A decade-long prospective analysis of the learning curve after 435 robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies from a single tertiary institution.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Maria Christodoulou, Tara M Pattilachan, Iswanto Sucandy, Jared Thompson, Sharona B Ross
{"title":"A decade-long prospective analysis of the learning curve after 435 robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies from a single tertiary institution.","authors":"Maria Christodoulou, Tara M Pattilachan, Iswanto Sucandy, Jared Thompson, Sharona B Ross","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02553-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has emerged as a leading approach in complex pancreatic surgery, but the path to proficiency is steep. While early learning curve assessments are available for simpler robotic procedures, few studies quantify the extended time and caseload needed to achieve consistency and mastery in robotic PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With IRB approval, we prospectively followed 435 patients who underwent robotic PD between 2013 and 2024. The learning curve was assessed using Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis based on operative time. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD), and statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CUSUM analysis identified the turning point for consistent procedural proficiency at 88 cases. Patient characteristics included a median age of 70 (68 ± 10.9) years, BMI of 27 (27 ± 5.1) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and a predominance of males (54%). A total of 253 patients (58%) had previous abdominal surgery, 36 (8%) had undergone neoadjuvant therapy, and average ASA class and Charlson Comorbidity Index were 3 (± 3) and 5 (± 1.5), respectively. Over time, operative efficiency translated into improved outcomes: unplanned conversions to open surgery declined significantly (p < 0.0001), estimated blood loss decreased (p = 0.04), and hospital stays shortened (p = 0.008). Interestingly, despite growing proficiency, operative times increased (p < 0.0001), reflecting a shift toward more technically demanding cases. A significant rise was also observed in the proportion of patients with prior abdominal surgeries treated after the learning curve milestone (p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>True mastery in robotic PD demands extended experience, with significant procedural gains occurring after the 88-case mark. This extended learning curve should be acknowledged when designing training programs and evaluating surgical outcomes in robotic pancreatic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02553-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has emerged as a leading approach in complex pancreatic surgery, but the path to proficiency is steep. While early learning curve assessments are available for simpler robotic procedures, few studies quantify the extended time and caseload needed to achieve consistency and mastery in robotic PD.

Methods: With IRB approval, we prospectively followed 435 patients who underwent robotic PD between 2013 and 2024. The learning curve was assessed using Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis based on operative time. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD), and statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results: CUSUM analysis identified the turning point for consistent procedural proficiency at 88 cases. Patient characteristics included a median age of 70 (68 ± 10.9) years, BMI of 27 (27 ± 5.1) kg/m2, and a predominance of males (54%). A total of 253 patients (58%) had previous abdominal surgery, 36 (8%) had undergone neoadjuvant therapy, and average ASA class and Charlson Comorbidity Index were 3 (± 3) and 5 (± 1.5), respectively. Over time, operative efficiency translated into improved outcomes: unplanned conversions to open surgery declined significantly (p < 0.0001), estimated blood loss decreased (p = 0.04), and hospital stays shortened (p = 0.008). Interestingly, despite growing proficiency, operative times increased (p < 0.0001), reflecting a shift toward more technically demanding cases. A significant rise was also observed in the proportion of patients with prior abdominal surgeries treated after the learning curve milestone (p = 0.007).

Conclusions: True mastery in robotic PD demands extended experience, with significant procedural gains occurring after the 88-case mark. This extended learning curve should be acknowledged when designing training programs and evaluating surgical outcomes in robotic pancreatic surgery.

对一所高等院校435例机器人胰十二指肠切除术后学习曲线长达十年的前瞻性分析。
机器人胰十二指肠切除术(PD)已成为复杂胰腺手术的主要方法,但熟练的道路是陡峭的。虽然早期学习曲线评估可用于更简单的机器人程序,但很少有研究量化实现机器人PD一致性和掌握所需的延长时间和病例量。方法:经IRB批准,我们前瞻性随访了2013年至2024年间接受机器人PD治疗的435例患者。采用基于手术时间的累积和(CUSUM)分析评估学习曲线。数据以中位数(mean±SD)表示,p≤0.05为有统计学意义。结果:CUSUM分析确定了88例手术熟练度的转折点。患者的中位年龄为70(68±10.9)岁,BMI为27(27±5.1)kg/m2,男性居多(54%)。253例(58%)患者既往有腹部手术史,36例(8%)患者接受过新辅助治疗,ASA分级和Charlson合并症指数平均分别为3(±3)和5(±1.5)。随着时间的推移,手术效率转化为改善的结果:非计划转换为开放手术的情况显著下降(p结论:真正掌握机器人PD需要丰富的经验,在88例标志之后出现显著的手术收益。在设计培训计划和评估机器人胰腺手术的手术效果时,应该认识到这种延长的学习曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信