The impact of aminoglycoside exposure on soil and plant root-associated microbiota: a meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jessica L Coates, Ashanti J Lawson, Kathleen Bostick, Mentewab Ayalew
{"title":"The impact of aminoglycoside exposure on soil and plant root-associated microbiota: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Jessica L Coates, Ashanti J Lawson, Kathleen Bostick, Mentewab Ayalew","doi":"10.1186/s13750-025-00365-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exposure to aminoglycosides, a class of potent bactericidal antibiotics naturally produced by soil microorganisms and commonly used in agriculture, has the potential to cause shifts in the population dynamics of microorganisms that impact plant and soil health. In particular, aminoglycoside exposure could result in alterations of the soil and plant root-associated bacterial species diversity and richness due to their potent inhibitory action on microbial growth, the creation of selective conditions for the proliferation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or a reduction in the ability to suppress soil pathogens. Previous studies have attempted to understand the relationship between aminoglycoside exposure and the plant-associated microbiota with varying results. Thus, this systematic review aims to survey all relevant published data to answer the question, \"What is the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on the soil and plant root-associated microbiota?\"</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched 5 academic databases and 1 specialist organization database for scientific journal publications written in any language. Articles were included based on the criteria described in Coates et al., 2022. Included studies were subject to critical appraisal using the CEE Critical Appraisal Tool Version 0.2 (Prototype) to evaluate their susceptibility to confounding factors, misclassification bias, selection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias and analysis bias. Studies deemed to be high risk based on critical appraisal results were excluded from further analysis. Descriptive data analysis was performed for studies considered low or unclear for risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted for antibiotic resistance and microbial diversity.</p><p><strong>Review findings: </strong>Out of 8370 screened records, 50 articles fulfilled the search criteria, and from these, 13 studies were included in meta-analysis. Most studies investigated the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on soil microbiota (93%) in a laboratory setting (62%), primarily from the United States (32%), China (24%), France, Switzerland and Germany (8%). A limited number of studies investigated the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on disease suppression, so it was excluded from meta-analysis. Therefore, our synthesis primarily details the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on the microbial diversity and antibiotic resistance of the soil microbiota. Overall, exposure to aminoglycosides did not result in a significant change in the microbial diversity. However, soil use, pH, and type of aminoglycoside used could be potential modifiers. Additionally, we observed an average 7% of the microbial population exhibiting resistance to aminoglycosides, with the relationship between the exposure concentration and the selection concentration emerging as a potential modifier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current research is limited by gaps in understanding the relationship between aminoglycoside exposure, microbial community dynamics, and disease suppression, as well as by insufficient data on less-studied aminoglycosides and key confounding factors. Current research also suggests a potential relationship between antibiotic concentrations used for exposure and selection of resistant bacteria. These findings emphasize the need for informed antibiotic management policies and rigorous, targeted research to better understand the relationship between soil factors and antibiotic concentrations used on the impact of aminoglycosides on soil microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":48621,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Evidence","volume":"14 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-025-00365-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exposure to aminoglycosides, a class of potent bactericidal antibiotics naturally produced by soil microorganisms and commonly used in agriculture, has the potential to cause shifts in the population dynamics of microorganisms that impact plant and soil health. In particular, aminoglycoside exposure could result in alterations of the soil and plant root-associated bacterial species diversity and richness due to their potent inhibitory action on microbial growth, the creation of selective conditions for the proliferation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or a reduction in the ability to suppress soil pathogens. Previous studies have attempted to understand the relationship between aminoglycoside exposure and the plant-associated microbiota with varying results. Thus, this systematic review aims to survey all relevant published data to answer the question, "What is the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on the soil and plant root-associated microbiota?"

Methods: We searched 5 academic databases and 1 specialist organization database for scientific journal publications written in any language. Articles were included based on the criteria described in Coates et al., 2022. Included studies were subject to critical appraisal using the CEE Critical Appraisal Tool Version 0.2 (Prototype) to evaluate their susceptibility to confounding factors, misclassification bias, selection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias and analysis bias. Studies deemed to be high risk based on critical appraisal results were excluded from further analysis. Descriptive data analysis was performed for studies considered low or unclear for risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted for antibiotic resistance and microbial diversity.

