Addressing data sharing challenges for leakage management in water distribution networks - An MCDM-based assessment of barriers and solutions.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126481
Ruoqing Yin, Haonan Xu, Jiaqian Wei, Liz Varga
{"title":"Addressing data sharing challenges for leakage management in water distribution networks - An MCDM-based assessment of barriers and solutions.","authors":"Ruoqing Yin, Haonan Xu, Jiaqian Wei, Liz Varga","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Around 20 percent of drinking water is lost through leakage in the UK's water distribution system with serious economic, environmental and social consequences. Accurate and timely data are essential for both data-driven and model-based approaches to leakage detection. Key research gaps include the lack of comprehensive identification of data-sharing barriers and solutions, the absence of tailored data standards for leakage management, and the need for a holistic framework to assess benefits and prioritize barriers need to be solved. To address these gaps, this study employs a semi-structured interview approach with 7 experts in the UK water sector to identify key barriers and solutions. Additionally, Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods, along with the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) technique, are used to assess the identified barriers and solutions. The contributions of this study include a comprehensive data description of water leakage, the identification of 22 barriers categorized into five groups-legal, collaboration, commercial, cultural, and technical-and 19 solutions classified into six categories-regulatory, collaboration, trust-building, technical, training, and sustainability. Using the CRITIC-MCDM approach, each barrier and solution is assigned a prioritization score. The findings reveal that collaboration, cultural, and technical barriers emerged as the most significant obstacles to data sharing. In contrast, technical, training, and trust-based solutions emerged as the most impactful enablers, with measures like advanced technology adoption and sensitive data protection scoring highest. To ensure effective implementation and mitigate potential risks, we emphasize the need to apply a system thinking approach that considers the interdependencies among these high-impact solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"391 ","pages":"126481"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126481","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around 20 percent of drinking water is lost through leakage in the UK's water distribution system with serious economic, environmental and social consequences. Accurate and timely data are essential for both data-driven and model-based approaches to leakage detection. Key research gaps include the lack of comprehensive identification of data-sharing barriers and solutions, the absence of tailored data standards for leakage management, and the need for a holistic framework to assess benefits and prioritize barriers need to be solved. To address these gaps, this study employs a semi-structured interview approach with 7 experts in the UK water sector to identify key barriers and solutions. Additionally, Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods, along with the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) technique, are used to assess the identified barriers and solutions. The contributions of this study include a comprehensive data description of water leakage, the identification of 22 barriers categorized into five groups-legal, collaboration, commercial, cultural, and technical-and 19 solutions classified into six categories-regulatory, collaboration, trust-building, technical, training, and sustainability. Using the CRITIC-MCDM approach, each barrier and solution is assigned a prioritization score. The findings reveal that collaboration, cultural, and technical barriers emerged as the most significant obstacles to data sharing. In contrast, technical, training, and trust-based solutions emerged as the most impactful enablers, with measures like advanced technology adoption and sensitive data protection scoring highest. To ensure effective implementation and mitigate potential risks, we emphasize the need to apply a system thinking approach that considers the interdependencies among these high-impact solutions.

解决供水管网泄漏管理的数据共享挑战——基于mcdm的障碍和解决方案评估。
大约20%的饮用水由于英国供水系统的泄漏而流失,造成了严重的经济、环境和社会后果。准确和及时的数据对于数据驱动和基于模型的泄漏检测方法都至关重要。主要的研究差距包括缺乏对数据共享障碍和解决方案的全面识别,缺乏针对泄漏管理的量身定制的数据标准,以及需要一个整体框架来评估效益和优先考虑需要解决的障碍。为了解决这些差距,本研究采用半结构化访谈方法,与英国水务部门的7位专家一起确定主要障碍和解决方案。此外,多标准决策(MCDM)方法,以及通过标准间相关性(CRITIC)技术的标准重要性,用于评估已识别的障碍和解决方案。本研究的贡献包括对漏水进行了全面的数据描述,确定了22个障碍,分为五类——法律、合作、商业、文化和技术,以及19个解决方案,分为六类——监管、合作、信任建立、技术、培训和可持续性。使用critical - mcdm方法,为每个障碍和解决方案分配一个优先级分数。研究结果显示,协作、文化和技术障碍成为数据共享的最大障碍。相比之下,技术、培训和基于信任的解决方案成为最具影响力的推动因素,先进技术采用和敏感数据保护等措施得分最高。为了确保有效实施和降低潜在风险,我们强调需要采用系统思维方法,考虑这些高影响力解决方案之间的相互依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信