Xiao Zhang, Wenyi Yang, Jingxin Wang, Limei Ai, Min Chen, Chunping Wang, Xia Wan
{"title":"Reallocating diabetes-related garbage codes to improve mortality estimates: a case study in Weifang, China.","authors":"Xiao Zhang, Wenyi Yang, Jingxin Wang, Limei Ai, Min Chen, Chunping Wang, Xia Wan","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00399-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective identification and correction of diabetes mellitus (DM)-related garbage codes (GCs) in mortality surveillance data is crucial for accurately estimating regional DM mortality rates. This study applied a structured, three-step approach-using standard WHO ICD-10 mortality coding rules, coarsened exact matching (CEMM), and fixed proportion reassignment (FPRM)-to redistribute diabetes-related GCs in Weifang's mortality data (2010-2022). Using ICD-10 coding rules, we reclassified 29 deaths originally assigned to DM as the underlying cause of death (UCD) to other causes, and reassigned 1,945 records previously not attributed to DM to DM as the UCD. CEMM then reclassified 283 DM-related GC records to DM, followed by FPRM, which reassigned 160 \"unknown cause\" records to DM. Together, these steps increased the number of DM deaths by 22.82%. Based on the reallocated data, crude DM mortality rates rose from 7.64 to 17.75 per 100,000 between 2010 and 2022, with males experiencing a greater overall increase than females. While no new algorithms were developed, this study demonstrates how internationally recommended coding standards-often neglected in routine subnational settings-can be systematically and rigorously applied to improve DM mortality surveillance. This work highlights operational gaps in local death certification and presents a replicable protocol for enhancing mortality data reliability using existing tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12247368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00399-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective identification and correction of diabetes mellitus (DM)-related garbage codes (GCs) in mortality surveillance data is crucial for accurately estimating regional DM mortality rates. This study applied a structured, three-step approach-using standard WHO ICD-10 mortality coding rules, coarsened exact matching (CEMM), and fixed proportion reassignment (FPRM)-to redistribute diabetes-related GCs in Weifang's mortality data (2010-2022). Using ICD-10 coding rules, we reclassified 29 deaths originally assigned to DM as the underlying cause of death (UCD) to other causes, and reassigned 1,945 records previously not attributed to DM to DM as the UCD. CEMM then reclassified 283 DM-related GC records to DM, followed by FPRM, which reassigned 160 "unknown cause" records to DM. Together, these steps increased the number of DM deaths by 22.82%. Based on the reallocated data, crude DM mortality rates rose from 7.64 to 17.75 per 100,000 between 2010 and 2022, with males experiencing a greater overall increase than females. While no new algorithms were developed, this study demonstrates how internationally recommended coding standards-often neglected in routine subnational settings-can be systematically and rigorously applied to improve DM mortality surveillance. This work highlights operational gaps in local death certification and presents a replicable protocol for enhancing mortality data reliability using existing tools.
期刊介绍:
Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.