Impact of three sequential orthogeriatric care models on time to surgery after hip fracture: a retrospective study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Sabine Drevet, Jérôme Tonetti, Pierre Bouzat, Mehdi Boudissa, Jules Greze, Olga Fajfrova, Laure Allan-Pattoglia, Frederic Olive, Magali Bouisse, Bastien Boussat, Catherine Bioteau, Gaetan Gavazzi
{"title":"Impact of three sequential orthogeriatric care models on time to surgery after hip fracture: a retrospective study.","authors":"Sabine Drevet, Jérôme Tonetti, Pierre Bouzat, Mehdi Boudissa, Jules Greze, Olga Fajfrova, Laure Allan-Pattoglia, Frederic Olive, Magali Bouisse, Bastien Boussat, Catherine Bioteau, Gaetan Gavazzi","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06156-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In hip fracture, the interval between admission and surgery, referred to as time to surgery (TTS) influences prognosis. The main objectives of trauma management in older patients regardless of the orthogeriatric care model is to reduce the TTS between 24 and 48 h to improve outcomes. Our study aimed to assess the impact of orthogeriatric care models on TTS and patient outcomes in older patients with hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, retrospective, monocentric study divided into three sequential periods corresponding to three models of care implemented in a French Orthogeriatric unit from August 2015 to October 2021: Period 1 with a Geriatric Consultant Service in Orthopaedic Unit (GCS); Period 2 with an Integrated Orthogeriatric Care Model (ICM); Period 3 with an Integrated Orthogeriatric Care model with Anaesthetist (ICMA). The primary endpoint was the TTS assessed by the time elapsed from the emergency department admission to surgery start time in older patients with hip fracture (75 ≤ years old). The second objective was to assess the association of each model on patient outcomes: medical complications and health status at discharge. Comparisons between groups at baseline were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables or the Chi<sup>2</sup> test for nominal variables. The significative threshold was set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>490 patients (mean age, 88.2 years (SD, 5.8); female: 74.5%) were included: n = 147, 148, and 195 for GCS, ICM, and ICMA respectively. Comorbidity scores were more severe in ICMA. Median TTS was 52 h (IQR, 36-81), 53 h (24-98), and 44 h (25-67) for GCS, ICM, and ICMA respectively (p = 0.01). Regional nerve blocks were enhanced from 10.9% to 70.3% (p = < 0.001). Several in-hospital medical complications increased but delirium decreased in ICMA compared to GCS (p = 0.02). The mortality rate remained stable (5.5%). The length of stay did not differ between models. At discharge, 81.4% of patients from ICMA could walk at least 3 m.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TTS during the Integrated Orthogeriatric Care model with Anaesthetist decreased despite increased comorbidities and anticoagulation treatments. The model improved hip fracture management process and patient outcomes. Monitoring TTS is key to finding the optimal model, but strong professional values and structures are vital.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"515"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06156-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In hip fracture, the interval between admission and surgery, referred to as time to surgery (TTS) influences prognosis. The main objectives of trauma management in older patients regardless of the orthogeriatric care model is to reduce the TTS between 24 and 48 h to improve outcomes. Our study aimed to assess the impact of orthogeriatric care models on TTS and patient outcomes in older patients with hip fracture.

Methods: Observational, retrospective, monocentric study divided into three sequential periods corresponding to three models of care implemented in a French Orthogeriatric unit from August 2015 to October 2021: Period 1 with a Geriatric Consultant Service in Orthopaedic Unit (GCS); Period 2 with an Integrated Orthogeriatric Care Model (ICM); Period 3 with an Integrated Orthogeriatric Care model with Anaesthetist (ICMA). The primary endpoint was the TTS assessed by the time elapsed from the emergency department admission to surgery start time in older patients with hip fracture (75 ≤ years old). The second objective was to assess the association of each model on patient outcomes: medical complications and health status at discharge. Comparisons between groups at baseline were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables or the Chi2 test for nominal variables. The significative threshold was set at 0.05.

Results: 490 patients (mean age, 88.2 years (SD, 5.8); female: 74.5%) were included: n = 147, 148, and 195 for GCS, ICM, and ICMA respectively. Comorbidity scores were more severe in ICMA. Median TTS was 52 h (IQR, 36-81), 53 h (24-98), and 44 h (25-67) for GCS, ICM, and ICMA respectively (p = 0.01). Regional nerve blocks were enhanced from 10.9% to 70.3% (p = < 0.001). Several in-hospital medical complications increased but delirium decreased in ICMA compared to GCS (p = 0.02). The mortality rate remained stable (5.5%). The length of stay did not differ between models. At discharge, 81.4% of patients from ICMA could walk at least 3 m.

Conclusions: TTS during the Integrated Orthogeriatric Care model with Anaesthetist decreased despite increased comorbidities and anticoagulation treatments. The model improved hip fracture management process and patient outcomes. Monitoring TTS is key to finding the optimal model, but strong professional values and structures are vital.

三种顺序的骨科护理模式对髋部骨折后手术时间的影响:一项回顾性研究。
背景:在髋部骨折中,入院和手术之间的时间间隔,即手术时间(TTS)影响预后。无论采用何种骨科护理模式,老年患者创伤管理的主要目标是减少24至48小时的TTS以改善预后。我们的研究旨在评估骨科护理模式对老年髋部骨折患者TTS和患者预后的影响。方法:观察性、回顾性、单中心研究分为三个连续阶段,对应于2015年8月至2021年10月在法国骨科病房实施的三种护理模式:第一阶段在骨科病房(GCS)进行老年咨询服务;第二阶段综合骨科护理模式(ICM);第三期与麻醉师(ICMA)的综合骨科护理模式。主要终点是老年髋部骨折患者(75≤岁)从急诊科入院到手术开始时间的TTS评估。第二个目的是评估每个模型与患者结局的关系:医疗并发症和出院时的健康状况。组间基线比较采用连续变量的Kruskal-Wallis检验或名义变量的Chi2检验。显著性阈值设为0.05。结果:490例患者,平均年龄88.2岁(SD, 5.8);女性:74.5%),GCS、ICM和ICMA分别纳入n = 147、148和195例。ICMA组的合并症评分更为严重。GCS、ICM和ICMA的中位TTS分别为52 h (IQR, 36-81)、53 h(24-98)和44 h (25-67) (p = 0.01)。区域神经阻滞从10.9%增加到70.3% (p =结论:在麻醉师的综合骨科护理模式下,TTS降低,尽管合合症和抗凝治疗增加。该模型改善了髋部骨折的治疗过程和患者的预后。监测TTS是找到最佳模型的关键,但强大的专业价值观和结构至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信