To Be or Not to Be-That Is the Obsession: The Nature and Treatment of Existential Obsessions and a Call for Research.

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jonathan S Abramowitz, Emily K Juel, Mujgan Inozu, Joseph B Friedman, Nicholas S Myers
{"title":"To Be or Not to Be-That Is the Obsession: The Nature and Treatment of Existential Obsessions and a Call for Research.","authors":"Jonathan S Abramowitz, Emily K Juel, Mujgan Inozu, Joseph B Friedman, Nicholas S Myers","doi":"10.1891/JCP-2025-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Existential obsessions-persistent, intrusive doubts about unanswerable questions such as the nature of reality, identity, free will, and death-are an understudied and underrecognized presentation of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although these symptoms align with core OCD features, their abstract and philosophical content distinguishes them from more commonly studied presentations. This article provides a conceptualization of existential obsessions, outlining their phenomenology, cognitive-behavioral underpinnings, and implications for assessment and treatment. We identify four primary content domains, namely, metaphysical, thanatological, ontological, and deterministic obsessions, and draw on established OCD models to explain their development and maintenance. Sociocultural and developmental influences are also highlighted. We then outline treatment recommendations based on the conceptual model and present a research agenda to address gaps in the literature, including the need for targeted assessment tools, empirical tests of proposed mechanisms, and treatment trials. Just as other manifestations of OCD have gained clarity through empirical study, existential obsessions merit scientific attention to enhance recognition and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2025-0014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existential obsessions-persistent, intrusive doubts about unanswerable questions such as the nature of reality, identity, free will, and death-are an understudied and underrecognized presentation of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although these symptoms align with core OCD features, their abstract and philosophical content distinguishes them from more commonly studied presentations. This article provides a conceptualization of existential obsessions, outlining their phenomenology, cognitive-behavioral underpinnings, and implications for assessment and treatment. We identify four primary content domains, namely, metaphysical, thanatological, ontological, and deterministic obsessions, and draw on established OCD models to explain their development and maintenance. Sociocultural and developmental influences are also highlighted. We then outline treatment recommendations based on the conceptual model and present a research agenda to address gaps in the literature, including the need for targeted assessment tools, empirical tests of proposed mechanisms, and treatment trials. Just as other manifestations of OCD have gained clarity through empirical study, existential obsessions merit scientific attention to enhance recognition and improve outcomes.

生存还是毁灭——这就是执念:存在主义执念的本质和治疗,以及对研究的呼吁。
存在主义强迫症——对现实的本质、身份、自由意志和死亡等无法回答的问题产生持续的、侵入性的怀疑——是强迫症(OCD)的一种未被充分研究和未被充分认识的表现。尽管这些症状与强迫症的核心特征一致,但它们的抽象和哲学内容将它们与更常见的研究表现区分开来。这篇文章提供了存在主义强迫症的概念化,概述了它们的现象学,认知行为基础,以及评估和治疗的含义。我们确定了四个主要的内容领域,即形而上的、死亡论的、本体论的和决定论的痴迷,并利用已建立的强迫症模型来解释它们的发展和维持。社会文化和发展的影响也很突出。然后,我们概述了基于概念模型的治疗建议,并提出了研究议程,以解决文献中的空白,包括对有针对性的评估工具的需求,对拟议机制的实证检验和治疗试验。正如强迫症的其他表现形式已经通过实证研究变得清晰一样,存在主义强迫症值得科学关注,以增强认知并改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy is devoted to advancing the science and clinical practice of cognitive-behavior therapy. This includes a range of interventions including cognitive therapy, rational-emotive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness approaches. The journal publishes empirical papers, including case studies, along with review articles, papers that integrate cognitive-behavior therapy with other systems, and practical "how to" articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信