Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation as a Semi-Active Control Condition in TMS Clinical Trials: Evidence From Heart-Brain Coupling and Clinical Outcomes.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Martijn Arns, Nolan Williams, Jonathan Downar, Aleksandra Dojnov, John Coetzee, Roberto Goya-Maldonado
{"title":"Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation as a Semi-Active Control Condition in TMS Clinical Trials: Evidence From Heart-Brain Coupling and Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Martijn Arns, Nolan Williams, Jonathan Downar, Aleksandra Dojnov, John Coetzee, Roberto Goya-Maldonado","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The inertness of sham controls in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies, particularly those involving Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), remains controversial. Using heart-brain coupling (HBC) as a frontal-vagal engagement measure, we analyzed pilot data and data from two placebo-controlled accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) trials (combined N=100). Active-TMS induced significantly stronger HBC compared to sham in both studies, with the effect size for TENS-sham considerably attenuated, and significantly stronger HBC for TENS-sham relative to SAINT-sham (d=0.9). HBC in the TENS-sham group was associated with clinical improvement (d=1.12), reflecting antidepressant effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation. These findings suggest TENS-sham should be seen as a semi-active control condition, also controlling for trigeminal nerve stimulation, resulting in downstream vagal and cortical engagement and thus controlling for this non-specific effect of TMS. Future studies should be aware of this semi-active effect and conduct power-analyses accordingly, modifying the expected effect size. Furthermore, HBC could be used to titrate the intensity of TENS-stimulation to minimize semi-active effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inertness of sham controls in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies, particularly those involving Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), remains controversial. Using heart-brain coupling (HBC) as a frontal-vagal engagement measure, we analyzed pilot data and data from two placebo-controlled accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS) trials (combined N=100). Active-TMS induced significantly stronger HBC compared to sham in both studies, with the effect size for TENS-sham considerably attenuated, and significantly stronger HBC for TENS-sham relative to SAINT-sham (d=0.9). HBC in the TENS-sham group was associated with clinical improvement (d=1.12), reflecting antidepressant effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation. These findings suggest TENS-sham should be seen as a semi-active control condition, also controlling for trigeminal nerve stimulation, resulting in downstream vagal and cortical engagement and thus controlling for this non-specific effect of TMS. Future studies should be aware of this semi-active effect and conduct power-analyses accordingly, modifying the expected effect size. Furthermore, HBC could be used to titrate the intensity of TENS-stimulation to minimize semi-active effects.

三叉神经刺激作为经颅磁刺激临床试验的半主动控制条件:来自心脑耦合和临床结果的证据。
假性对照在经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究中的惰性,特别是那些涉及经皮神经电刺激(TENS)的研究,仍然存在争议。采用心脑耦合(HBC)作为额-迷走神经参与测量,我们分析了试验数据和两项安慰剂对照加速间歇性θ波爆发刺激(aiTBS)试验的数据(合并N=100)。在两项研究中,与假手术相比,激活tms诱导的HBC明显增强,而TENS-sham的效应量明显减弱,并且与SAINT-sham相比,TENS-sham的HBC明显增强(d=0.9)。TENS-sham组HBC与临床改善相关(d=1.12),反映了三叉神经刺激的抗抑郁作用。这些发现表明,TENS-sham应被视为一种半主动控制条件,也控制三叉神经刺激,导致下游迷走神经和皮层的接触,从而控制TMS的这种非特异性效应。未来的研究应该意识到这种半主动效应,并进行相应的功率分析,修改预期的效应大小。此外,HBC可用于滴定tens刺激强度,以减少半活性效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Stimulation
Brain Stimulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
256
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation. Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信