A climate risk hedge? Investigating the exposure of green and non-green corporate bonds to climate risk

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Nicola Bartolini, Silvia Romagnoli, Amia Santini
{"title":"A climate risk hedge? Investigating the exposure of green and non-green corporate bonds to climate risk","authors":"Nicola Bartolini,&nbsp;Silvia Romagnoli,&nbsp;Amia Santini","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We perform an in-depth analysis of climate risk in the corporate bond market, focusing on the green-bond issuers of the three largest European Union economies by GDP: Germany, France, and Italy. We do so by evaluating the impact, on the spreads of their green and non-green bonds, of a number of potential physical risk drivers, selected in line with the ECB climate stress tests and the extant literature, and through the fitting of ARIMAX models. Additionally, we include the log-returns of EU carbon allowances as a potential proxy of transition risk. We find that green and non-green bonds of the same issuer can differ in their exposure to the physical risk variables. Depending on the issuer, green bonds can be equally or less exposed than their non-green counterparts. Additionally, multiple firms in the renewable energy sector have green bonds which provide protection against physical risk. EU carbon allowances are not found to have a consistently significant impact on bond spreads. In line with these findings, we propose an extension of an intensity-based (reduced-form) credit risk model and assess its ability to describe and fit the bond data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 108664"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We perform an in-depth analysis of climate risk in the corporate bond market, focusing on the green-bond issuers of the three largest European Union economies by GDP: Germany, France, and Italy. We do so by evaluating the impact, on the spreads of their green and non-green bonds, of a number of potential physical risk drivers, selected in line with the ECB climate stress tests and the extant literature, and through the fitting of ARIMAX models. Additionally, we include the log-returns of EU carbon allowances as a potential proxy of transition risk. We find that green and non-green bonds of the same issuer can differ in their exposure to the physical risk variables. Depending on the issuer, green bonds can be equally or less exposed than their non-green counterparts. Additionally, multiple firms in the renewable energy sector have green bonds which provide protection against physical risk. EU carbon allowances are not found to have a consistently significant impact on bond spreads. In line with these findings, we propose an extension of an intensity-based (reduced-form) credit risk model and assess its ability to describe and fit the bond data.
气候风险对冲?调查绿色和非绿色公司债券对气候风险的敞口
我们对公司债券市场的气候风险进行了深入分析,重点关注三个GDP最大的欧盟经济体(德国、法国和意大利)的绿色债券发行人。为此,我们根据欧洲央行气候压力测试和现有文献,并通过拟合ARIMAX模型,评估了一些潜在的物理风险驱动因素对其绿色和非绿色债券利差的影响。此外,我们将欧盟碳配额的对数回报作为过渡风险的潜在代理。我们发现,同一发行人的绿色债券和非绿色债券在物理风险变量上的暴露可能不同。根据发行人的不同,绿色债券的风险敞口可能与非绿色债券相同,也可能更低。此外,可再生能源领域的多家公司都有绿色债券,为抵御实物风险提供保护。欧盟碳排放配额并未对债券息差产生持续的显著影响。根据这些发现,我们提出了基于强度(简化形式)的信用风险模型的扩展,并评估了其描述和拟合债券数据的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信