Impact of Behavioral Changes in Motor Function Measurement on Presenteeism: A Prospective Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Masakazu Imaoka, Mitsumasa Hida, Satoshi Okahara, Yuriko Yoshino, Noboru Fujita, Kotoko Nagai, Takuya Sekiguchi
{"title":"Impact of Behavioral Changes in Motor Function Measurement on Presenteeism: A Prospective Study","authors":"Masakazu Imaoka,&nbsp;Mitsumasa Hida,&nbsp;Satoshi Okahara,&nbsp;Yuriko Yoshino,&nbsp;Noboru Fujita,&nbsp;Kotoko Nagai,&nbsp;Takuya Sekiguchi","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Employees often cannot monitor their locomotor status or measure physical and motor functions during working hours owing to time constraints. This study aimed to examine whether presenteeism can be improved through repetitive motor function measurements and individual feedback provided by professionals and company employees.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants underwent motor function measurements and completed a self-administered questionnaire. Presenteeism was assessed using the Single-Item Presenteeism Questionnaire (SPQ). Body composition was measured using the bioimpedance method to determine limb skeletal muscle mass, which was divided by height to calculate the Skeletal Muscle Mass Index. Dynamic balance capacity was evaluated using the two-step test, grip strength, and finger floor distance (FFD)—all individually measured by a physiotherapist. A self-administered questionnaire assessed the presence of pain and lifestyle habits. Repeat measurements were conducted 6 months later using the same test items and assessments of lifestyle and exercise statuses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 134 participants (aged 18–67 years), 70 (52.2%) completed the repeated measurements and were included in the analysis. The SPQ score improved from 13.1 ± 13.6% in the pre-survey to 10.7 ± 12.6% in the post-survey, indicating a trend of a 2.4% improvement. Regarding motor function, FFD demonstrated a significant improvement in flexibility, increasing from 3.1 ± 9.5 cm pre-survey to 4.6 ± 9.6 cm post-survey, with an average increase of 1.5 cm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A behavioral change approach based on motor function measurements in employees significantly improved flexibility and showed a trend toward improved SPQ scores. Furthermore, the behavioral change group that initiated exercise demonstrated significant improvements in flexibility.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.71059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Employees often cannot monitor their locomotor status or measure physical and motor functions during working hours owing to time constraints. This study aimed to examine whether presenteeism can be improved through repetitive motor function measurements and individual feedback provided by professionals and company employees.

Methods

Participants underwent motor function measurements and completed a self-administered questionnaire. Presenteeism was assessed using the Single-Item Presenteeism Questionnaire (SPQ). Body composition was measured using the bioimpedance method to determine limb skeletal muscle mass, which was divided by height to calculate the Skeletal Muscle Mass Index. Dynamic balance capacity was evaluated using the two-step test, grip strength, and finger floor distance (FFD)—all individually measured by a physiotherapist. A self-administered questionnaire assessed the presence of pain and lifestyle habits. Repeat measurements were conducted 6 months later using the same test items and assessments of lifestyle and exercise statuses.

Results

Of the 134 participants (aged 18–67 years), 70 (52.2%) completed the repeated measurements and were included in the analysis. The SPQ score improved from 13.1 ± 13.6% in the pre-survey to 10.7 ± 12.6% in the post-survey, indicating a trend of a 2.4% improvement. Regarding motor function, FFD demonstrated a significant improvement in flexibility, increasing from 3.1 ± 9.5 cm pre-survey to 4.6 ± 9.6 cm post-survey, with an average increase of 1.5 cm.

Conclusion

A behavioral change approach based on motor function measurements in employees significantly improved flexibility and showed a trend toward improved SPQ scores. Furthermore, the behavioral change group that initiated exercise demonstrated significant improvements in flexibility.

Abstract Image

运动功能测量中行为改变对出勤的影响:一项前瞻性研究
背景和目的由于时间限制,员工在工作时间往往无法监测自己的运动状态或测量身体和运动功能。本研究旨在探讨是否可以通过重复性运动功能测量和专业人员和公司员工提供的个人反馈来改善出勤。方法对参与者进行运动功能测量,并完成自我管理问卷。使用单项出勤问卷(SPQ)评估出勤情况。身体组成采用生物阻抗法测定肢体骨骼肌质量,骨骼肌质量除以身高计算骨骼肌质量指数。动态平衡能力通过两步测试、握力和指底距离(FFD)进行评估,这些都是由物理治疗师单独测量的。一份自我管理的问卷评估了疼痛的存在和生活习惯。6个月后使用相同的测试项目进行重复测量,评估生活方式和运动状态。结果134名参与者(18-67岁)中,70名(52.2%)完成了重复测量并纳入分析。SPQ得分由调查前的13.1±13.6%提高到调查后的10.7±12.6%,改善幅度为2.4%。在运动功能方面,FFD显示出明显的灵活性改善,从调查前的3.1±9.5 cm增加到调查后的4.6±9.6 cm,平均增加1.5 cm。结论基于运动功能测量的行为改变方法显著提高了员工的灵活性,并呈现出提高SPQ得分的趋势。此外,开始锻炼的行为改变组显示出灵活性的显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信