Retraining the veterans health administration's REACH VET suicide risk prediction model for patients involved in the legal system.

Esther L Meerwijk, Andrea K Finlay, Alex H S Harris
{"title":"Retraining the veterans health administration's REACH VET suicide risk prediction model for patients involved in the legal system.","authors":"Esther L Meerwijk, Andrea K Finlay, Alex H S Harris","doi":"10.1038/s44184-025-00143-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although patients with criminal legal system involvement have among the highest rates of suicide, the model that identifies patients at high risk of suicide at the United States Veterans Health Administration (VHA) does not include predictors specific to criminal legal system involvement. We explored whether the model's predictive ability would be improved (1) by retraining the model for legal-involved veterans and (2) by adding additional predictors associated with legal-involvement. For a combined outcome of suicide attempt or suicide death, the retrained models showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.124 and false negative rate (FNR) of 0.527. Adding additional predictors associated with being legal-involved did not improve predictive accuracy. Retraining the VHA suicide risk prediction model for legal-involved patients improves the model's predictive ability for this group of high-risk patients, more so than adding predictors associated with being legal-involved. A similar approach for other high-risk patients is worth exploring.</p>","PeriodicalId":74321,"journal":{"name":"Npj mental health research","volume":"4 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Npj mental health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-025-00143-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although patients with criminal legal system involvement have among the highest rates of suicide, the model that identifies patients at high risk of suicide at the United States Veterans Health Administration (VHA) does not include predictors specific to criminal legal system involvement. We explored whether the model's predictive ability would be improved (1) by retraining the model for legal-involved veterans and (2) by adding additional predictors associated with legal-involvement. For a combined outcome of suicide attempt or suicide death, the retrained models showed a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.124 and false negative rate (FNR) of 0.527. Adding additional predictors associated with being legal-involved did not improve predictive accuracy. Retraining the VHA suicide risk prediction model for legal-involved patients improves the model's predictive ability for this group of high-risk patients, more so than adding predictors associated with being legal-involved. A similar approach for other high-risk patients is worth exploring.

重新培训退伍军人健康管理局的REACH VET自杀风险预测模型,用于涉及法律系统的患者。
尽管涉及刑事法律系统的患者自杀率最高,但美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)确定自杀高风险患者的模型不包括特定于刑事法律系统的预测因子。我们探讨了模型的预测能力是否会得到改善:(1)通过对涉及法律事务的退伍军人的模型进行再训练,(2)通过添加与法律事务相关的额外预测因子。对于自杀未遂或自杀死亡的综合结果,再训练模型的阳性预测值(PPV)为0.124,假阴性率(FNR)为0.527。增加与法律相关的额外预测因素并没有提高预测的准确性。与增加与法律相关的预测因子相比,对涉及法律的患者的VHA自杀风险预测模型进行再训练可以提高该模型对这组高风险患者的预测能力。对于其他高危患者,类似的方法值得探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信