{"title":"Cereal Fibers and Satiety: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Alicia Machalias, Jessica J A Ferguson, Trish Guy, Eleanor J Beck","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Intake of cereal fiber has been linked to favorable health outcomes, such as lower body weight. Changes in perceived appetite sensations are a possible mechanism. Evidence of varied effects of different cereal fibers on satiety is conflicting.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Considering satiety as a potential mechanism to reduce dietary intake, this study aimed to systematically review the effect of higher cereal fiber intake compared with a lower-fiber control on appetite sensations and ad libitum energy intake, using visual analog scales and subsequent meal intake data.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Literature pertaining to the effects of cereal fibers on satiety outcomes was gathered through Medline, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Randomized crossover intervention studies in healthy humans assessing the effects of cereal fibers on subjective measures of appetite for a minimum of 2 hours, with ≥3-day washout periods, and that detailed the type and amount of fiber delivered for each intervention were eligible. Quality was assessed using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist and Health Canada Consistency Tool.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Evidence from 48 studies indicated that cereal fiber intake was associated with favorable effects on satiety and other measures of appetite but limited effects on ad libitum energy intake. Higher cereal fiber intake from rye and oat sources showed superior effects on appetite compared with a lower-fiber control. Wheat and barley fibers as well as functional fibers, resistant starch, and soluble corn fiber, showed a weak effect on appetite sensations and ad libitum energy intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, a higher intake of cereal fiber compared with a low-fiber control indicates positive effects on satiety measures. Further research is required to assess the influence of physicochemical properties of different cereal fiber types as well as effects of age, gender, and disease state on expression of satiety signals.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023395182.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Intake of cereal fiber has been linked to favorable health outcomes, such as lower body weight. Changes in perceived appetite sensations are a possible mechanism. Evidence of varied effects of different cereal fibers on satiety is conflicting.
Objective: Considering satiety as a potential mechanism to reduce dietary intake, this study aimed to systematically review the effect of higher cereal fiber intake compared with a lower-fiber control on appetite sensations and ad libitum energy intake, using visual analog scales and subsequent meal intake data.
Data sources: Literature pertaining to the effects of cereal fibers on satiety outcomes was gathered through Medline, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science.
Data extraction: Randomized crossover intervention studies in healthy humans assessing the effects of cereal fibers on subjective measures of appetite for a minimum of 2 hours, with ≥3-day washout periods, and that detailed the type and amount of fiber delivered for each intervention were eligible. Quality was assessed using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist and Health Canada Consistency Tool.
Data analysis: Evidence from 48 studies indicated that cereal fiber intake was associated with favorable effects on satiety and other measures of appetite but limited effects on ad libitum energy intake. Higher cereal fiber intake from rye and oat sources showed superior effects on appetite compared with a lower-fiber control. Wheat and barley fibers as well as functional fibers, resistant starch, and soluble corn fiber, showed a weak effect on appetite sensations and ad libitum energy intake.
Conclusion: Overall, a higher intake of cereal fiber compared with a low-fiber control indicates positive effects on satiety measures. Further research is required to assess the influence of physicochemical properties of different cereal fiber types as well as effects of age, gender, and disease state on expression of satiety signals.
背景：摄入谷物纤维与良好的健康结果有关，例如较低的体重。食欲感知的变化是一种可能的机制。不同谷物纤维对饱腹感的不同影响的证据是相互矛盾的。目的：考虑到饱腹感是减少膳食摄入的潜在机制，本研究旨在通过视觉模拟量表和随后的膳食摄入数据，系统回顾高谷类纤维摄入与低谷类纤维摄入对食欲感觉和随意能量摄入的影响。数据来源：通过Medline、Scopus、CINAHL Plus和Web of Science收集有关谷物纤维对饱腹感影响的文献。资料提取：在健康人群中进行的随机交叉干预研究，评估谷物纤维对食欲主观测量的影响，至少持续2小时，洗脱期≥3天，并详细说明每次干预所提供的纤维的类型和数量，均符合条件。使用营养和饮食学会质量标准检查表和加拿大卫生部一致性工具对质量进行评估。数据分析：来自48项研究的证据表明，谷物纤维的摄入与饱腹感和其他食欲指标的有利影响有关，但对随意能量摄入的影响有限。与低纤维对照相比，从黑麦和燕麦来源摄入高谷物纤维对食欲的影响更大。小麦和大麦纤维以及功能纤维、抗性淀粉和可溶性玉米纤维对食欲感觉和随意能量摄入的影响较弱。结论：总体而言，与低纤维对照组相比，高谷类纤维摄入量对饱腹感指标有积极影响。不同谷物纤维类型的理化性质以及年龄、性别、疾病状态对饱腹感信号表达的影响有待进一步研究。系统评审注册：普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42023395182。
期刊介绍：
Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
