What are desirable biosecurity trainings for veterinary practitioners and farmers?

Q1 Social Sciences
Anna Maria Iatrou , Blerta Mehmedi Kastrati , Rreze M. Gecaj , Georgios Batikas , Jarkko K. Niemi , Claude Saegerman , Alberto Oscar Allepuz , Wiebke Jansen , Nancy De Briyne , Daniele De Meneghi , Murat Yılmaz , Evelien Biebaut , Ramazan Yildiz , Marco De Nardi , Carla Correia-Gomes , Tarmo Niine
{"title":"What are desirable biosecurity trainings for veterinary practitioners and farmers?","authors":"Anna Maria Iatrou ,&nbsp;Blerta Mehmedi Kastrati ,&nbsp;Rreze M. Gecaj ,&nbsp;Georgios Batikas ,&nbsp;Jarkko K. Niemi ,&nbsp;Claude Saegerman ,&nbsp;Alberto Oscar Allepuz ,&nbsp;Wiebke Jansen ,&nbsp;Nancy De Briyne ,&nbsp;Daniele De Meneghi ,&nbsp;Murat Yılmaz ,&nbsp;Evelien Biebaut ,&nbsp;Ramazan Yildiz ,&nbsp;Marco De Nardi ,&nbsp;Carla Correia-Gomes ,&nbsp;Tarmo Niine","doi":"10.1016/j.jobb.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective biosecurity training is essential for disease prevention in livestock systems; however, substantial gaps persist. We combined an online survey (74 fully completed questionnaires; 267 views) with two World Café workshops (∼60 participants) to map the current provision, competence levels, and training needs across Europe. Key findings: (i) self-rated biosecurity knowledge differed markedly between stakeholder groups and veterinarians and other stakeholders reported median scores close to 80/100; (ii) more than three-quarters of cattle (77 %) and 70 % of swine veterinarians perceived a major gap in their ability to demonstrate the economic benefits of biosecurity to clients; (iii) 39 – 44 % of cattle and small-ruminant veterinarians reported inadequate mixed (theory + practice) training formats, and up to 50 % of poultry veterinarians identified deficits in communication and behavior-change skills; (iv) across all discussions, participants favored modular, blended delivery that couples concise e-learning with on-farm coaching, supported by externally audited certification and greater farmer co-design. Therefore, recommendations focus on developing species-specific, flexible modules that embed communication and cost-benefit elements, provide micro-learning units for time-constrained farmers, and operate within a tiered certification framework linked to continuing professional development. Implementing these measures will narrow competence gaps, strengthen veterinarian–farmer engagement, and enhance disease preparedness throughout European livestock production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 91-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933825000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective biosecurity training is essential for disease prevention in livestock systems; however, substantial gaps persist. We combined an online survey (74 fully completed questionnaires; 267 views) with two World Café workshops (∼60 participants) to map the current provision, competence levels, and training needs across Europe. Key findings: (i) self-rated biosecurity knowledge differed markedly between stakeholder groups and veterinarians and other stakeholders reported median scores close to 80/100; (ii) more than three-quarters of cattle (77 %) and 70 % of swine veterinarians perceived a major gap in their ability to demonstrate the economic benefits of biosecurity to clients; (iii) 39 – 44 % of cattle and small-ruminant veterinarians reported inadequate mixed (theory + practice) training formats, and up to 50 % of poultry veterinarians identified deficits in communication and behavior-change skills; (iv) across all discussions, participants favored modular, blended delivery that couples concise e-learning with on-farm coaching, supported by externally audited certification and greater farmer co-design. Therefore, recommendations focus on developing species-specific, flexible modules that embed communication and cost-benefit elements, provide micro-learning units for time-constrained farmers, and operate within a tiered certification framework linked to continuing professional development. Implementing these measures will narrow competence gaps, strengthen veterinarian–farmer engagement, and enhance disease preparedness throughout European livestock production.

Abstract Image

兽医从业人员和农民需要接受哪些生物安全培训?
有效的生物安全培训对牲畜系统的疾病预防至关重要;然而,巨大的差距仍然存在。我们结合了在线调查(74份完整填写的问卷;267个视图)与两个世界咖啡研讨会(约60名参与者)一起绘制欧洲目前的供应、能力水平和培训需求。主要发现:(i)利益相关者群体之间自评生物安全知识差异显著,兽医和其他利益相关者报告的中位数得分接近80/100;(ii)超过四分之三的牛兽医(77%)和70%的猪兽医认为,他们在向客户证明生物安全的经济效益方面存在重大差距;(iii) 39% - 44%的牛和小反刍动物兽医报告说,混合(理论+实践)培训形式不足,高达50%的家禽兽医发现在沟通和行为改变技能方面存在缺陷;(iv)在所有的讨论中,参与者都倾向于模块化、混合式交付,将简洁的电子学习与农场指导结合起来,并辅以外部审计认证和更多的农民共同设计。因此,建议的重点是开发特定品种的灵活模块,这些模块包含沟通和成本效益要素,为时间有限的农民提供微型学习单元,并在与持续专业发展相关的分层认证框架内运行。实施这些措施将缩小能力差距,加强兽医农民的参与,并在整个欧洲畜牧生产中加强疾病防范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
41 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信