ecological aquaculture research is exploring various farming methods to balance high-quality demand with environmental protection. This study compared three aquaculture models-cage culture (CG), recirculating aquaculture (RAG), and rice-fish co-culture (RG)-by analyzing muscle quality (AOAC, GC-MS), intestinal microbiota (16S rRNA), and liver metabolism (LC-MS) to assess their effects on M. albus. In terms of muscle quality, the RG group showed increased levels of EPA and DHA, reduced muscle moisture and crude lipid content, and enhanced crude protein accumulation. The crude protein content was significantly higher in the RAG group than in the CG group (p < 0.05). The RG group also had the highest levels of total, essential, and umami amino acids, followed by the RAG and CG groups. In terms of intestinal microbiota, the RG group had the highest microbial diversity and stability, with increased abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes and decreased levels of Proteobacteria. Compared to the CG, the RAG group also showed increased microbial diversity and a reduction in pathogenic genera. Liver metabolomics analysis demonstrated that the RG group had significant advantages over the CG group in amino acid, lipid, and energy metabolism. The RAG group exhibited upregulation of glycerophospholipid metabolism and a decrease in oxidative stress marker levels. Overall, the RG group enhanced muscle quality and optimized intestinal and liver metabolism in M. albus.

不同养殖模式对黄鳝肌肉品质、肠道菌群多样性和肝脏代谢的影响
随着消费者对优质鱼类产品的需求不断上升,质量已成为市场竞争的关键因素。生态水产养殖研究正在探索各种养殖方式,以平衡高品质需求和环境保护。本研究通过分析肌肉质量(AOAC, GC-MS)、肠道微生物群(16S rRNA)和肝脏代谢(LC-MS),比较了网箱养殖(CG)、循环水养殖(RAG)和稻鱼共养殖(RG)三种养殖模式,以评估它们对白螺旋体的影响。在肌肉质量方面,RG组EPA和DHA水平升高,肌肉水分和粗脂肪含量降低,粗蛋白质积累增加。RAG组粗蛋白质含量显著高于CG组(p < 0.05)。RG组总氨基酸、必需氨基酸和鲜味氨基酸含量最高,其次是RAG组和CG组。在肠道菌群方面,RG组的微生物多样性和稳定性最高,厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门的丰度增加,变形菌门的水平降低。与CG相比,RAG组还显示出微生物多样性的增加和致病属的减少。肝脏代谢组学分析表明,RG组在氨基酸、脂质和能量代谢方面明显优于CG组。RAG组甘油磷脂代谢上调,氧化应激标志物水平降低。总的来说,RG组提高了白螺旋体的肌肉质量,优化了肠道和肝脏代谢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信