Intraoperative vancomycin for preventing infection after open spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2025-07-11 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3171/2025.3.SPINE2547
Yifei Sun, Hariteja Ramapuram, Jovanna Tracz, Sasha Howell, Nicholas M B Laskay, James Mooney, Adeel Ilyas, Jakub Godzik
{"title":"Intraoperative vancomycin for preventing infection after open spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Yifei Sun, Hariteja Ramapuram, Jovanna Tracz, Sasha Howell, Nicholas M B Laskay, James Mooney, Adeel Ilyas, Jakub Godzik","doi":"10.3171/2025.3.SPINE2547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of prophylactic intrasite vancomycin powder in spine surgery has been described as a possible method for infection prevention. Despite clinical guidelines encouraging the use of intraoperative vancomycin for infection prophylaxis, the evidence in support of such recommendations remains unclear. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of intrawound vancomycin on deep and superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) following open spine surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to October 2024 for randomized controlled trials that investigated the association between intrawound vancomycin use and infection following open spine surgery. The results were pooled using a restricted maximum-likelihood estimation random-effects model with inverse variance weighting and Hartung-Knapp adjustment to account for variation between studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven randomized controlled trials with 2235 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1095 (49%) patients were randomized to receive intrawound vancomycin during open spine surgery. The overall rate of superficial and deep SSIs in the treatment group was 3.38%, compared with 4.08% in the control group. The overall rates of deep infection were 2.5% and 1.8% in the treatment and control groups, and the overall superficial infection rates were 0.9% and 1.8% in the treatment and control groups, respectively. In a random-effects model, intraoperative vancomycin was not associated with lower rates of SSI (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.47-1.67; p = 0.6; τ2 < 0.0001, I2 = 22%). In a subanalysis of patients who underwent instrumented spine surgery, vancomycin was also not significantly associated with decreased rates of SSI (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.38-1.57; p = 0.47; τ2 = 0.2041, I2 = 33%), superficial infections (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.22-1.57; p = 0.45; τ2 = 0, I2 = 0%), or deep infections (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.78-2.40; τ2 = 0, I2 = 0%), nor was it associated with an increased risk of gram-negative/culture-negative infection (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.47-2.06; τ2 = 0.107, I2 = 20%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative vancomycin may not be associated with significantly decreased rates of superficial or deep SSI in patients undergoing open spine surgery. The role of intraoperative vancomycin in open spine surgery warrants further study in larger randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"509-518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.3.SPINE2547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of prophylactic intrasite vancomycin powder in spine surgery has been described as a possible method for infection prevention. Despite clinical guidelines encouraging the use of intraoperative vancomycin for infection prophylaxis, the evidence in support of such recommendations remains unclear. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of intrawound vancomycin on deep and superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) following open spine surgery.

Methods: The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to October 2024 for randomized controlled trials that investigated the association between intrawound vancomycin use and infection following open spine surgery. The results were pooled using a restricted maximum-likelihood estimation random-effects model with inverse variance weighting and Hartung-Knapp adjustment to account for variation between studies.

Results: Seven randomized controlled trials with 2235 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1095 (49%) patients were randomized to receive intrawound vancomycin during open spine surgery. The overall rate of superficial and deep SSIs in the treatment group was 3.38%, compared with 4.08% in the control group. The overall rates of deep infection were 2.5% and 1.8% in the treatment and control groups, and the overall superficial infection rates were 0.9% and 1.8% in the treatment and control groups, respectively. In a random-effects model, intraoperative vancomycin was not associated with lower rates of SSI (risk ratio [RR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.47-1.67; p = 0.6; τ2 < 0.0001, I2 = 22%). In a subanalysis of patients who underwent instrumented spine surgery, vancomycin was also not significantly associated with decreased rates of SSI (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.38-1.57; p = 0.47; τ2 = 0.2041, I2 = 33%), superficial infections (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.22-1.57; p = 0.45; τ2 = 0, I2 = 0%), or deep infections (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.78-2.40; τ2 = 0, I2 = 0%), nor was it associated with an increased risk of gram-negative/culture-negative infection (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.47-2.06; τ2 = 0.107, I2 = 20%).

Conclusions: Intraoperative vancomycin may not be associated with significantly decreased rates of superficial or deep SSI in patients undergoing open spine surgery. The role of intraoperative vancomycin in open spine surgery warrants further study in larger randomized controlled trials.

术中万古霉素用于预防脊柱开放性手术后感染:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:探讨预防性万古霉素粉剂在脊柱外科手术中的应用是预防感染的一种可行方法。尽管临床指南鼓励术中使用万古霉素预防感染,但支持此类建议的证据尚不清楚。本荟萃分析的主要目的是评估伤口内万古霉素对开放脊柱手术后深部和浅表手术部位感染(ssi)的影响。方法:检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和谷歌Scholar数据库,从建立到2024年10月,检索调查开放性脊柱手术后伤口内使用万古霉素与感染之间关系的随机对照试验。使用限制性最大似然估计随机效应模型进行汇总,该模型具有逆方差加权和Hartung-Knapp调整,以解释研究之间的差异。结果:7项随机对照试验2235例患者符合纳入标准。其中,1095例(49%)患者在开放脊柱手术期间随机接受万古霉素创面内注射。治疗组浅表和深部ssi总发生率为3.38%,对照组为4.08%。治疗组和对照组深层感染率分别为2.5%和1.8%,浅表感染率分别为0.9%和1.8%。在随机效应模型中,术中万古霉素与较低的SSI发生率无关(风险比[RR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.47-1.67;P = 0.6;τ2 < 0.0001, i2 = 22%)。在接受脊柱固定手术的患者的亚组分析中,万古霉素与SSI发生率的降低也没有显著相关(RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.38-1.57;P = 0.47;τ2 = 0.2041, I2 = 33%),浅表感染(RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.22-1.57;P = 0.45;τ2 = 0, I2 = 0%)或深部感染(RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.78-2.40;τ2 = 0, I2 = 0%),也不与革兰氏阴性/培养阴性感染的风险增加相关(RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.47-2.06;τ2 = 0.107, i2 = 20%)。结论:术中万古霉素可能与脊柱开放性手术患者浅表或深部SSI发生率的显著降低无关。术中万古霉素在脊柱开放性手术中的作用值得在更大规模的随机对照试验中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信