Forward false memories of actions only occur for single and simple actions

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Teresa Limata , Monica Bucciarelli , Mara Stockner , Danilo Mitaritonna , Giuliana Mazzoni , Francesco Ianì
{"title":"Forward false memories of actions only occur for single and simple actions","authors":"Teresa Limata ,&nbsp;Monica Bucciarelli ,&nbsp;Mara Stockner ,&nbsp;Danilo Mitaritonna ,&nbsp;Giuliana Mazzoni ,&nbsp;Francesco Ianì","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Observing a photo depicting an individual about to perform an action can implicitly trigger an automatic forward mental simulation of the action's unfolding. Since automatic processes can lead to errors in source monitoring (i.e. confusing self-generated information with perception), we investigated the tendency to form false memories of forward compared to backward phases of actions. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with a series of static photos depicting unfolding actions on objects (e.g. blowing the nose), and in Experiment 2 they were presented with more complex actions in a naturalistic context (i.e. actions composed of three different sub-actions such as making coffee). In both experiments, fifteen minutes after encoding, participants completed a recognition task in which they were shown photos representing moments that were temporally distant (backward or forward in time) from the original photos, along with the same photos seen at encoding. Results revealed that participants were more likely to accept forward photos as seen compared to backward photos for simple actions, whereas this effect was absent for complex actions. In Experiment 3, we directly manipulated the complexity of actions in a single experiment and replicated the previous results. Our findings suggest that false memories due to implicit forward simulations only occur for simple actions when the action direction is mandatory. In contrast, complex actions might engage different mechanisms, such as higher-level event processing, which is easier to monitor and might reduce memory distortions. These insights expand our understanding of memory distortions for actions and highlight the role of action complexity in shaping the mechanisms of mental simulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 106252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725001921","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observing a photo depicting an individual about to perform an action can implicitly trigger an automatic forward mental simulation of the action's unfolding. Since automatic processes can lead to errors in source monitoring (i.e. confusing self-generated information with perception), we investigated the tendency to form false memories of forward compared to backward phases of actions. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with a series of static photos depicting unfolding actions on objects (e.g. blowing the nose), and in Experiment 2 they were presented with more complex actions in a naturalistic context (i.e. actions composed of three different sub-actions such as making coffee). In both experiments, fifteen minutes after encoding, participants completed a recognition task in which they were shown photos representing moments that were temporally distant (backward or forward in time) from the original photos, along with the same photos seen at encoding. Results revealed that participants were more likely to accept forward photos as seen compared to backward photos for simple actions, whereas this effect was absent for complex actions. In Experiment 3, we directly manipulated the complexity of actions in a single experiment and replicated the previous results. Our findings suggest that false memories due to implicit forward simulations only occur for simple actions when the action direction is mandatory. In contrast, complex actions might engage different mechanisms, such as higher-level event processing, which is easier to monitor and might reduce memory distortions. These insights expand our understanding of memory distortions for actions and highlight the role of action complexity in shaping the mechanisms of mental simulation.
动作的前向错误记忆只发生在单一和简单的动作上
观察一张描绘一个人即将执行某项动作的照片,可以隐含地触发对该动作展开的自动前向心理模拟。由于自动过程可能导致源监控中的错误(即将自我生成的信息与感知混淆),因此我们研究了与动作的后向阶段相比,前向阶段形成错误记忆的倾向。在实验1中,研究人员向参与者展示了一系列静态照片,这些照片描绘了在物体上展开的动作(如擤鼻涕),而在实验2中,他们展示了在自然环境中更复杂的动作(即由三个不同的子动作组成的动作,如煮咖啡)。在这两个实验中,编码后15分钟,参与者完成了一个识别任务,在这个任务中,他们看到的照片代表了与原始照片在时间上遥远(时间上向后或向前)的时刻,以及编码时看到的相同的照片。结果显示,在简单的动作中,参与者更容易接受向前看的照片,而在复杂的动作中,这种效应则不存在。在实验3中,我们直接在单个实验中操纵动作的复杂性,复制了之前的结果。我们的研究结果表明,由于内隐前向模拟导致的错误记忆只发生在动作方向是强制性的简单动作中。相反,复杂的动作可能涉及不同的机制,比如更高级的事件处理,这更容易监控,并可能减少记忆扭曲。这些见解扩展了我们对行动记忆扭曲的理解,并强调了行动复杂性在塑造心理模拟机制中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信