MICA for all hallux valgus severity grades: A retrospective outcome study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Michael Michlin, Mor Bracha Akselrad, Ophir Freund, Yaron Brin, Ezequiel Palmanovich, Nissim Ohana
{"title":"MICA for all hallux valgus severity grades: A retrospective outcome study.","authors":"Michael Michlin, Mor Bracha Akselrad, Ophir Freund, Yaron Brin, Ezequiel Palmanovich, Nissim Ohana","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2025.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical treatment for hallux valgus (HV) has traditionally been guided by deformity severity. Severe HV was typically addressed with proximal corrections, while mild to moderate cases received distal osteotomies. Recent studies suggest that even severe HV can be effectively managed using minimally invasive distal techniques.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Chevron and Akin (MICA) procedure across HV severity grades and assess the relevance of traditional severity-based classification in surgical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective clinical measurement study with radiographic and patient-reported outcomes analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study included 120 feet (111 patients) treated with MICA for isolated HV between 2016 and 2022. Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were assessed with a minimum two-year follow-up. Deformities were classified as severe or non-severe (mild-moderate) based on standard angular thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two cases (26.7 %) were classified as severe and 88 (73.3 %) as non-severe. Median (IQR) pre-operative and post-operative first intermetatarsal angles (IMA1) were 14.0 (11-16) and 2.6 (1.3-4.8) degrees, respectively. Median pre-operative and post-operative hallux valgus angles (HVA) were 31.2 (26-38) and 8.8 (4.2-11.6) degrees. Median EFAS scores were 19 for severe and 22 for non-severe groups (p = .228). Satisfaction rates were comparable with 84 % in the severe group and 83 % in the non-severe group. PROMs were not associated with preoperative HV severity (p > .1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MICA is effective across all HV severity grades, challenging the need for traditional severity-based classification in surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2025.06.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical treatment for hallux valgus (HV) has traditionally been guided by deformity severity. Severe HV was typically addressed with proximal corrections, while mild to moderate cases received distal osteotomies. Recent studies suggest that even severe HV can be effectively managed using minimally invasive distal techniques.

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Chevron and Akin (MICA) procedure across HV severity grades and assess the relevance of traditional severity-based classification in surgical decision-making.

Study design: Retrospective clinical measurement study with radiographic and patient-reported outcomes analysis.

Methods: A single-center retrospective study included 120 feet (111 patients) treated with MICA for isolated HV between 2016 and 2022. Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were assessed with a minimum two-year follow-up. Deformities were classified as severe or non-severe (mild-moderate) based on standard angular thresholds.

Results: Thirty-two cases (26.7 %) were classified as severe and 88 (73.3 %) as non-severe. Median (IQR) pre-operative and post-operative first intermetatarsal angles (IMA1) were 14.0 (11-16) and 2.6 (1.3-4.8) degrees, respectively. Median pre-operative and post-operative hallux valgus angles (HVA) were 31.2 (26-38) and 8.8 (4.2-11.6) degrees. Median EFAS scores were 19 for severe and 22 for non-severe groups (p = .228). Satisfaction rates were comparable with 84 % in the severe group and 83 % in the non-severe group. PROMs were not associated with preoperative HV severity (p > .1).

Conclusion: MICA is effective across all HV severity grades, challenging the need for traditional severity-based classification in surgical planning.

MICA用于所有拇外翻严重程度分级:一项回顾性结果研究。
背景:拇外翻(HV)的手术治疗传统上以畸形严重程度为指导。严重的HV通常通过近端矫正来解决,而轻度至中度的病例则接受远端截骨。最近的研究表明,即使是严重的HV也可以使用微创远端技术有效地治疗。目的:评估微创Chevron and Akin (MICA)手术在HV严重程度分级中的效果,并评估传统的基于严重程度分类在手术决策中的相关性。研究设计:回顾性临床测量研究,包括影像学和患者报告的结果分析。方法:一项单中心回顾性研究,包括2016年至2022年间使用MICA治疗孤立性HV的120英尺(111例患者)。通过至少两年的随访评估放射学和患者报告结果测量(PROMs)。根据标准角度阈值将畸形分为严重或非严重(轻度-中度)。结果:重度32例(26.7%),非重度88例(73.3%)。中位(IQR)术前和术后第一跖间角(IMA1)分别为14.0(11-16)度和2.6(1.3-4.8)度。术前、术后拇外翻角(HVA)中位数分别为31.2(26 ~ 38)度和8.8(4.2 ~ 11.6)度。严重组EFAS评分中位数为19分,非严重组为22分(p = .228)。重度组的满意率为84%,非重度组为83%。PROMs与术前HV严重程度无关(p < 0.01)。结论:MICA在所有的HV严重程度分级中都是有效的,挑战了传统的基于严重程度的手术计划分类的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信