29. THE MAKING ENGAGEMENT MEANINGFUL THROUGH ORGANIZED ROUTINE INTERACTION (MEMORI) CORPS PROGRAM: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTICIPANT SATISFACTION

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Macy Young , Cynthia Fields , Quincy Samus , Katherine Marx
{"title":"29. THE MAKING ENGAGEMENT MEANINGFUL THROUGH ORGANIZED ROUTINE INTERACTION (MEMORI) CORPS PROGRAM: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTICIPANT SATISFACTION","authors":"Macy Young ,&nbsp;Cynthia Fields ,&nbsp;Quincy Samus ,&nbsp;Katherine Marx","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.04.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Virtual companionship services that utilize volunteers to engage with community-living persons with dementia (PWD) may be a cost-effective and sustainable way to improve behavioral outcomes, quality of life, and reduce caregiver (CG) strain. However, there is limited evidence about acceptability, feasibility, and perceived benefits of such programs. This study evaluates satisfaction with MEMORI Corps, a 12-week virtual companionship and activity program, among PWD and CGs who participated in a pilot randomized controlled trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Online program satisfaction surveys were completed by CGs of PWD who received the intervention. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize 3 major domains: acceptability and feasibility of program components, perceived program impact on the PWD, and perceived program impact on the CG.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nearly 90% of CGs reported excellent/good feasibility and acceptability for all 22 program aspects. GREATER THAN 50% of CGs agreed with 8/11 perceived benefits the PWD received from the program. The greatest perceived benefits were that the PWD enjoyed the volunteer’s companionship and the activity sessions. ≥70% of CGs disagreed that the program made things worse, was distressing/upsetting, or was boring for the PWD. GREATER THAN 50% of CGs agreed with 13/16 perceived benefits personally received from the program. The greatest perceived benefits personally received were the happiness it brought CGs to see the PWD engaging with the volunteer and the time it allowed CGs for themselves.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CGs reported high satisfaction with MEMORI Corps overall. They also identified areas with lower satisfaction, including program orientation and knowing program expectations, which provide opportunities for enhancement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 10","pages":"Page S21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748125001411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Virtual companionship services that utilize volunteers to engage with community-living persons with dementia (PWD) may be a cost-effective and sustainable way to improve behavioral outcomes, quality of life, and reduce caregiver (CG) strain. However, there is limited evidence about acceptability, feasibility, and perceived benefits of such programs. This study evaluates satisfaction with MEMORI Corps, a 12-week virtual companionship and activity program, among PWD and CGs who participated in a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Methods

Online program satisfaction surveys were completed by CGs of PWD who received the intervention. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize 3 major domains: acceptability and feasibility of program components, perceived program impact on the PWD, and perceived program impact on the CG.

Results

Nearly 90% of CGs reported excellent/good feasibility and acceptability for all 22 program aspects. GREATER THAN 50% of CGs agreed with 8/11 perceived benefits the PWD received from the program. The greatest perceived benefits were that the PWD enjoyed the volunteer’s companionship and the activity sessions. ≥70% of CGs disagreed that the program made things worse, was distressing/upsetting, or was boring for the PWD. GREATER THAN 50% of CGs agreed with 13/16 perceived benefits personally received from the program. The greatest perceived benefits personally received were the happiness it brought CGs to see the PWD engaging with the volunteer and the time it allowed CGs for themselves.

Conclusions

CGs reported high satisfaction with MEMORI Corps overall. They also identified areas with lower satisfaction, including program orientation and knowing program expectations, which provide opportunities for enhancement.
29. 通过有组织的日常互动(记忆)团队项目使参与有意义:参与者满意度的描述性分析
利用志愿者与社区生活的痴呆症患者(PWD)接触的虚拟陪伴服务可能是一种具有成本效益和可持续的方式,可以改善行为结果、生活质量并减少照顾者(CG)的压力。然而,关于这些项目的可接受性、可行性和可感知的好处的证据有限。本研究评估了参加一项随机对照试验的PWD和CGs对MEMORI Corps的满意度,MEMORI Corps是一个为期12周的虚拟陪伴和活动项目。方法对接受干预的PWD监护官进行在线项目满意度调查。描述性分析用于总结3个主要领域:项目组件的可接受性和可行性,项目对PWD的感知影响,以及项目对CG的感知影响。结果近90%的CGs报告了所有22个项目方面的优秀/良好的可行性和可接受性。超过50%的cg同意8/11的PWD从该计划中获得的感知效益。最大的好处是残疾人士喜欢志愿者的陪伴和活动环节。≥70%的cg不同意该计划使事情变得更糟,对PWD来说是痛苦/沮丧或无聊的。超过50%的CGs同意13/16个人从该计划中获得的好处。我个人认为最大的好处是,它给志愿者们带来了快乐,看到PWD与志愿者互动,让志愿者们有了自己的时间。结论scg对MEMORI Corps总体满意度较高。他们还确定了满意度较低的领域,包括项目导向和了解项目期望,这些都提供了改进的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信