Streamlining one-dose package-handling process improves operational efficiency when dispensing drugs: A retrospective study

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Takahiro Kato , Miki Kato , Kazuyo Nagashiba , Masayuki Takeuchi , Masafumi Onishi
{"title":"Streamlining one-dose package-handling process improves operational efficiency when dispensing drugs: A retrospective study","authors":"Takahiro Kato ,&nbsp;Miki Kato ,&nbsp;Kazuyo Nagashiba ,&nbsp;Masayuki Takeuchi ,&nbsp;Masafumi Onishi","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Japanese pharmacists aim to improve efficiency and communication by simplifying work processes and developing protocols. While assistants and robots have been shown to improve drug dispensing, reports on the efficiency of pharmacies with automated dispensing systems are limited. This study explores factors affecting pharmacist efficiency in dispensing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>77Daily reports from our hospital pharmacy (December 1, 2020–November 30, 2021) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the mean duration of drug dispensing. Multiple regression analyses identified factors affecting dispensing time. Strategies to address these factors were implemented, and outcomes were evaluated using data from December 1, 2021–November 30, 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Univariate analysis identified that the prescription/pharmacist ratio, number of one-dose package (ODP) prescriptions, and powdered drugs significantly influenced dispensing time. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the prescription/pharmacist ratio (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), ODP prescriptions (p &lt; 0.001), and powdered drugs (<em>p</em> = 0.02) were key factors. A higher number of ODP prescriptions generally increased dispensing time. After implementing a new strategy for checking ODP, mean dispensing time decreased from 20.0 ± 4.0 to 18.5 ± 3.6 min (p &lt; 0.001), and the percentage of tasks completed in under 20 min increased from 56.3 % to 73.6 % (p &lt; 0.001). Dispensing times were reduced without changing staffing levels by reallocating tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Optimizing the ODP verification workflow enhances dispensing efficiency without increasing pharmacist workload, highlighting the importance of prioritizing ODP prescriptions and implementing support tools for final checks, while further multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings across diverse settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Japanese pharmacists aim to improve efficiency and communication by simplifying work processes and developing protocols. While assistants and robots have been shown to improve drug dispensing, reports on the efficiency of pharmacies with automated dispensing systems are limited. This study explores factors affecting pharmacist efficiency in dispensing.

Methods

77Daily reports from our hospital pharmacy (December 1, 2020–November 30, 2021) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the mean duration of drug dispensing. Multiple regression analyses identified factors affecting dispensing time. Strategies to address these factors were implemented, and outcomes were evaluated using data from December 1, 2021–November 30, 2022.

Results

Univariate analysis identified that the prescription/pharmacist ratio, number of one-dose package (ODP) prescriptions, and powdered drugs significantly influenced dispensing time. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the prescription/pharmacist ratio (p < 0.001), ODP prescriptions (p < 0.001), and powdered drugs (p = 0.02) were key factors. A higher number of ODP prescriptions generally increased dispensing time. After implementing a new strategy for checking ODP, mean dispensing time decreased from 20.0 ± 4.0 to 18.5 ± 3.6 min (p < 0.001), and the percentage of tasks completed in under 20 min increased from 56.3 % to 73.6 % (p < 0.001). Dispensing times were reduced without changing staffing levels by reallocating tasks.

Conclusions

Optimizing the ODP verification workflow enhances dispensing efficiency without increasing pharmacist workload, highlighting the importance of prioritizing ODP prescriptions and implementing support tools for final checks, while further multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings across diverse settings.
简化单剂量包装处理过程可提高配药时的操作效率:一项回顾性研究
日本药剂师旨在通过简化工作流程和制定协议来提高效率和沟通。虽然助手和机器人已被证明可以改善药物分配,但关于使用自动分配系统的药房效率的报告有限。本研究探讨药师调剂效率的影响因素。方法回顾性分析我院2020年12月1日- 2021年11月30日的每日药学报告77份。主要观察指标为平均配药时间。多元回归分析确定了影响配药时间的因素。实施了解决这些因素的策略,并使用2021年12月1日至2022年11月30日的数据对结果进行了评估。结果单因素分析发现,处方/药师比例、单剂量包装(ODP)处方数量和粉末状药物对调剂时间有显著影响。多因素分析证实,处方/药师比(p <;0.001), ODP处方(p <;0.001),粉状药物(p = 0.02)是关键因素。较高的ODP处方数量通常会增加配药时间。在实施新的ODP检查策略后,平均点胶时间从20.0±4.0分钟减少到18.5±3.6分钟(p <;0.001),在20分钟内完成任务的百分比从56.3%增加到73.6% (p <;0.001)。通过重新分配任务,在不改变人员配置水平的情况下减少了分配时间。结论:优化ODP验证工作流程可以在不增加药师工作量的情况下提高调剂效率,强调了ODP处方优先排序和实施最终检查支持工具的重要性,而进一步的多中心研究需要在不同环境下证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信