Performance Evaluation of the Dual-Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS-3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy

IF 1.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Xingli Sun, Jinjie Yao
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of the Dual-Frequency Ionospheric Free Combination on BDS-3 Single Point Positioning Accuracy","authors":"Xingli Sun,&nbsp;Jinjie Yao","doi":"10.1002/eng2.70212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article analyzes the BDS Phase III (BDS-3) single point positioning (SPP) kinematic mode performance, under seven different dual-frequency ionospheric free combinations (IFC), namely B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I, using the observation data of 84 static multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) stations for 7 days. And the three coordinates are estimated each epoch as white noise. We have derived a detailed SPP model based on timing group delay (TGD) and inter-signal correction (ISC) for IFC. Next, the BDS-3's five signals are assessed in regard to carrier-to-noise density ratio (C/N0) and code multipath (MP), B2b exhibits the best data quality, with an average C/N0 of 44.51 dB-Hz and the code MP value of 22.40 cm. The difference of C/N0 among BDS-3 single frequency signal is not obvious. The average number of satellites for all seven different IFCs is between 8.45 and 8.56, and the average PDOP value is between 2.03 and 2.08. There is not much difference in the number of satellites and PDOP between different IFCs. The root mean square error (RMSE) was used to assess the SPP performance. The sorted order of SPP kinematic performance of dual-frequency IFC, from best to worst, is B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I. The results show that the SPP kinematic accuracy of the B1C/B2a dual-frequency IFC in the three directions of north, east, and up (NEU) is 0.70, 0.69, and 1.68 m, respectively, and B2b/B3I IFC is 3.63, 3.72, and 8.49 m, respectively. B1C/B2a has a positioning accuracy ~5 times better than B2b/B3I. If there are multiple IFC, it is recommended to use B1C/B2a in SPP.</p>","PeriodicalId":72922,"journal":{"name":"Engineering reports : open access","volume":"7 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eng2.70212","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering reports : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the BDS Phase III (BDS-3) single point positioning (SPP) kinematic mode performance, under seven different dual-frequency ionospheric free combinations (IFC), namely B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I, using the observation data of 84 static multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) stations for 7 days. And the three coordinates are estimated each epoch as white noise. We have derived a detailed SPP model based on timing group delay (TGD) and inter-signal correction (ISC) for IFC. Next, the BDS-3's five signals are assessed in regard to carrier-to-noise density ratio (C/N0) and code multipath (MP), B2b exhibits the best data quality, with an average C/N0 of 44.51 dB-Hz and the code MP value of 22.40 cm. The difference of C/N0 among BDS-3 single frequency signal is not obvious. The average number of satellites for all seven different IFCs is between 8.45 and 8.56, and the average PDOP value is between 2.03 and 2.08. There is not much difference in the number of satellites and PDOP between different IFCs. The root mean square error (RMSE) was used to assess the SPP performance. The sorted order of SPP kinematic performance of dual-frequency IFC, from best to worst, is B1C/B2a, B1C/B3I, B1I/B2a, B1I/B2b, B1I/B3I, B2a/B3I, and B2b/B3I. The results show that the SPP kinematic accuracy of the B1C/B2a dual-frequency IFC in the three directions of north, east, and up (NEU) is 0.70, 0.69, and 1.68 m, respectively, and B2b/B3I IFC is 3.63, 3.72, and 8.49 m, respectively. B1C/B2a has a positioning accuracy ~5 times better than B2b/B3I. If there are multiple IFC, it is recommended to use B1C/B2a in SPP.

Abstract Image

双频电离层自由组合对BDS-3单点定位精度的性能评价
利用84个静态多gnss实验站(MGEX) 7 d的观测数据,分析了B1C/B2a、B1C/B3I、B1I/B2a、B1I/B2b、B1I/B3I、B2a/B3I和B2b/B3I 7种不同双频电离层自由组合(IFC)下BDS-3期单点定位(SPP)的运动模式性能。每个历元的三个坐标被估计为白噪声。我们基于时序群延迟(TGD)和信号间校正(ISC)为IFC导出了详细的SPP模型。其次,对北斗-3系统的5个信号进行了载波噪声密度比(C/N0)和码多径(MP)评价,其中B2b信号表现出最好的数据质量,平均C/N0为44.51 dB-Hz,码多径值为22.40 cm。北斗三号单频信号的C/N0差异不明显。所有7个不同IFCs的平均卫星数在8.45至8.56之间,平均PDOP值在2.03至2.08之间。不同IFCs之间的卫星数量和PDOP差异不大。采用均方根误差(RMSE)评价SPP的性能。双频IFC的SPP运动性能从好到坏依次为B1C/B2a、B1C/B3I、B1I/B2a、B1I/B2b、B1I/B3I、B2a/B3I、B2b/B3I。结果表明,B1C/B2a双频IFC在北、东、上三个方向(NEU)的SPP运动精度分别为0.70、0.69和1.68 m, B2b/B3I IFC的SPP运动精度分别为3.63、3.72和8.49 m。B1C/B2a的定位精度是B2b/B3I的5倍。如果有多个IFC, SPP推荐使用B1C/B2a。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信