Leveraging ChatGPT to strengthen pediatric healthcare systems: a systematic review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Hugo Douma, Courtney McNamara, Maria Bakola, David Stuckler
{"title":"Leveraging ChatGPT to strengthen pediatric healthcare systems: a systematic review.","authors":"Hugo Douma, Courtney McNamara, Maria Bakola, David Stuckler","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06320-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review is the first to investigate ChatGPT's applications in pediatric healthcare systems by assessing its accuracy and readability, with a focus on its impact across key areas such as clinical decision-making, clinical documentation, patient education, and training. The primary question guiding this review is: How does ChatGPT impact pediatric healthcare systems, for example, in terms of improving patient education, enhancing providers' efficiency, and assisting with clinical decision-making? A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (February 16, 2025). Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies evaluating ChatGPT in pediatric healthcare (ages 0-18 and guardians). Of 475 screened articles, 58 met eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, intervention types, outcomes, and results. ChatGPT's primary applications were patient education (n = 38), clinical decision-making (n = 12), and clinical documentation (n = 5). Accuracy was highest in patient education, where it generated educational materials and answered FAQs, though readability was often at a high school level, necessitating adaptation. Clinical documentation benefits included improved efficiency in drafting notes and discharge instructions. However, clinical decision-making and training (n = 3) showed mixed accuracy, particularly in management recommendations and patient care plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT demonstrates potential in enhancing physician efficiency and tailoring patient education in pediatric healthcare. However, most studies relied on observational designs, with only one quasi-experimental study. Further experimental research is required to evaluate AI's impact on pediatric care system effectiveness and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• AI has been increasingly integrated into pediatric healthcare, particularly in imaging, diagnostics, and decision support. • Prior studies have explored LLMs like ChatGPT in medical education and training.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• This is the first systematic review assessing ChatGPT's broader applications in pediatric healthcare, including decision-making, patient education, clinical documentation, and training. • ChatGPT shows high accuracy in patient education and documentation but variable performance in decision-making and training, emphasizing the need for medical supervision.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 8","pages":"478"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06320-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review is the first to investigate ChatGPT's applications in pediatric healthcare systems by assessing its accuracy and readability, with a focus on its impact across key areas such as clinical decision-making, clinical documentation, patient education, and training. The primary question guiding this review is: How does ChatGPT impact pediatric healthcare systems, for example, in terms of improving patient education, enhancing providers' efficiency, and assisting with clinical decision-making? A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (February 16, 2025). Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies evaluating ChatGPT in pediatric healthcare (ages 0-18 and guardians). Of 475 screened articles, 58 met eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, intervention types, outcomes, and results. ChatGPT's primary applications were patient education (n = 38), clinical decision-making (n = 12), and clinical documentation (n = 5). Accuracy was highest in patient education, where it generated educational materials and answered FAQs, though readability was often at a high school level, necessitating adaptation. Clinical documentation benefits included improved efficiency in drafting notes and discharge instructions. However, clinical decision-making and training (n = 3) showed mixed accuracy, particularly in management recommendations and patient care plans.

Conclusion: ChatGPT demonstrates potential in enhancing physician efficiency and tailoring patient education in pediatric healthcare. However, most studies relied on observational designs, with only one quasi-experimental study. Further experimental research is required to evaluate AI's impact on pediatric care system effectiveness and patient outcomes.

What is known: • AI has been increasingly integrated into pediatric healthcare, particularly in imaging, diagnostics, and decision support. • Prior studies have explored LLMs like ChatGPT in medical education and training.

What is new: • This is the first systematic review assessing ChatGPT's broader applications in pediatric healthcare, including decision-making, patient education, clinical documentation, and training. • ChatGPT shows high accuracy in patient education and documentation but variable performance in decision-making and training, emphasizing the need for medical supervision.

利用ChatGPT加强儿科医疗保健系统:系统回顾。
本系统综述首次通过评估ChatGPT的准确性和可读性来调查其在儿科医疗保健系统中的应用,重点关注其在临床决策、临床文档、患者教育和培训等关键领域的影响。指导本综述的主要问题是:ChatGPT如何影响儿科医疗保健系统,例如,在改善患者教育,提高提供者效率和协助临床决策方面?使用PubMed、EMBASE和Web of Science(2025年2月16日)进行系统评价。纳入标准包括同行评议的研究,评估ChatGPT在儿科保健(0-18岁和监护人)中的应用。在筛选的475篇文章中,58篇符合资格标准。两名独立评论者提取了研究特征、干预类型、结局和结果的数据。ChatGPT的主要应用是患者教育(n = 38)、临床决策(n = 12)和临床记录(n = 5)。准确性最高的是患者教育,它生成教育材料和回答常见问题,尽管可读性通常在高中水平,需要适应。临床文件的好处包括提高了起草笔记和出院说明的效率。然而,临床决策和培训(n = 3)的准确性参差不齐,特别是在管理建议和患者护理计划方面。结论:ChatGPT在提高儿科医疗保健的医生效率和定制患者教育方面具有潜力。然而,大多数研究依赖于观察设计,只有一项准实验研究。需要进一步的实验研究来评估人工智能对儿科护理系统有效性和患者预后的影响。•人工智能已越来越多地融入儿科医疗保健,特别是在成像、诊断和决策支持方面。•之前的研究已经探索了像ChatGPT这样的llm在医学教育和培训中的应用。创新之处在于:•这是第一个系统评价ChatGPT在儿科医疗保健中的广泛应用,包括决策、患者教育、临床文件和培训。•ChatGPT在患者教育和记录方面显示出很高的准确性,但在决策和培训方面表现不一,强调了医疗监督的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信