Automated classification of midpalatal suture maturation using 2D convolutional neural networks on CBCT scans.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in dental medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdmed.2025.1583455
Mahshid Nik Ravesh, Nazila Ameli, Manuel Lagravere Vich, Hollis Lai
{"title":"Automated classification of midpalatal suture maturation using 2D convolutional neural networks on CBCT scans.","authors":"Mahshid Nik Ravesh, Nazila Ameli, Manuel Lagravere Vich, Hollis Lai","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2025.1583455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate assessment of midpalatal suture (MPS) maturation is critical in orthodontics, particularly for planning treatment strategies in patients with maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD). Although cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides detailed imaging suitable for MPS classification, manual interpretation is often subjective and time-consuming.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate a lightweight two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D CNN) for the automated classification of MPS maturation stages using axial CBCT slices. A retrospective dataset of CBCT images from 111 patients was annotated based on Angelieri's classification system and grouped into three clinically relevant categories: AB (Stages A and B), C, and DE (Stages D and E). A 9-layer CNN architecture was trained and evaluated using standard classification metrics and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model achieved a test accuracy of 96.49%. Class-wise F1-scores were 0.95 for category AB, 1.00 for C, and 0.95 for DE. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) scores were 0.10 for AB, 0.62 for C, and 0.98 for DE. Lower AUC values in the early and transitional stages (AB and C) likely reflect known anatomical overlap and subjectivity in expert labeling.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings indicate that the proposed 2D CNN demonstrates high accuracy and robustness in classifying MPS maturation stages from CBCT images. Its compact architecture and strong performance suggest it is suitable for real-time clinical decision-making, particularly in identifying cases that may benefit from surgical intervention. Moreover, its lightweight design makes it adaptable for use in resource-limited settings. Future work will explore volumetric models to further enhance diagnostic reliability and confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"1583455"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2025.1583455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate assessment of midpalatal suture (MPS) maturation is critical in orthodontics, particularly for planning treatment strategies in patients with maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD). Although cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides detailed imaging suitable for MPS classification, manual interpretation is often subjective and time-consuming.

Methods: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a lightweight two-dimensional convolutional neural network (2D CNN) for the automated classification of MPS maturation stages using axial CBCT slices. A retrospective dataset of CBCT images from 111 patients was annotated based on Angelieri's classification system and grouped into three clinically relevant categories: AB (Stages A and B), C, and DE (Stages D and E). A 9-layer CNN architecture was trained and evaluated using standard classification metrics and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: The model achieved a test accuracy of 96.49%. Class-wise F1-scores were 0.95 for category AB, 1.00 for C, and 0.95 for DE. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) scores were 0.10 for AB, 0.62 for C, and 0.98 for DE. Lower AUC values in the early and transitional stages (AB and C) likely reflect known anatomical overlap and subjectivity in expert labeling.

Discussion: These findings indicate that the proposed 2D CNN demonstrates high accuracy and robustness in classifying MPS maturation stages from CBCT images. Its compact architecture and strong performance suggest it is suitable for real-time clinical decision-making, particularly in identifying cases that may benefit from surgical intervention. Moreover, its lightweight design makes it adaptable for use in resource-limited settings. Future work will explore volumetric models to further enhance diagnostic reliability and confidence.

在CBCT扫描上使用二维卷积神经网络自动分类中腭缝合成熟。
准确评估中腭缝合(MPS)成熟度在正畸治疗中至关重要,特别是对于上颌横向缺陷(MTD)患者的治疗策略规划。尽管锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)提供了适合MPS分类的详细图像,但人工解释往往是主观的和耗时的。方法:本研究旨在开发和评估一种轻量级二维卷积神经网络(2D CNN),用于使用轴向CBCT切片对MPS成熟阶段进行自动分类。基于Angelieri的分类系统对111例患者的CBCT图像进行回顾性数据集注释,并将其分为三个临床相关类别:AB (A期和B期),C和DE (D期和E期)。使用标准分类指标和接收者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析对9层CNN架构进行训练和评估。结果:该模型的检测准确率为96.49%。AB类的分类f1得分为0.95,C类为1.00,DE类为0.95。AB类的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)得分为0.10,C类为0.62,DE类为0.98。早期和过渡阶段(AB和C)较低的AUC值可能反映了已知的解剖重叠和专家标记的主导性。讨论:这些发现表明,所提出的二维CNN在从CBCT图像中分类MPS成熟阶段方面具有很高的准确性和鲁棒性。其紧凑的结构和强大的性能表明它适合于实时临床决策,特别是在确定可能受益于手术干预的病例时。此外,它的轻量级设计使其适合在资源有限的环境中使用。未来的工作将探索体积模型,以进一步提高诊断的可靠性和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信