Clinical Outcomes Following Atherectomy of Calcified Left Main Coronary

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mohamed Farag, Fatih Gungoren, Ayman Al-Atta, Ibrahem Abdalazeem, Bilal Bawamia, Mohammad Alkhalil, Mohaned Egred
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes Following Atherectomy of Calcified Left Main Coronary","authors":"Mohamed Farag,&nbsp;Fatih Gungoren,&nbsp;Ayman Al-Atta,&nbsp;Ibrahem Abdalazeem,&nbsp;Bilal Bawamia,&nbsp;Mohammad Alkhalil,&nbsp;Mohaned Egred","doi":"10.1155/joic/9605550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Plaque modifying-debulking devices are the most effective initial strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified lesions including left main coronary artery. There are limited data comparing the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of these devices in left main lesions.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of patients with calcified left main lesions treated with percutaneous intervention with adjunctive plaque modifying device at a large tertiary center between 2008 and 2021. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality at documented longest follow-up. Secondary endpoints included procedural complications and in-hospital clinical outcome.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 302 patients with calcified left main lesions treated with rotational atherectomy (RA) (<i>n</i> = 240), intracoronary lithotripsy (<i>n</i> = 30), or excimer laser coronary atherectomy (<i>n</i> = 32) were included. Out of all patients, 55% presented with acute coronary syndromes. Technical success was achieved in 98.7% of the patients and procedural success was achieved in 95.4% of the patients. At a median follow-up of 42 (19–62) months, there was no difference in mortality between the 3 devices (RA 54/240 [23.4%] vs. lithotripsy 1/30 [3.3%] vs. laser 5/32 [15.6%], <i>p</i> = 0.128). Likewise, in-hospital clinical outcomes were similar. However, procedural complications were higher in the laser group.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> In patients with calcified left main lesions treated with percutaneous intervention, adjunctive plaque-modifying devices appear safe with survival exceeding 80% at long-term follow-up with no difference between the devices in relation to in-hospital clinical outcomes or long-term mortality risk.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/joic/9605550","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/joic/9605550","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Plaque modifying-debulking devices are the most effective initial strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified lesions including left main coronary artery. There are limited data comparing the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of these devices in left main lesions.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with calcified left main lesions treated with percutaneous intervention with adjunctive plaque modifying device at a large tertiary center between 2008 and 2021. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality at documented longest follow-up. Secondary endpoints included procedural complications and in-hospital clinical outcome.

Results: A total of 302 patients with calcified left main lesions treated with rotational atherectomy (RA) (n = 240), intracoronary lithotripsy (n = 30), or excimer laser coronary atherectomy (n = 32) were included. Out of all patients, 55% presented with acute coronary syndromes. Technical success was achieved in 98.7% of the patients and procedural success was achieved in 95.4% of the patients. At a median follow-up of 42 (19–62) months, there was no difference in mortality between the 3 devices (RA 54/240 [23.4%] vs. lithotripsy 1/30 [3.3%] vs. laser 5/32 [15.6%], p = 0.128). Likewise, in-hospital clinical outcomes were similar. However, procedural complications were higher in the laser group.

Conclusions: In patients with calcified left main lesions treated with percutaneous intervention, adjunctive plaque-modifying devices appear safe with survival exceeding 80% at long-term follow-up with no difference between the devices in relation to in-hospital clinical outcomes or long-term mortality risk.

Abstract Image

钙化左主干冠状动脉粥样硬化切除术后的临床结果
导论:斑块修饰减积装置是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗包括左主干在内的严重钙化病变最有效的初始策略。比较这些装置在左主干病变中的短期和长期临床结果的数据有限。方法:回顾性分析2008年至2021年在大型三级中心经皮介入辅助斑块修饰装置治疗的左主干钙化病变患者。主要终点是记录的最长随访的长期死亡率。次要终点包括手术并发症和院内临床结果。结果:共纳入302例左主干钙化病变患者,分别采用旋转动脉粥样硬化切除术(RA) (n = 240)、冠状动脉内碎石术(n = 30)或准分子激光冠状动脉粥样硬化切除术(n = 32)。在所有患者中,55%表现为急性冠状动脉综合征。技术成功率为98.7%,手术成功率为95.4%。中位随访42(19-62)个月,3种器械的死亡率无差异(RA 54/240 [23.4%] vs碎石1/30 [3.3%]vs激光5/32 [15.6%],p = 0.128)。同样,医院内的临床结果也相似。然而,手术并发症在激光组较高。结论:在接受经皮介入治疗的左主干钙化病变患者中,辅助斑块修饰装置似乎是安全的,在长期随访中生存率超过80%,两种装置在住院临床结果或长期死亡风险方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信