Review findings: Out of 8370 screened records, 50 articles fulfilled the search criteria, and from these, 13 studies were included in meta-analysis. Most studies investigated the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on soil microbiota (93%) in a laboratory setting (62%), primarily from the United States (32%), China (24%), France, Switzerland and Germany (8%). A limited number of studies investigated the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on disease suppression, so it was excluded from meta-analysis. Therefore, our synthesis primarily details the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on the microbial diversity and antibiotic resistance of the soil microbiota. Overall, exposure to aminoglycosides did not result in a significant change in the microbial diversity. However, soil use, pH, and type of aminoglycoside used could be potential modifiers. Additionally, we observed an average 7% of the microbial population exhibiting resistance to aminoglycosides, with the relationship between the exposure concentration and the selection concentration emerging as a potential modifier.

Conclusions: Current research is limited by gaps in understanding the relationship between aminoglycoside exposure, microbial community dynamics, and disease suppression, as well as by insufficient data on less-studied aminoglycosides and key confounding factors. Current research also suggests a potential relationship between antibiotic concentrations used for exposure and selection of resistant bacteria. These findings emphasize the need for informed antibiotic management policies and rigorous, targeted research to better understand the relationship between soil factors and antibiotic concentrations used on the impact of aminoglycosides on soil microbiota.

氨基糖苷暴露对土壤和植物根相关微生物群的影响:一项荟萃分析。
背景:氨基糖苷是一类由土壤微生物自然产生的强效杀菌抗生素,通常用于农业,暴露于氨基糖苷有可能导致影响植物和土壤健康的微生物种群动态的变化。特别是,氨基糖苷暴露可能导致土壤和植物根部相关细菌物种多样性和丰富度的改变,因为它们对微生物生长具有有效的抑制作用,为抗生素抗性细菌的增殖创造选择性条件,或抑制土壤病原体的能力降低。以前的研究试图了解氨基糖苷暴露与植物相关微生物群之间的关系,但结果不同。因此,本系统综述旨在调查所有相关的已发表数据,以回答这个问题,“氨基糖苷暴露对土壤和植物根系相关微生物群的影响是什么?”方法:检索5个学术数据库和1个专业组织数据库,检索各种语言的科学期刊出版物。根据Coates et al., 2022中描述的标准纳入文章。使用CEE关键评估工具0.2版(原型)对纳入的研究进行批判性评估,以评估其对混杂因素、错误分类偏差、选择偏差、流失偏差、报告偏差和分析偏差的易感性。根据关键评价结果被认为是高风险的研究被排除在进一步分析之外。对偏倚风险低或不明确的研究进行描述性数据分析。对抗生素耐药性和微生物多样性进行了荟萃分析。综述结果:在8370份筛选记录中,有50篇文章符合检索标准,其中13项研究被纳入meta分析。大多数研究在实验室环境中调查了氨基糖苷暴露对土壤微生物群的影响(93%)(62%),主要来自美国(32%)、中国(24%)、法国、瑞士和德国(8%)。有限数量的研究调查了氨基糖苷暴露对疾病抑制的影响,因此它被排除在meta分析之外。因此,我们的合成主要详细介绍了氨基糖苷暴露对土壤微生物群的微生物多样性和抗生素耐药性的影响。总的来说,暴露于氨基糖苷并没有导致微生物多样性的显著变化。然而,土壤的使用、pH值和氨基糖苷的类型可能是潜在的改性剂。此外,我们观察到平均7%的微生物种群表现出对氨基糖苷的抗性,暴露浓度和选择浓度之间的关系成为潜在的修饰因素。结论:目前的研究受限于对氨基糖苷暴露、微生物群落动态和疾病抑制之间关系的理解存在差距,以及对较少研究的氨基糖苷和关键混杂因素的数据不足。目前的研究还表明,用于暴露的抗生素浓度与耐药细菌的选择之间存在潜在的关系。这些发现强调需要制定明智的抗生素管理政策和严格的、有针对性的研究,以更好地了解土壤因素和抗生素浓度对氨基糖苷类抗生素对土壤微生物群的影响之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Evidence
Environmental Evidence Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
36
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Evidence is the journal of the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE). The Journal facilitates rapid publication of evidence syntheses, in the form of Systematic Reviews and Maps conducted to CEE Guidelines and Standards. We focus on the effectiveness of environmental management interventions and the impact of human activities on the environment. Our scope covers all forms of environmental management and human impacts and therefore spans the natural and social sciences. Subjects include water security, agriculture, food security, forestry, fisheries, natural resource management, biodiversity conservation, climate change, ecosystem services, pollution, invasive species, environment and human wellbeing, sustainable energy use, soil management, environmental legislation, environmental education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信