How Do People Conceptualize Narcissism and Narcissistic Individuals?

IF 2.7 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology
Sarah Smith, Travis Proulx, Geoffrey Haddock
{"title":"How Do People Conceptualize Narcissism and Narcissistic Individuals?","authors":"Sarah Smith, Travis Proulx, Geoffrey Haddock","doi":"10.1111/jopy.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionAlthough past decades have seen notable advances in the conceptualization and assessment of narcissism, scholarship examining lay conceptualizations of the construct remains limited.MethodWe report two studies utilizing bottom‐up, participant‐driven methodologies to examine public understandings of narcissism and narcissistic individuals. In Study 1 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 202), we thematically analyzed layperson definitions of narcissism and compared their central contents with widely used narcissism measures. In Study 2 (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 640), participants freely listed terms they associated with narcissistic or selfless acquaintances and rated them on a series of interpersonal dimensions (e.g., attributes, personal values).ResultsStudy 1 found that narcissism is most commonly conceptualized in relation to selfishness and vanity, and that divergences exist between public conceptualizations of narcissism and how it is operationalized in research. Study 2 found that although narcissistic acquaintances are ascribed greater grandiose relative to vulnerable traits (e.g., high extraversion, low agreeableness), they are also judged less favorably and perceived as placing greater (lesser) emphasis on self‐enhancement (self‐transcendence) values, relative to non‐narcissistic acquaintances.ConclusionThese findings broaden our knowledge of lay perspectives of narcissism and offer important theoretical (e.g., conceptualizations of narcissism) and practical implications (e.g., improving public communications regarding narcissism).","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.70008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionAlthough past decades have seen notable advances in the conceptualization and assessment of narcissism, scholarship examining lay conceptualizations of the construct remains limited.MethodWe report two studies utilizing bottom‐up, participant‐driven methodologies to examine public understandings of narcissism and narcissistic individuals. In Study 1 (n = 202), we thematically analyzed layperson definitions of narcissism and compared their central contents with widely used narcissism measures. In Study 2 (n = 640), participants freely listed terms they associated with narcissistic or selfless acquaintances and rated them on a series of interpersonal dimensions (e.g., attributes, personal values).ResultsStudy 1 found that narcissism is most commonly conceptualized in relation to selfishness and vanity, and that divergences exist between public conceptualizations of narcissism and how it is operationalized in research. Study 2 found that although narcissistic acquaintances are ascribed greater grandiose relative to vulnerable traits (e.g., high extraversion, low agreeableness), they are also judged less favorably and perceived as placing greater (lesser) emphasis on self‐enhancement (self‐transcendence) values, relative to non‐narcissistic acquaintances.ConclusionThese findings broaden our knowledge of lay perspectives of narcissism and offer important theoretical (e.g., conceptualizations of narcissism) and practical implications (e.g., improving public communications regarding narcissism).
人们如何概念化自恋和自恋个体?
虽然在过去的几十年里,自恋的概念化和评估取得了显著的进步,但研究该结构的外行概念化的学术研究仍然有限。方法我们报告了两项研究,采用自下而上、参与者驱动的方法来调查公众对自恋和自恋个体的理解。在研究1 (n = 202)中,我们从主题上分析了外行人对自恋的定义,并将其核心内容与广泛使用的自恋测量方法进行了比较。在研究2中(n = 640),参与者自由地列出他们与自恋或无私的熟人相关的术语,并根据一系列人际关系维度(例如,属性,个人价值观)对它们进行评分。研究1发现,自恋最常见的概念是与自私和虚荣有关,公众对自恋的概念和研究中对自恋的操作方式存在分歧。研究2发现,尽管自恋的熟人相对于脆弱的特征(例如,高外向性,低亲和性)被认为更浮夸,但相对于非自恋的熟人,他们也不太受欢迎,被认为更(更少)强调自我提升(自我超越)的价值观。这些发现拓宽了我们对自恋的外行视角的认识,并提供了重要的理论(例如,自恋的概念化)和实践意义(例如,改善有关自恋的公共沟通)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信