50. WHY NOT GERIATRICS? TRAINEE INTEREST IN AND BELIEFS ABOUT WORKING WITH OLDER ADULTS

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Emily Kulpa , Sierra D. Thomas , Emma Williams , Tasha Woodall , Arushi Kapoor , Carissa Lau-Julien
{"title":"50. WHY NOT GERIATRICS? TRAINEE INTEREST IN AND BELIEFS ABOUT WORKING WITH OLDER ADULTS","authors":"Emily Kulpa ,&nbsp;Sierra D. Thomas ,&nbsp;Emma Williams ,&nbsp;Tasha Woodall ,&nbsp;Arushi Kapoor ,&nbsp;Carissa Lau-Julien","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.04.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The global population of older adults is rapidly increasing, yet there is a persistent shortage of healthcare professionals trained to address their unique and growing care needs. A contributing factor to this gap is the relative lack of popularity of geriatrics as a specialty among trainees. This study explores the attitudes of resident physicians and pharmacy students towards pursuing careers in geriatrics through two qualitative analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eight resident physicians specializing in family medicine, internal medicine, and psychiatry participated in focus groups at a single training site in North Carolina. Discussions were moderated by a research associate, without affiliation to a specific medical field, using five open-ended questions, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for recurring themes.</div><div>Additionally, two virtual focus groups were conducted with second- and third-year pharmacy students from a public school of pharmacy in North Carolina. A moderator guided discussions through 13 questions addressing career aspirations, factors influencing interest or disinterest in geriatrics, and general attitudes toward older adults. Transcripts were systematically coded and analyzed to identify common themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the resident physician focus groups, the key factors fostering interest in geriatrics included: (1) the opportunity to build deep connections with patients, (2) personal fulfillment from focusing on quality of life and dignity at end-of-life care, and (3) the diverse practice settings available.</div><div>Conversely, barriers included: (1) inadequate resources and support for the geriatric population, (2) emotional and cognitive challenges related to complex care needs, (3) perceived undervaluation of geriatrics within medicine and (4) lower financial compensation.</div><div>For the pharmacy students, factors encouraging interest comprised: (1) job security, (2) alignment with preferred clinical activities, (3) exposure to higher clinical acuity, (4) meaningful relationships with older adults, and (5) positive prior experiences with older adults.</div><div>Deterrents included: (1) heightened professional liability, (2) negative past experiences, (3) insufficient geriatric exposure, and (4) communication challenges with older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both resident physicians and pharmacy students highlighted the significance of forming meaningful relationships with patients as a primary motivator for interest in geriatrics. These findings provide a foundation for addressing barriers and enhancing factors that can attract more trainees to the field, thereby mitigating the ongoing shortage of geriatric healthcare professionals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"33 10","pages":"Page S37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748125001629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The global population of older adults is rapidly increasing, yet there is a persistent shortage of healthcare professionals trained to address their unique and growing care needs. A contributing factor to this gap is the relative lack of popularity of geriatrics as a specialty among trainees. This study explores the attitudes of resident physicians and pharmacy students towards pursuing careers in geriatrics through two qualitative analyses.

Methods

Eight resident physicians specializing in family medicine, internal medicine, and psychiatry participated in focus groups at a single training site in North Carolina. Discussions were moderated by a research associate, without affiliation to a specific medical field, using five open-ended questions, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for recurring themes.
Additionally, two virtual focus groups were conducted with second- and third-year pharmacy students from a public school of pharmacy in North Carolina. A moderator guided discussions through 13 questions addressing career aspirations, factors influencing interest or disinterest in geriatrics, and general attitudes toward older adults. Transcripts were systematically coded and analyzed to identify common themes.

Results

Among the resident physician focus groups, the key factors fostering interest in geriatrics included: (1) the opportunity to build deep connections with patients, (2) personal fulfillment from focusing on quality of life and dignity at end-of-life care, and (3) the diverse practice settings available.
Conversely, barriers included: (1) inadequate resources and support for the geriatric population, (2) emotional and cognitive challenges related to complex care needs, (3) perceived undervaluation of geriatrics within medicine and (4) lower financial compensation.
For the pharmacy students, factors encouraging interest comprised: (1) job security, (2) alignment with preferred clinical activities, (3) exposure to higher clinical acuity, (4) meaningful relationships with older adults, and (5) positive prior experiences with older adults.
Deterrents included: (1) heightened professional liability, (2) negative past experiences, (3) insufficient geriatric exposure, and (4) communication challenges with older adults.

Conclusions

Both resident physicians and pharmacy students highlighted the significance of forming meaningful relationships with patients as a primary motivator for interest in geriatrics. These findings provide a foundation for addressing barriers and enhancing factors that can attract more trainees to the field, thereby mitigating the ongoing shortage of geriatric healthcare professionals.
50. 为什么不是老年医学?学员对与老年人一起工作的兴趣和信念
全球老年人人口正在迅速增加,然而,经过培训以满足他们独特和不断增长的护理需求的医疗保健专业人员持续短缺。造成这种差距的一个因素是,老年病学作为一门专业在受训者中相对缺乏知名度。本研究透过两个质性分析,探讨住院医师与药学学生对从事老年医学职业的态度。方法8名家庭医学、内科和精神病学住院医师在北卡罗来纳州的一个培训地点参加了焦点小组。讨论由一名研究助理主持,不隶属于特定的医学领域,使用五个开放式问题,记录,转录和分析反复出现的主题。此外,两个虚拟焦点小组由北卡罗来纳州一所公立药学院的二年级和三年级的药学学生组成。主持人通过13个问题引导讨论,涉及职业抱负、影响对老年医学感兴趣或不感兴趣的因素,以及对老年人的普遍态度。记录被系统地编码和分析,以确定共同的主题。结果在住院医师焦点小组中,培养对老年病学兴趣的关键因素包括:(1)与患者建立深度联系的机会;(2)关注临终关怀的生活质量和尊严带来的个人成就感;(3)可获得的多样化实践环境。相反,障碍包括:(1)对老年人口的资源和支持不足;(2)与复杂护理需求相关的情感和认知挑战;(3)医学界对老年病学的认知低估;(4)较低的经济补偿。对于药学学生,鼓励兴趣的因素包括:(1)工作保障,(2)与首选临床活动的一致性,(3)接触更高的临床灵敏度,(4)与老年人有意义的关系,以及(5)与老年人的积极经验。阻碍因素包括:(1)职业责任加重,(2)负面过去经历,(3)老年接触不足,以及(4)与老年人沟通困难。结论住院医师和药学学生都强调了与患者建立有意义的关系的重要性,这是对老年医学感兴趣的主要动机。这些发现为解决障碍和增强因素提供了基础,这些因素可以吸引更多的学员到该领域,从而缓解老年保健专业人员的持续短缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信