Assessment Scores for Patients with Central Neurological Conditions in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Silvia Campagnini, Kaan Borekci, Kyle Embry, Arun Jayaraman
{"title":"Assessment Scores for Patients with Central Neurological Conditions in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Silvia Campagnini, Kaan Borekci, Kyle Embry, Arun Jayaraman","doi":"10.1109/ICORR66766.2025.11062944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In rehabilitation, evidence-based practice relies on evaluating patients' standardized outcomes to manage care plans and resources; however, the selection of tools to use is globally inconsistent. Alternatively, emerging technologies can measure high-resolution biomarkers, but their implementation remains a challenge. Given the amount of measures, interest in new scoring systems of patient health synthesizing multisource data is rising. Emerging research in rehabilitation lacks standardized guidelines and psychometric validation of these scores. Hence, this review systematically examines the methods used for developing and validating patient assessment scores in rehabilitation. A systematic search included studies on the development and validation of scores to assess adult patients with central neurological disorders in rehabilitation. Nineteen studies were synthesized. In the score development, simpler methods and input data were more common (11 studies used statistics, 12 clinical data). In the validation, the heterogeneity in reference standards and tests in scores' psychometric analysis highlights the need for evidence and standardized processes in this field. Clinically relevant information is crucial for implementable scores able to guide clinical decision-making and care strategies. Future studies should adopt exploratory approaches, analyzing various input data, methods, and psychometric properties' impact on the score capability to assess patient health.</p>","PeriodicalId":73276,"journal":{"name":"IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]","volume":"2025 ","pages":"675-680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR66766.2025.11062944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In rehabilitation, evidence-based practice relies on evaluating patients' standardized outcomes to manage care plans and resources; however, the selection of tools to use is globally inconsistent. Alternatively, emerging technologies can measure high-resolution biomarkers, but their implementation remains a challenge. Given the amount of measures, interest in new scoring systems of patient health synthesizing multisource data is rising. Emerging research in rehabilitation lacks standardized guidelines and psychometric validation of these scores. Hence, this review systematically examines the methods used for developing and validating patient assessment scores in rehabilitation. A systematic search included studies on the development and validation of scores to assess adult patients with central neurological disorders in rehabilitation. Nineteen studies were synthesized. In the score development, simpler methods and input data were more common (11 studies used statistics, 12 clinical data). In the validation, the heterogeneity in reference standards and tests in scores' psychometric analysis highlights the need for evidence and standardized processes in this field. Clinically relevant information is crucial for implementable scores able to guide clinical decision-making and care strategies. Future studies should adopt exploratory approaches, analyzing various input data, methods, and psychometric properties' impact on the score capability to assess patient health.

康复中枢性神经系统疾病患者的评估评分:一项系统综述。
在康复方面,循证实践依赖于评估患者的标准化结果来管理护理计划和资源;然而,要使用的工具的选择在全局上是不一致的。另外,新兴技术可以测量高分辨率的生物标志物,但它们的实施仍然是一个挑战。考虑到测量的数量,对综合多源数据的患者健康新评分系统的兴趣正在上升。新兴的康复研究缺乏标准化的指导方针和对这些分数的心理测量验证。因此,本综述系统地研究了用于开发和验证康复患者评估评分的方法。一项系统的搜索研究包括了评分的发展和验证,以评估成人中枢神经系统疾病患者的康复。共合成了19项研究。在评分编制中,采用更简单的方法和输入数据较多(11项研究采用统计学,12项研究采用临床数据)。在验证中,参考标准和分数心理测量分析测试的异质性突出了该领域对证据和标准化过程的需求。临床相关信息对于能够指导临床决策和护理策略的可实施评分至关重要。未来的研究应采用探索性方法,分析各种输入数据、方法和心理测量特性对评分能力的影响,以评估患者的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信