Kishore Pradeep, Swapnil Mahadev Dhobale, Bidyut Pal
{"title":"Bone Remodelling in Lumbar Spine: A Comparative Analysis of Ti-Alloy, PEEK and CFR-PEEK Implant Materials","authors":"Kishore Pradeep, Swapnil Mahadev Dhobale, Bidyut Pal","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Long-term performance-based study to comprehend the biomechanics of Ti-6Al-4V, PEEK and CFR-PEEK implant materials in fusing a lumbar spine is not available in literature. The present study investigates the performance of these implant materials in fusing an L4–L5 segment by executing a strain energy density-based bone remodelling theory. The FE models of intact and implanted lumbar spines were reconstructed from computed tomography scan images and simulated for 500 N compressive load and a combination of 150 N preload and 10 Nm moment. The models attained equilibrium state when the apparent bone density change became less than 0.005 g cm<sup>−3</sup> between two consecutive iterations. The implanted models' range of motion (ROM) has been reduced by 73%–85% for Ti-6Al-4V, 64%–78% for PEEK and 69%–81% for CFR-PEEK implanted models. All models exhibit a substantial rise in bone density (30%) in the implant-bone interface region and cancellous bone. However, the CFR-PEEK implanted model exhibited a bone density loss of only 0%–0.3%, compared to the Ti-6Al-4V implanted model (0.3%–6.7%) and the PEEK model (1.5%–30%). The findings indicate that CFR-PEEK material may be a better implant material than PEEK and Ti-6Al-4V while considering bone density distributions and equivalent strains from immediate post-operative to equilibrium conditions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Long-term performance-based study to comprehend the biomechanics of Ti-6Al-4V, PEEK and CFR-PEEK implant materials in fusing a lumbar spine is not available in literature. The present study investigates the performance of these implant materials in fusing an L4–L5 segment by executing a strain energy density-based bone remodelling theory. The FE models of intact and implanted lumbar spines were reconstructed from computed tomography scan images and simulated for 500 N compressive load and a combination of 150 N preload and 10 Nm moment. The models attained equilibrium state when the apparent bone density change became less than 0.005 g cm−3 between two consecutive iterations. The implanted models' range of motion (ROM) has been reduced by 73%–85% for Ti-6Al-4V, 64%–78% for PEEK and 69%–81% for CFR-PEEK implanted models. All models exhibit a substantial rise in bone density (30%) in the implant-bone interface region and cancellous bone. However, the CFR-PEEK implanted model exhibited a bone density loss of only 0%–0.3%, compared to the Ti-6Al-4V implanted model (0.3%–6.7%) and the PEEK model (1.5%–30%). The findings indicate that CFR-PEEK material may be a better implant material than PEEK and Ti-6Al-4V while considering bone density distributions and equivalent strains from immediate post-operative to equilibrium conditions.
期刊介绍:
All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.