Impact of 3D Reconstruction and Printing on Surgical Outcomes in Renal Tumour Surgery.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Daniel Campos-Valverde, José Ramón Muñoz-Rodríguez, Paz Castro Fernández, David López Sánchez, Gonzalo Bueno Serrano, Francisco J Damas Arroyo, Manuel Pérez-Utrilla, Santiago Pérez Cadavid, David Grande Murillo, Ana García Torres, David Higuero Acevedo, María Casa Valencia, María Pilar Alcoba García, Alba Lara Isla, Alejandro Puerto Puerto, Carmen Gonzalez Enguita, Francisco Javier Redondo Calvo
{"title":"Impact of 3D Reconstruction and Printing on Surgical Outcomes in Renal Tumour Surgery.","authors":"Daniel Campos-Valverde, José Ramón Muñoz-Rodríguez, Paz Castro Fernández, David López Sánchez, Gonzalo Bueno Serrano, Francisco J Damas Arroyo, Manuel Pérez-Utrilla, Santiago Pérez Cadavid, David Grande Murillo, Ana García Torres, David Higuero Acevedo, María Casa Valencia, María Pilar Alcoba García, Alba Lara Isla, Alejandro Puerto Puerto, Carmen Gonzalez Enguita, Francisco Javier Redondo Calvo","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257805.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>With the advances in imaging technology that have enabled the widespread adoption of nephron-sparing surgical techniques, the incidence of renal tumours has concurrently risen. Current guidelines recommend partial nephrectomy for all tumours smaller than 7 cm and, when feasible, even for larger lesions. However, the increasing use of nephron-sparing surgery and advancements in imaging have highlighted the substantial variability in renal hilar anatomy, which poses challenges during surgical procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging technology integrated into preoperative planning has been proposed as a complement to conventional radiological studies to address this complexity. This study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative 3D imaging and printing on the surgical management of renal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 37 patients managed according to standard clinical protocols. The patients were divided into two groups: One group underwent preoperative 3D tumour reconstruction and printing, and the other did not. Key surgical outcomes, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, need for transfusion and status of surgical margins on pathological examination, were assessed. All 3D models were reconstructed and printed using polylactic acid (PLA) by the same urologist to ensure consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group that received preoperative 3D reconstruction demonstrated remarkable reductions in intraoperative blood loss and operative time, with no cases of positive surgical margins. No significant differences in tumour size, renal nephrometry index or surgery performed were observed between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incorporation of 3D printing and reconstruction into the surgical planning of renal tumours offers tangible benefits, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, short operative duration and enhanced oncological outcomes by minimising the risk of positive margins. These findings support the potential of 3D technology as a valuable adjunct to traditional preoperative assessment in oncological renal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 5","pages":"534-540"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257805.72","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: With the advances in imaging technology that have enabled the widespread adoption of nephron-sparing surgical techniques, the incidence of renal tumours has concurrently risen. Current guidelines recommend partial nephrectomy for all tumours smaller than 7 cm and, when feasible, even for larger lesions. However, the increasing use of nephron-sparing surgery and advancements in imaging have highlighted the substantial variability in renal hilar anatomy, which poses challenges during surgical procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging technology integrated into preoperative planning has been proposed as a complement to conventional radiological studies to address this complexity. This study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative 3D imaging and printing on the surgical management of renal cancer.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 37 patients managed according to standard clinical protocols. The patients were divided into two groups: One group underwent preoperative 3D tumour reconstruction and printing, and the other did not. Key surgical outcomes, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, need for transfusion and status of surgical margins on pathological examination, were assessed. All 3D models were reconstructed and printed using polylactic acid (PLA) by the same urologist to ensure consistency.

Results: The group that received preoperative 3D reconstruction demonstrated remarkable reductions in intraoperative blood loss and operative time, with no cases of positive surgical margins. No significant differences in tumour size, renal nephrometry index or surgery performed were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions: The incorporation of 3D printing and reconstruction into the surgical planning of renal tumours offers tangible benefits, including reduced intraoperative blood loss, short operative duration and enhanced oncological outcomes by minimising the risk of positive margins. These findings support the potential of 3D technology as a valuable adjunct to traditional preoperative assessment in oncological renal surgery.

3D重建和打印对肾肿瘤手术效果的影响。
背景和目的:随着影像技术的进步,保留肾单元的手术技术得到广泛应用,肾脏肿瘤的发病率也随之上升。目前的指南建议对所有小于7厘米的肿瘤进行部分切除,如果可行,甚至对较大的病变也可以进行部分切除。然而,越来越多的保留肾单元的手术和成像技术的进步强调了肾门解剖结构的巨大变异性,这给外科手术带来了挑战。三维(3D)成像技术集成到术前计划中,作为传统放射学研究的补充,以解决这种复杂性。本研究旨在评估术前3D成像和打印对肾癌手术治疗的影响。方法:对37例患者进行前瞻性队列研究,按照标准临床方案进行管理。患者分为两组:一组术前进行肿瘤3D重建和打印,另一组未进行3D打印。评估主要手术结果,包括手术时间、术中出血量、输血需求和手术切缘病理检查状态。所有的3D模型都是由同一泌尿科医生用聚乳酸(PLA)重建和打印的,以确保一致性。结果:术前3D重建组术中出血量和手术时间明显减少,无手术切缘阳性病例。两组患者在肿瘤大小、肾测量指标和手术情况上均无显著差异。结论:将3D打印和重建技术结合到肾肿瘤的手术计划中可以带来切实的好处,包括减少术中出血量,缩短手术时间,通过将阳性边缘的风险降至最低,提高肿瘤预后。这些发现支持了3D技术作为传统肾肿瘤手术术前评估的一种有价值的辅助手段的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信