Transactive memory system and breakthroughs: a multi‑dimensional, contextualized model for inventor teams

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Zhiwei Wang , Lican Wei , Die Hu , Wim Vanhaverbeke , Maoyan She
{"title":"Transactive memory system and breakthroughs: a multi‑dimensional, contextualized model for inventor teams","authors":"Zhiwei Wang ,&nbsp;Lican Wei ,&nbsp;Die Hu ,&nbsp;Wim Vanhaverbeke ,&nbsp;Maoyan She","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how Transactive Memory System (TMS) contributes to breakthroughs in inventor teams. From the perspective of knowledge integration, a TMS plays a crucial role in optimizing diverse expertise, facilitating effective knowledge sharing and integration, and creating innovation synergy essential for breakthroughs. We argue that the three dimensions of TMS—specialization, credibility, and coordination—differently influence breakthroughs due to their distinct roles in knowledge integration within the team. Using the U.S. pharmaceutical patent data, we identify an inverted U-shaped relationship between specialization and breakthroughs, as well as positive relationships between credibility and breakthroughs, and between coordination and breakthroughs. These relationships are moderated by technological complexity and inventor team size. By leveraging objective patent-based proxies for TMS, our study provides empirical evidence on its nuanced mechanisms and contextual contingencies, offering new insights into the micro-foundations of team-based R&amp;D collaborations and practical guidance for fostering breakthrough technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115595"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how Transactive Memory System (TMS) contributes to breakthroughs in inventor teams. From the perspective of knowledge integration, a TMS plays a crucial role in optimizing diverse expertise, facilitating effective knowledge sharing and integration, and creating innovation synergy essential for breakthroughs. We argue that the three dimensions of TMS—specialization, credibility, and coordination—differently influence breakthroughs due to their distinct roles in knowledge integration within the team. Using the U.S. pharmaceutical patent data, we identify an inverted U-shaped relationship between specialization and breakthroughs, as well as positive relationships between credibility and breakthroughs, and between coordination and breakthroughs. These relationships are moderated by technological complexity and inventor team size. By leveraging objective patent-based proxies for TMS, our study provides empirical evidence on its nuanced mechanisms and contextual contingencies, offering new insights into the micro-foundations of team-based R&D collaborations and practical guidance for fostering breakthrough technologies.
交互记忆系统和突破:发明者团队的多维、情境化模型
本研究探讨了交互记忆系统(TMS)如何促进发明人团队的突破。从知识整合的角度来看,TMS在优化多种专业知识、促进有效的知识共享和整合、创造创新协同等方面发挥着至关重要的作用。我们认为,tms的三个维度——专业化、可信度和协调性——由于它们在团队内部知识整合中的不同作用而对突破产生不同的影响。利用美国药品专利数据,我们发现专业化与突破之间存在倒u型关系,可信度与突破之间存在正相关关系,协调性与突破之间存在正相关关系。这些关系受到技术复杂性和发明人团队规模的调节。通过利用基于专利的TMS客观代理,我们的研究为其微妙的机制和情境偶然性提供了经验证据,为基于团队的研发合作的微观基础提供了新的见解,并为培育突破性技术提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信