Prevention approaches aimed at men who commit violence against women: a scoping review.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2025-07-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2025-0036en
Victoria Leslyê Rocha Gutmann, Gisele Cristina Manfrini, Tereza Maria Mendes Diniz de Andrade Barroso, Camila Daiane Silva, Sheila Rubia Lindner, Sandra Mara Corrêa
{"title":"Prevention approaches aimed at men who commit violence against women: a scoping review.","authors":"Victoria Leslyê Rocha Gutmann, Gisele Cristina Manfrini, Tereza Maria Mendes Diniz de Andrade Barroso, Camila Daiane Silva, Sheila Rubia Lindner, Sandra Mara Corrêa","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2025-0036en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention approaches applied to men who commit violence against women.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative scoping review, according to JBI guidelines. The search was carried out from July to October 2022 in the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BDENF, IndexPsi, SciELO and Google Scholar databases, without restrictions regarding geographic area, publication date, and/or language. All studies were assessed for reliability and credibility, according to the ConQual Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were selected, most of which had a secondary and tertiary level approach. Only two studies fell within primary prevention. The interventions were mostly carried out in groups. The interdisciplinary/interprofessional dynamic, rarely described, involved areas such as psychology, social assistance, and other fields of social sciences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interventions, in general, followed the group approach, with the potential to be replicated in other services, including health services and for other audiences, as long as they have the theoretical and human support for this, expanding the actions to the primary level of prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"59 ","pages":"e20250036"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2025-0036en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To map primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention approaches applied to men who commit violence against women.

Method: Qualitative scoping review, according to JBI guidelines. The search was carried out from July to October 2022 in the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, BDENF, IndexPsi, SciELO and Google Scholar databases, without restrictions regarding geographic area, publication date, and/or language. All studies were assessed for reliability and credibility, according to the ConQual Score.

Results: Twenty-eight studies were selected, most of which had a secondary and tertiary level approach. Only two studies fell within primary prevention. The interventions were mostly carried out in groups. The interdisciplinary/interprofessional dynamic, rarely described, involved areas such as psychology, social assistance, and other fields of social sciences.

Conclusion: The interventions, in general, followed the group approach, with the potential to be replicated in other services, including health services and for other audiences, as long as they have the theoretical and human support for this, expanding the actions to the primary level of prevention.

针对男性暴力侵害妇女的预防措施:范围审查。
目的:绘制适用于对妇女实施暴力的男性的初级、二级和三级预防方法。方法:根据JBI指南进行定性范围审查。检索于2022年7月至10月在MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Scopus、Web of Science、LILACS、BDENF、IndexPsi、SciELO和谷歌Scholar数据库中进行,不受地理区域、出版日期和/或语言的限制。根据征服评分对所有研究的可靠性和可信性进行评估。结果:选取了28项研究,其中大部分采用二级和三级方法。只有两项研究属于初级预防范畴。这些干预措施大多是分组进行的。这种跨学科/跨专业的动态,很少被描述,涉及心理学、社会援助和其他社会科学领域。结论:总的来说,这些干预措施采用了小组方法,只要有理论和人力支持,就有可能在其他服务中复制,包括保健服务和其他受众,从而将行动扩大到初级预防一级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信