The Relationship Between Envy and Problematic Social Media Use: Evidence From Longitudinal Study and Daily Diary Investigation

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Na Xiao, Huiling Zhou, Shuxuan Wang, Siting Wu, Yunhan Lin, Huaibin Jiang, Xinyi Wei, Jiamei Lu
{"title":"The Relationship Between Envy and Problematic Social Media Use: Evidence From Longitudinal Study and Daily Diary Investigation","authors":"Na Xiao,&nbsp;Huiling Zhou,&nbsp;Shuxuan Wang,&nbsp;Siting Wu,&nbsp;Yunhan Lin,&nbsp;Huaibin Jiang,&nbsp;Xinyi Wei,&nbsp;Jiamei Lu","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Social media is widely used worldwide, and previous research has established a link between envy and social media use. However, the dynamic association between envy and problematic social media use has rarely been explored. Based on Social Comparison Theory and Innovation Adoption Framework, the study examined the relationship between envy and problematic social media use. Study 1 adopted a longitudinal design at the trait level and Study 2 utilised a 14-day daily diary at the state level to examine the associations between these variables. In Study 1, problematic social media use at T1 could predict envy at T2, while envy at T1 did not predict problematic social media use at T2. In Study 2, problematic social media use in the previous day could predict envy in the following day; the reverse is not the case. These findings enhance our comprehension of the underlying connections between envy and problematic social media use.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media is widely used worldwide, and previous research has established a link between envy and social media use. However, the dynamic association between envy and problematic social media use has rarely been explored. Based on Social Comparison Theory and Innovation Adoption Framework, the study examined the relationship between envy and problematic social media use. Study 1 adopted a longitudinal design at the trait level and Study 2 utilised a 14-day daily diary at the state level to examine the associations between these variables. In Study 1, problematic social media use at T1 could predict envy at T2, while envy at T1 did not predict problematic social media use at T2. In Study 2, problematic social media use in the previous day could predict envy in the following day; the reverse is not the case. These findings enhance our comprehension of the underlying connections between envy and problematic social media use.

嫉妒与不良社交媒体使用的关系:来自纵向研究和日常日记调查的证据
社交媒体在世界范围内被广泛使用,之前的研究已经建立了嫉妒和社交媒体使用之间的联系。然而,嫉妒和有问题的社交媒体使用之间的动态联系很少被探索。该研究基于社会比较理论和创新采用框架,研究了嫉妒与社交媒体使用问题之间的关系。研究1在特征水平上采用纵向设计,研究2在状态水平上使用14天的每日日记来检查这些变量之间的关联。在研究1中,T1阶段的社交媒体使用问题可以预测T2阶段的嫉妒,而T1阶段的嫉妒并不能预测T2阶段的社交媒体使用问题。在研究2中,前一天有问题的社交媒体使用可以预测第二天的嫉妒情绪;反之则不然。这些发现增强了我们对嫉妒和有问题的社交媒体使用之间潜在联系的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信