Once Gestational diabetes, always Gestational diabetes? Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with gestational diabetes preceding non gestational diabetes pregnancy- A retrospective cohort study.
{"title":"Once Gestational diabetes, always Gestational diabetes? Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with gestational diabetes preceding non gestational diabetes pregnancy- A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yael Shalev-Rosenthal,Eran Hadar,Adam Rosenthal,Shai Ram,Hila Shalev-Ram,Shir Danieli-Gruber,Anat Pardo,Anat Shmueli","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere is limited information about maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant individuals without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), who were diagnosed with GDM in the preceding pregnancy.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo investigate whether individuals previously diagnosed with GDM but not in subsequent pregnancy present similar diabetes-related complications, despite the lack of diagnosis Study Design: A retrospective cohort design was employed, including individuals with at least two consecutive births at a tertiary Medical Center between July 2012 and December 2022. Participants were categorized into three groups: individuals with GDM in both pregnancies (group 1), GDM in the first pregnancy but not in the subsequent pregnancy (group 2), and no GDM in both pregnancies (group 3). Groups were compared for various diabetes-related complications.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe study population comprised 19,703 individuals . Group 2 showed higher rates of macrosomia (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.01-1.92, p=0.03) large-for-gestational-age (LGA) (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, p<0.01) and preeclampsia (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.32-4.15, p<0.01) when compared to group 3. Rates of LGA macrosomia and preeclampsia were similar between group 1 and 2. The composite maternal-neonatal adverse outcome was significantly elevated in groups 1 and 2 compared to group 3 (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.23-1.77, p<0.01 and OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.58-2.3, p<0.01; respectively). In a multivariate regression, the adjusted OR (accounting for BMI before 2nd birth, age at 2nd birth and parity) for composite maternal-neonatal outcomes was 1.75 (95% CI 1.36-2.25, p<0.01) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.01-1.67, p=0.03) in groups 1 and 2 respectively, compared to group 3. Elective cesarean delivery rate was higher in groups 1 (22%) and 2 (13%) compared to group 3 (8.7%). However, the rate was also significantly higher in group 1 versus 2. Preterm birth rates were higher in group 1 (OR 1.7, 1.2-2.3, p<0.01) but not 2, when compared to group 3.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIndividuals with a history of GDM in a previous pregnancy but not in subsequent pregnancy are at increased risk of diabetes-related complications, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and LGA. The findings suggest that these individuals may have underlying insulin resistance, as well as other, still occurring, risk factors and their absence of a GDM diagnosis does not eliminate the risk of adverse outcomes. .","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.07.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
There is limited information about maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant individuals without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), who were diagnosed with GDM in the preceding pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether individuals previously diagnosed with GDM but not in subsequent pregnancy present similar diabetes-related complications, despite the lack of diagnosis Study Design: A retrospective cohort design was employed, including individuals with at least two consecutive births at a tertiary Medical Center between July 2012 and December 2022. Participants were categorized into three groups: individuals with GDM in both pregnancies (group 1), GDM in the first pregnancy but not in the subsequent pregnancy (group 2), and no GDM in both pregnancies (group 3). Groups were compared for various diabetes-related complications.
RESULTS
The study population comprised 19,703 individuals . Group 2 showed higher rates of macrosomia (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.01-1.92, p=0.03) large-for-gestational-age (LGA) (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, p<0.01) and preeclampsia (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.32-4.15, p<0.01) when compared to group 3. Rates of LGA macrosomia and preeclampsia were similar between group 1 and 2. The composite maternal-neonatal adverse outcome was significantly elevated in groups 1 and 2 compared to group 3 (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.23-1.77, p<0.01 and OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.58-2.3, p<0.01; respectively). In a multivariate regression, the adjusted OR (accounting for BMI before 2nd birth, age at 2nd birth and parity) for composite maternal-neonatal outcomes was 1.75 (95% CI 1.36-2.25, p<0.01) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.01-1.67, p=0.03) in groups 1 and 2 respectively, compared to group 3. Elective cesarean delivery rate was higher in groups 1 (22%) and 2 (13%) compared to group 3 (8.7%). However, the rate was also significantly higher in group 1 versus 2. Preterm birth rates were higher in group 1 (OR 1.7, 1.2-2.3, p<0.01) but not 2, when compared to group 3.
CONCLUSIONS
Individuals with a history of GDM in a previous pregnancy but not in subsequent pregnancy are at increased risk of diabetes-related complications, including preeclampsia, macrosomia, and LGA. The findings suggest that these individuals may have underlying insulin resistance, as well as other, still occurring, risk factors and their absence of a GDM diagnosis does not eliminate the risk of adverse outcomes. .
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.