Comparison of communicative-linguistic indices between Late Talkers and typically developing children through the Dynamic Communication Evaluation coding scheme.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Claudia Maggiulli, Laura Zampini, Martina Paini, Elisa Granocchio, Daniela Sarti
{"title":"Comparison of communicative-linguistic indices between Late Talkers and typically developing children through the Dynamic Communication Evaluation coding scheme.","authors":"Claudia Maggiulli, Laura Zampini, Martina Paini, Elisa Granocchio, Daniela Sarti","doi":"10.1080/02699206.2025.2517322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Late Talkers (LTs) are at risk for persistent developmental language disorders and show a slowdown in the acquisition of both language and communication skills. The Dynamic Communication Evaluation (DCE) is an event-based coding scheme for the analysis of intentional communicative acts produced via parental interaction, including categories of socio-communicative pragmatics and structural linguistic complexity. This cross-sectional observational study compares the communicative-linguistic competencies detected through the DCE of LTs with those of typical development children. The participants included 19 LT children (24-38 months old) with a vocabulary size lower than the 5th percentile on the Italian version of the MacArthur-Bates CDI, and the findings were compared to the performance of 19 typically developing (TD) children (25-37 months old). The groups were matched for chronological age. Correlations between communicative and linguistic labels and age were found in the LT group in greater numbers than in the TD group. A comparison between the two groups revealed lower abilities in LT than TD children in communicative-pragmatic indices - such as joint attention, responsiveness, and request of information - and in linguistic indices. Socio-communicative pragmatic, lexical, morphosyntactic, and phonological skills influenced each other during development in children with slow language emergence. The findings have clinical implications regarding early identification. Systematic observations appear to have clinical value because they support quantitative and qualitative data collection and guide intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":49219,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2025.2517322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Late Talkers (LTs) are at risk for persistent developmental language disorders and show a slowdown in the acquisition of both language and communication skills. The Dynamic Communication Evaluation (DCE) is an event-based coding scheme for the analysis of intentional communicative acts produced via parental interaction, including categories of socio-communicative pragmatics and structural linguistic complexity. This cross-sectional observational study compares the communicative-linguistic competencies detected through the DCE of LTs with those of typical development children. The participants included 19 LT children (24-38 months old) with a vocabulary size lower than the 5th percentile on the Italian version of the MacArthur-Bates CDI, and the findings were compared to the performance of 19 typically developing (TD) children (25-37 months old). The groups were matched for chronological age. Correlations between communicative and linguistic labels and age were found in the LT group in greater numbers than in the TD group. A comparison between the two groups revealed lower abilities in LT than TD children in communicative-pragmatic indices - such as joint attention, responsiveness, and request of information - and in linguistic indices. Socio-communicative pragmatic, lexical, morphosyntactic, and phonological skills influenced each other during development in children with slow language emergence. The findings have clinical implications regarding early identification. Systematic observations appear to have clinical value because they support quantitative and qualitative data collection and guide intervention.

动态交流评价编码方案下晚语者与正常发育儿童交流语言指标的比较。
晚说话者(LTs)存在持续性发育性语言障碍的风险,并且在语言和沟通技能的习得方面表现出缓慢。动态交际评价(DCE)是一种基于事件的编码方案,用于分析父母互动产生的有意交际行为,包括社会交际语用学类别和结构语言复杂性。本横断面观察性研究比较了通过DCE检测的ltt与正常发育儿童的交际语言能力。参与者包括19名词汇量低于意大利版麦克阿瑟-贝茨CDI第5百分位的LT儿童(24-38个月),并将研究结果与19名正常发育(TD)儿童(25-37个月)的表现进行比较。各组按实际年龄进行匹配。交际和语言标签与年龄之间的相关性在LT组中比在TD组中更多。两组之间的比较显示,低语言障碍儿童在交际语用指标(如共同注意、反应和信息请求)和语言指标上的能力低于低语言障碍儿童。社会交际语用、词汇、形态句法和语音技能在语言出现缓慢儿童的发展过程中相互影响。研究结果对早期识别具有临床意义。系统观察似乎具有临床价值,因为它们支持定量和定性数据收集并指导干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics encompasses the following: Linguistics and phonetics of disorders of speech and language; Contribution of data from communication disorders to theories of speech production and perception; Research on communication disorders in multilingual populations, and in under-researched populations, and languages other than English; Pragmatic aspects of speech and language disorders; Clinical dialectology and sociolinguistics; Childhood, adolescent and adult disorders of communication; Linguistics and phonetics of hearing impairment, sign language and lip-reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信