Relationship between medication use and non-attendance (missed appointment) from primary care visits among people with type 2 diabetes: The Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial-2 Large-Scale Trial 006 (J-DOIT2-LT006).

IF 3.2 3区 医学
Yusuke Hikima, Ryotaro Bouchi, Yasuaki Hayashino, Atsushi Goto, Hikari Suzuki, Katsuya Yamazaki, Kazuo Izumi, Masaomi Nangaku, Mitsuhiko Noda
{"title":"Relationship between medication use and non-attendance (missed appointment) from primary care visits among people with type 2 diabetes: The Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial-2 Large-Scale Trial 006 (J-DOIT2-LT006).","authors":"Yusuke Hikima, Ryotaro Bouchi, Yasuaki Hayashino, Atsushi Goto, Hikari Suzuki, Katsuya Yamazaki, Kazuo Izumi, Masaomi Nangaku, Mitsuhiko Noda","doi":"10.1111/jdi.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/introduction: </strong>To clarify the relationship between medication use and primary care visit non-attendance (missed appointment) among people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data of 2,200 patients registered in the Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial-2 Large-Scale trial were reviewed. The intervention group received multifaceted interventions encouraging regular visits. The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of oral medications relative to not taking any oral medications were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for district medical association ID, intervention, insulin usage, age, sex, and HbA1c. We also investigated whether the HRs differed based on the oral medication type. Furthermore, we divided the intervention and control groups into four groups based on medication use (taking/not taking oral medications and insulin therapy) and performed survival analysis for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HRs (95% CI) for oral medication use relative to not taking oral medications and for insulin use relative to not receiving insulin therapy were 0.178 (0.104-0.305) and 0.725 (0.378-1.352), respectively. Regardless of the type of oral medication, non-attendance was lower in the groups taking oral medications. The HRs (95% CI) in the groups taking only oral hypoglycemic agents, only other drugs, and both relative to no oral medication were 0.229 (0.126-0.417), 0.235 (0.112-0.494), and 0.148 (0.084-0.260), respectively. Only in the control group, non-attendance was more frequent with no medications than with oral medications, regardless of insulin (P < 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that taking oral medications might be important to prevent non-attendance among people with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.70121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/introduction: To clarify the relationship between medication use and primary care visit non-attendance (missed appointment) among people with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods: Data of 2,200 patients registered in the Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial-2 Large-Scale trial were reviewed. The intervention group received multifaceted interventions encouraging regular visits. The hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of oral medications relative to not taking any oral medications were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for district medical association ID, intervention, insulin usage, age, sex, and HbA1c. We also investigated whether the HRs differed based on the oral medication type. Furthermore, we divided the intervention and control groups into four groups based on medication use (taking/not taking oral medications and insulin therapy) and performed survival analysis for each group.

Results: The HRs (95% CI) for oral medication use relative to not taking oral medications and for insulin use relative to not receiving insulin therapy were 0.178 (0.104-0.305) and 0.725 (0.378-1.352), respectively. Regardless of the type of oral medication, non-attendance was lower in the groups taking oral medications. The HRs (95% CI) in the groups taking only oral hypoglycemic agents, only other drugs, and both relative to no oral medication were 0.229 (0.126-0.417), 0.235 (0.112-0.494), and 0.148 (0.084-0.260), respectively. Only in the control group, non-attendance was more frequent with no medications than with oral medications, regardless of insulin (P < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that taking oral medications might be important to prevent non-attendance among people with type 2 diabetes.

2型糖尿病患者用药与未出席(错过预约)初级保健就诊之间的关系:日本糖尿病结局干预试验-2大规模试验006 (J-DOIT2-LT006)
目的/简介:阐明2型糖尿病患者用药与初级保健不出席(错过预约)之间的关系。材料和方法:回顾日本糖尿病结局干预试验-2大规模试验中登记的2200例患者的数据。干预组接受多方面的干预,鼓励定期访问。使用Cox比例风险模型估计口服药物相对于不服用任何口服药物的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),并根据地区医学协会ID、干预措施、胰岛素使用、年龄、性别和HbA1c进行调整。我们还调查了不同口服药物类型的hr是否存在差异。根据用药情况(服用/不服用口服药物及胰岛素治疗)将干预组和对照组分为4组,并对每组患者进行生存分析。结果:使用口服药物与不服用口服药物的hr (95% CI)和使用胰岛素与不接受胰岛素治疗的hr (95% CI)分别为0.178(0.104 ~ 0.305)和0.725(0.378 ~ 1.352)。无论口服药物的类型如何,服用口服药物的组缺勤率较低。仅口服降糖药组、仅使用其他药物组和两者相对于不口服降糖药组的hr (95% CI)分别为0.229(0.126 ~ 0.417)、0.235(0.112 ~ 0.494)和0.148(0.084 ~ 0.260)。只有在对照组中,不服用药物的缺勤率高于口服药物的缺勤率,而不考虑胰岛素(P结论:我们的研究结果表明,口服药物可能对预防2型糖尿病患者缺勤很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Journal of Diabetes Investigation Medicine-Internal Medicine
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Investigation is your core diabetes journal from Asia; the official journal of the Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD). The journal publishes original research, country reports, commentaries, reviews, mini-reviews, case reports, letters, as well as editorials and news. Embracing clinical and experimental research in diabetes and related areas, the Journal of Diabetes Investigation includes aspects of prevention, treatment, as well as molecular aspects and pathophysiology. Translational research focused on the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers is also welcome. Journal of Diabetes Investigation is indexed by Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信