Does high frequency exercise or electrical muscle stimulation improve strength and function in non-weight bearing, older patients? The PAIVE pilot randomised trial.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Kelly L Fleury, Lucy Troup, Andrew Mangan, Rita Kinsella, Gustavo Duque, Bethany Knowles, Catherine Davey, Kimberley J Haines, Catherine M Said
{"title":"Does high frequency exercise or electrical muscle stimulation improve strength and function in non-weight bearing, older patients? The PAIVE pilot randomised trial.","authors":"Kelly L Fleury, Lucy Troup, Andrew Mangan, Rita Kinsella, Gustavo Duque, Bethany Knowles, Catherine Davey, Kimberley J Haines, Catherine M Said","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-06161-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older patients who are non-weightbearing/touch-weightbearing (NWB/TWB) following a lower limb fracture often receive limited physiotherapy until this restriction is removed. It is unknown whether interventions such as higher frequency exercise or Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) effectively maintain quadriceps strength and patient function. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to evaluate the feasibility of delivering two alternative interventions and obtaining selected outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four people with a lower limb fracture and NWB/TWB restriction were recruited on admission to a subacute ward at Western Health (a major metropolitan public health service in Melbourne). Participants were randomly allocated to receive either low frequency physiotherapy (n = 8), high frequency physiotherapy (n = 8) or NMES (n = 8). Interventions were delivered during the NWB/TWB phase. The primary outcomes were trial feasibility and safety; determined by adverse events. Quadriceps strength (assessed using a dynamometer), and function were measured at baseline, completion of NWB/TWB restriction, and on hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment was paused twice due to the COVID-19 pandemic: 145 people were screened; 43 eligible and 24 recruited. Retention rate was high, with only two participants withdrawing due to acute medical reasons. Twenty-one out of 24 participants successfully completed their intervention sessions, with 91% of scheduled sessions delivered. Outcome measurement completion was 100% at baseline, 83% at completion of NWB/TWB restriction, and 83% on hospital discharge. While the study was not powered to determine effectiveness, the high frequency and NMES groups demonstrated higher ratios of quadriceps strength (affected / unaffected limb); compared to the low frequency group at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The trial protocol was feasible and safe. Results indicate there is a potential for high frequency exercise or NMES to be more effective at maintaining muscle strength compared to low frequency exercise. A fully powered randomised controlled trial to explore the effectiveness and cost of these interventions is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12254973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06161-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older patients who are non-weightbearing/touch-weightbearing (NWB/TWB) following a lower limb fracture often receive limited physiotherapy until this restriction is removed. It is unknown whether interventions such as higher frequency exercise or Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) effectively maintain quadriceps strength and patient function. The primary aim of this pilot trial was to evaluate the feasibility of delivering two alternative interventions and obtaining selected outcome measures.

Methods: Twenty-four people with a lower limb fracture and NWB/TWB restriction were recruited on admission to a subacute ward at Western Health (a major metropolitan public health service in Melbourne). Participants were randomly allocated to receive either low frequency physiotherapy (n = 8), high frequency physiotherapy (n = 8) or NMES (n = 8). Interventions were delivered during the NWB/TWB phase. The primary outcomes were trial feasibility and safety; determined by adverse events. Quadriceps strength (assessed using a dynamometer), and function were measured at baseline, completion of NWB/TWB restriction, and on hospital discharge.

Results: Recruitment was paused twice due to the COVID-19 pandemic: 145 people were screened; 43 eligible and 24 recruited. Retention rate was high, with only two participants withdrawing due to acute medical reasons. Twenty-one out of 24 participants successfully completed their intervention sessions, with 91% of scheduled sessions delivered. Outcome measurement completion was 100% at baseline, 83% at completion of NWB/TWB restriction, and 83% on hospital discharge. While the study was not powered to determine effectiveness, the high frequency and NMES groups demonstrated higher ratios of quadriceps strength (affected / unaffected limb); compared to the low frequency group at discharge.

Conclusion: The trial protocol was feasible and safe. Results indicate there is a potential for high frequency exercise or NMES to be more effective at maintaining muscle strength compared to low frequency exercise. A fully powered randomised controlled trial to explore the effectiveness and cost of these interventions is warranted.

高频运动或肌肉电刺激是否能改善老年非负重患者的力量和功能?PAIVE试点随机试验。
背景:下肢骨折后非负重/触摸负重(NWB/TWB)的老年患者通常接受有限的物理治疗,直到该限制解除。目前尚不清楚高频运动或神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)等干预措施是否能有效维持股四头肌力量和患者功能。该试点试验的主要目的是评估提供两种替代干预措施和获得选定结果测量的可行性。方法:在Western Health(墨尔本主要的大都市公共卫生服务机构)的亚急性病房招募24名下肢骨折和NWB/TWB限制的患者。参与者被随机分配接受低频物理治疗(n = 8)、高频物理治疗(n = 8)或NMES (n = 8)。干预措施在NWB/TWB阶段实施。主要结局是试验的可行性和安全性;由不良事件决定。在基线、完成NWB/TWB限制和出院时测量股四头肌力量(使用测力仪评估)和功能。结果:因COVID-19大流行暂停招募两次:筛查145人;43人符合条件,24人获聘。保留率很高,只有两名参与者因严重的医疗原因退出。24名参与者中有21人成功完成了他们的干预课程,91%的计划课程如期完成。结果测量的完成度在基线时为100%,在完成NWB/TWB限制时为83%,出院时为83%。虽然该研究无法确定有效性,但高频组和NMES组显示出更高的股四头肌力量比率(受影响/未受影响的肢体);在放电时与低频组比较。结论:试验方案可行、安全。结果表明,与低频运动相比,高频运动或NMES在维持肌肉力量方面可能更有效。有必要进行一项完全随机对照试验,以探讨这些干预措施的有效性和成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信