{"title":"A Systematic Review of Communication-Focused Dementia Interventions for Indigenous Communities.","authors":"Megan Eustace, Campbell Le Heron, Jeanette King, Katrina McGarr, Catherine Theys","doi":"10.1177/14713012251358912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dementia is a significant challenge for many Indigenous peoples who face inequities in risk factors, prevalence, progression rates, and access to quality healthcare. Culturally relevant interventions are needed across the care pathway, however, little evidence exists to guide culturally relevant communication support. This systematic review aims to understand dementia communication interventions developed for Indigenous populations and explore factors relating to their effectiveness. A systematic search of databases, repositories, and search engines was conducted. We took a comprehensive approach to communication, considering the communication skills and abilities of people with dementia, their communication partners, healthcare providers, and community-level information sharing. Studies were required to evaluate an intervention targeting communicative skills, communicative ability, or health communication and include a cultural focus on one or more Indigenous communities. Quality was appraised using an adapted Well Living House Quality Appraisal Tool. Six studies met inclusion criteria, with most studies (<i>n</i> = 5) conducted from 2019 onwards. No studies evaluated an intervention targeting communicative skills and abilities for people with dementia, their communication partners, or healthcare providers. All included studies evaluated a health communication intervention. Interventions utilised various resources, including storybooks, videos, flipcharts, posters, handouts, worksheets, fact sheets, and training modules, tailored towards Indigenous communities across Canada, the United States, and Australia. Content about dementia and dementia management varied across interventions. Analysis identified key benefits of the interventions and three factors influencing their effectiveness: (1) representation of Indigenous people, cultures, and languages in resources, (2) methods and settings for knowledge sharing, and (3) communication, connection, and collaboration. While content within resources and methods for information sharing should be tailored to local communities, common elements may support health communication developments across Indigenous contexts. Further research is needed to develop interventions specifically targeting communication skills and conduct methodologically strong evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251358912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251358912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dementia is a significant challenge for many Indigenous peoples who face inequities in risk factors, prevalence, progression rates, and access to quality healthcare. Culturally relevant interventions are needed across the care pathway, however, little evidence exists to guide culturally relevant communication support. This systematic review aims to understand dementia communication interventions developed for Indigenous populations and explore factors relating to their effectiveness. A systematic search of databases, repositories, and search engines was conducted. We took a comprehensive approach to communication, considering the communication skills and abilities of people with dementia, their communication partners, healthcare providers, and community-level information sharing. Studies were required to evaluate an intervention targeting communicative skills, communicative ability, or health communication and include a cultural focus on one or more Indigenous communities. Quality was appraised using an adapted Well Living House Quality Appraisal Tool. Six studies met inclusion criteria, with most studies (n = 5) conducted from 2019 onwards. No studies evaluated an intervention targeting communicative skills and abilities for people with dementia, their communication partners, or healthcare providers. All included studies evaluated a health communication intervention. Interventions utilised various resources, including storybooks, videos, flipcharts, posters, handouts, worksheets, fact sheets, and training modules, tailored towards Indigenous communities across Canada, the United States, and Australia. Content about dementia and dementia management varied across interventions. Analysis identified key benefits of the interventions and three factors influencing their effectiveness: (1) representation of Indigenous people, cultures, and languages in resources, (2) methods and settings for knowledge sharing, and (3) communication, connection, and collaboration. While content within resources and methods for information sharing should be tailored to local communities, common elements may support health communication developments across Indigenous contexts. Further research is needed to develop interventions specifically targeting communication skills and conduct methodologically strong evaluations.
对于许多土著人民来说,痴呆症是一项重大挑战,他们在风险因素、患病率、进展率和获得优质医疗保健方面面临不平等。文化相关的干预措施需要贯穿整个护理途径,然而,很少有证据指导文化相关的沟通支持。本系统综述旨在了解为土著居民开发的痴呆症沟通干预措施,并探讨其有效性相关因素。对数据库、存储库和搜索引擎进行了系统搜索。我们采用了综合的沟通方法,考虑了痴呆症患者、他们的沟通伙伴、医疗保健提供者和社区层面的信息共享的沟通技巧和能力。需要进行研究,以评估针对沟通技巧、沟通能力或健康沟通的干预措施,并包括对一个或多个土著社区的文化关注。质量评价使用了一个适应性的Well Living House质量评价工具。6项研究符合纳入标准,大多数研究(n = 5)从2019年开始进行。没有研究评估针对痴呆症患者、其沟通伙伴或医疗保健提供者的沟通技巧和能力的干预措施。所有纳入的研究都评估了健康沟通干预。干预措施利用了各种资源,包括针对加拿大、美国和澳大利亚各地土著社区量身定制的故事书、视频、挂图、海报、讲义、工作表、情况说明书和培训模块。有关痴呆症和痴呆症管理的内容因干预措施而异。分析确定了干预措施的主要好处和影响其有效性的三个因素:(1)土著人民、文化和语言在资源中的代表性;(2)知识共享的方法和环境;(3)沟通、联系和协作。虽然资源中的内容和信息共享方法应适合当地社区,但共同要素可支持跨土著环境的卫生传播发展。需要进一步研究制定专门针对沟通技巧的干预措施,并进行方法学上强有力的评价。