CEASA: Dominant spatial autocorrelation in dual-constraint calibration as the game-changer for hydrological modeling with high-uncertainty remotely sensed evaporation: Application to the Meichuan basin
Yan He , Xianfeng Song , Tatsuya Nemoto , Chen Wang , Jinghao Hu , Huihui Mao , Runkui Li , Junzhi Liu , Venkatesh Raghavan , Zheng Duan
{"title":"CEASA: Dominant spatial autocorrelation in dual-constraint calibration as the game-changer for hydrological modeling with high-uncertainty remotely sensed evaporation: Application to the Meichuan basin","authors":"Yan He , Xianfeng Song , Tatsuya Nemoto , Chen Wang , Jinghao Hu , Huihui Mao , Runkui Li , Junzhi Liu , Venkatesh Raghavan , Zheng Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate evapotranspiration (ET) estimation is vital for hydrological modeling, yet remotely sensed ET (RS-ET) products are often limited by algorithmic uncertainties and sensor biases. To mitigate error propagation and better capture spatial patterns, this study introduces the Composite Efficiency of Absolute ET and Spatial Autocorrelation (CEASA) —a dual-constraint framework that integrates absolute ET magnitude and spatial autocorrelation to enhance simulation accuracy, which marks a pivotal shift by moving beyond traditional individual-value-based calibration to incorporate spatially explicit pattern constraints.</div><div>Using four RS-ET products in China’s Meichuan Basin (three high-bias: MOD16, GLASS, SSEBop; one low-bias: PMLV2), CEASA demonstrated: (1) Dual-constraint superiority: CEASA outperformed single-constraint methods. Compared to the absolute-value-only scheme (M1), it reduced PBIAS by 18–33 % and improved KGE from 0.47 to 0.51 to 0.76–0.77 under high-bias datasets, meanwhile improving KGE to 0.84 and reducing PBIAS to 9.4 % under low-bias PMLV2. It also surpassed spatial-pattern-only approaches by 11 % in KGE under low-bias data. Notably, CEASA achieved comparable streamflow accuracy to streamflow-based calibration (M0) while improving ET simulation. (2) Quality adaptivity: CEASA’s weighted dual-criteria architecture dynamically adapted to RS-ET quality—achieving peak performance for PMLV2 and maintaining stable accuracy for high-bias datasets by emphasizing spatial neighborhood information. (3) Spatial dominance: Entropy analysis showed spatial autocorrelation contributed >70 % of the optimization signal, with higher information content than absolute ET magnitude (2.85–3.42 vs. 0.39–1.22).</div><div>CEASA redefines RS-ET application by emphasizing spatial patterns, offering a bias-resilient solution for ungauged basins. Future work should explore scale-sensitive metrics and intelligent weighting schemes for broader applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"662 ","pages":"Article 133828"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425011667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate evapotranspiration (ET) estimation is vital for hydrological modeling, yet remotely sensed ET (RS-ET) products are often limited by algorithmic uncertainties and sensor biases. To mitigate error propagation and better capture spatial patterns, this study introduces the Composite Efficiency of Absolute ET and Spatial Autocorrelation (CEASA) —a dual-constraint framework that integrates absolute ET magnitude and spatial autocorrelation to enhance simulation accuracy, which marks a pivotal shift by moving beyond traditional individual-value-based calibration to incorporate spatially explicit pattern constraints.
Using four RS-ET products in China’s Meichuan Basin (three high-bias: MOD16, GLASS, SSEBop; one low-bias: PMLV2), CEASA demonstrated: (1) Dual-constraint superiority: CEASA outperformed single-constraint methods. Compared to the absolute-value-only scheme (M1), it reduced PBIAS by 18–33 % and improved KGE from 0.47 to 0.51 to 0.76–0.77 under high-bias datasets, meanwhile improving KGE to 0.84 and reducing PBIAS to 9.4 % under low-bias PMLV2. It also surpassed spatial-pattern-only approaches by 11 % in KGE under low-bias data. Notably, CEASA achieved comparable streamflow accuracy to streamflow-based calibration (M0) while improving ET simulation. (2) Quality adaptivity: CEASA’s weighted dual-criteria architecture dynamically adapted to RS-ET quality—achieving peak performance for PMLV2 and maintaining stable accuracy for high-bias datasets by emphasizing spatial neighborhood information. (3) Spatial dominance: Entropy analysis showed spatial autocorrelation contributed >70 % of the optimization signal, with higher information content than absolute ET magnitude (2.85–3.42 vs. 0.39–1.22).
CEASA redefines RS-ET application by emphasizing spatial patterns, offering a bias-resilient solution for ungauged basins. Future work should explore scale-sensitive metrics and intelligent weighting schemes for broader applicability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.