Design and performance characteristics of an in-stream woodchip denitrifying bioreactor for the treatment of agricultural drainage 1. Design, hydraulics and nitrate removal.

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Lee Burbery , Phil Abraham , Andrew Pearson , Murray Close , Theo Sarris
{"title":"Design and performance characteristics of an in-stream woodchip denitrifying bioreactor for the treatment of agricultural drainage 1. Design, hydraulics and nitrate removal.","authors":"Lee Burbery ,&nbsp;Phil Abraham ,&nbsp;Andrew Pearson ,&nbsp;Murray Close ,&nbsp;Theo Sarris","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Woodchip denitrifying bioreactors (WDBs) are an established edge-of-field practice for mitigating nitrogen (N) loads in agricultural drainage waters. Of the published ‘in-stream’ WDB case studies, many have suffered hydraulic failure due to siltation and clogging. In this study we present a very large (450 m<sup>3</sup>) in-stream WDB of a modular design that sought to incorporate clogging management features. The WDB was designed to provide long-term treatment of dairy land drain water flowing at 6 L/s containing 6 mg nitrate-N/L on average. The hydraulic function of the in-stream WDB and nitrate removal efficacy were determined from monthly monitoring conducted over the first two years of its operation. A 69 % reduction in the equivalent hydraulic conductivity <em>K̅</em><sub><em>x</em></sub> and 25 % reduction in effective porosity were observed over this time, during which the bioreactor was estimated to have retained at least 2.6 t of sediment. A logarithmic relationship between <em>K̅</em><sub><em>x</em></sub> and sediment load best described the clogging. The average nitrate removal rate was 3.3 ± 1.0 g N/m<sup>3</sup> woodchip/day. Annualised removal rates were 497 and 485 kg N/year, which are on par with performance calculations made during the design phase. Nitrate removal was sensitive to temperature and could be modelled effectively assuming Arrhenius temperature dependence and zero-order reaction. The resulting zero-order nitrate reaction rate for a 20 °C reference temperature was 7.93 ± 4.64 mg N/L/day and the Arrhenius temperature coefficient was 1.06 ± 0.09. Parameter estimates were within the range of values typically associated with WDBs. The need for long-term monitoring of this in-stream WDB is discussed in the context of testing its modular design functionality for increased operational longevity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 107703"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001934","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Woodchip denitrifying bioreactors (WDBs) are an established edge-of-field practice for mitigating nitrogen (N) loads in agricultural drainage waters. Of the published ‘in-stream’ WDB case studies, many have suffered hydraulic failure due to siltation and clogging. In this study we present a very large (450 m3) in-stream WDB of a modular design that sought to incorporate clogging management features. The WDB was designed to provide long-term treatment of dairy land drain water flowing at 6 L/s containing 6 mg nitrate-N/L on average. The hydraulic function of the in-stream WDB and nitrate removal efficacy were determined from monthly monitoring conducted over the first two years of its operation. A 69 % reduction in the equivalent hydraulic conductivity x and 25 % reduction in effective porosity were observed over this time, during which the bioreactor was estimated to have retained at least 2.6 t of sediment. A logarithmic relationship between x and sediment load best described the clogging. The average nitrate removal rate was 3.3 ± 1.0 g N/m3 woodchip/day. Annualised removal rates were 497 and 485 kg N/year, which are on par with performance calculations made during the design phase. Nitrate removal was sensitive to temperature and could be modelled effectively assuming Arrhenius temperature dependence and zero-order reaction. The resulting zero-order nitrate reaction rate for a 20 °C reference temperature was 7.93 ± 4.64 mg N/L/day and the Arrhenius temperature coefficient was 1.06 ± 0.09. Parameter estimates were within the range of values typically associated with WDBs. The need for long-term monitoring of this in-stream WDB is discussed in the context of testing its modular design functionality for increased operational longevity.
木屑反硝化生物反应器处理农业废水的设计与性能设计,液压和硝酸盐去除。
木片反硝化生物反应器(wdb)是一种已建立的减少农业排水中氮(N)负荷的边缘实践。在已发表的“流内”WDB案例研究中,许多都因淤积和堵塞而遭受水力破坏。在这项研究中,我们提出了一个非常大的(450立方米)模块化设计的流内WDB,旨在整合堵塞管理功能。WDB设计用于长期处理流量为6 L/s、平均硝酸盐含量为6 mg /L的奶牛场排水。在运行的头两年里,通过每月监测,确定了进水WDB的水力功能和硝酸盐去除效果。在此期间,观察到等效水力电导率K′x降低了69%,有效孔隙率降低了25%,在此期间,生物反应器估计保留了至少2.6 t的沉积物。K′x与泥沙负荷之间的对数关系最好地描述了堵塞。平均硝酸盐去除率为3.3±1.0 g N/m3 /d。年化去除率分别为497和485 kg N/年,与设计阶段的性能计算相当。硝态氮的去除对温度敏感,可以采用Arrhenius温度依赖和零级反应进行有效模拟。在20℃条件下,零级硝酸盐反应速率为7.93±4.64 mg N/L/day, Arrhenius温度系数为1.06±0.09。参数估计在通常与wdb相关的值范围内。在测试其模块化设计功能以延长运行寿命的背景下,讨论了对该流内WDB进行长期监控的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信