Continuity in social communication development among school-aged siblings of autistic children.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Devon N Gangi, Ana-Maria Iosif, Shyeena Maqbool, Monique M Hill, Chandni Parikh, Gregory S Young, Sally Ozonoff
{"title":"Continuity in social communication development among school-aged siblings of autistic children.","authors":"Devon N Gangi, Ana-Maria Iosif, Shyeena Maqbool, Monique M Hill, Chandni Parikh, Gregory S Young, Sally Ozonoff","doi":"10.1037/dev0002025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prospective studies of later born siblings of autistic individuals often focus on predicting autism diagnosis. Studies concentrating on siblings who do not develop autism have found subclinical atypicalities in some children as early as the first year of life. However, when followed to school-age, the continuity of these findings has been mixed. We tracked nonautistic siblings (<i>n</i> = 151 higher familial likelihood of autism, <i>n</i> = 115 lower likelihood) longitudinally from infancy to 6-16 years of age when participants completed a battery of social communication measures (parent report and direct observation/administration). Using latent profile analysis, we derived groupings based on patterns of performance across measures. Three groups were identified: <i>Class 1</i> (45.5%), <i>Class 2</i> (45.2%), and <i>Class 3</i> (9.3%)-characterized by higher, intermediate, and lower school-age social communication abilities, respectively. We then examined the performance of these classes on independent measures of pragmatic language, reciprocal social interaction, and cognition. <i>Class 3</i> demonstrated social communication differences that were most evident with novel interactive partners (e.g., examiners) and scored lower on IQ and academic achievement measures, indicating that social communication differences captured by the latent profile analysis were part of a broader pattern of developmental differences. Using data collected in the first 3 years of life, we found that the school-age classes began showing differences by 12-18 months of age-evidence of continuity between early behavior and later development. Findings suggest that when early childhood challenges are observed in siblings of autistic children, even those not meeting criteria for autism, they should be monitored over time and additional support offered as needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0002025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prospective studies of later born siblings of autistic individuals often focus on predicting autism diagnosis. Studies concentrating on siblings who do not develop autism have found subclinical atypicalities in some children as early as the first year of life. However, when followed to school-age, the continuity of these findings has been mixed. We tracked nonautistic siblings (n = 151 higher familial likelihood of autism, n = 115 lower likelihood) longitudinally from infancy to 6-16 years of age when participants completed a battery of social communication measures (parent report and direct observation/administration). Using latent profile analysis, we derived groupings based on patterns of performance across measures. Three groups were identified: Class 1 (45.5%), Class 2 (45.2%), and Class 3 (9.3%)-characterized by higher, intermediate, and lower school-age social communication abilities, respectively. We then examined the performance of these classes on independent measures of pragmatic language, reciprocal social interaction, and cognition. Class 3 demonstrated social communication differences that were most evident with novel interactive partners (e.g., examiners) and scored lower on IQ and academic achievement measures, indicating that social communication differences captured by the latent profile analysis were part of a broader pattern of developmental differences. Using data collected in the first 3 years of life, we found that the school-age classes began showing differences by 12-18 months of age-evidence of continuity between early behavior and later development. Findings suggest that when early childhood challenges are observed in siblings of autistic children, even those not meeting criteria for autism, they should be monitored over time and additional support offered as needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

自闭症儿童学龄兄弟姐妹社会沟通发展的连续性。
对自闭症患者较晚出生的兄弟姐妹进行的前瞻性研究往往侧重于预测自闭症的诊断。对未患自闭症的兄弟姐妹进行的研究发现,一些孩子早在出生后第一年就出现了亚临床非典型性。然而,当追踪到学龄时,这些发现的连续性就有好有坏了。我们跟踪了从婴儿期到6-16岁的非自闭症兄弟姐妹(n = 151高自闭症家庭可能性,n = 115低自闭症家庭可能性),当参与者完成一系列社会沟通测量(父母报告和直接观察/管理)。使用潜在轮廓分析,我们根据不同措施的表现模式得出分组。三组被确定为:1班(45.5%),2班(45.2%)和3班(9.3%)-分别具有较高,中等和较低学龄社会沟通能力。然后,我们检查了这些班级在语用语言、互惠社会互动和认知方面的独立指标的表现。第三班的社会沟通差异在新的互动伙伴(如考官)身上表现得最为明显,在智商和学业成绩方面得分较低,这表明潜在特征分析所捕捉到的社会沟通差异是更广泛的发展差异模式的一部分。通过收集3岁前的数据,我们发现学龄班在12-18个月大的时候开始表现出差异——早期行为和后期发展之间的连续性。研究结果表明,当在自闭症儿童的兄弟姐妹中观察到早期儿童挑战时,即使是那些不符合自闭症标准的孩子,也应该长期监测,并根据需要提供额外的支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信