Differentiating Scrupulosity and Religiosity: The Mediating Role of Fear of Self, Inferential Confusion, and Obsessive Beliefs in Mental and Contact Contamination.

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mujgan Inozu, Nicholas S Myers, Emily K Juel, Joseph B Friedman, Jonathan S Abramowitz
{"title":"Differentiating Scrupulosity and Religiosity: The Mediating Role of Fear of Self, Inferential Confusion, and Obsessive Beliefs in Mental and Contact Contamination.","authors":"Mujgan Inozu, Nicholas S Myers, Emily K Juel, Joseph B Friedman, Jonathan S Abramowitz","doi":"10.1891/JCP-2025-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the distinct roles of religiosity and scrupulosity in relation to cognitive factors-obsessive beliefs, fear of self, and inferential confusion-across contact and mental contamination (MC). Unlike prior research, it examines how religiosity and scrupulosity differentially predict contamination concerns through these cognitive factors. A sample of 235 undergraduates (83.4% female, <i>M</i> = 18.84 years) completed self-report measures assessing contamination types, scrupulosity, religiosity, fear of self, inferential confusion, and obsessive beliefs. Results showed that scrupulosity, compared with religiosity, was a stronger predictor of contamination, particularly MC, suggesting the importance of distinguishing between normative religious belief and pathological doubt. Fear of self and inferential confusion mediated the link between scrupulosity and MC, while inferential confusion alone mediated contact contamination. These findings highlight the distinct cognitive pathways underlying mental and contact contamination and emphasize the clinical relevance of targeting scrupulosity, fear of self, and inferential confusion-rather than religiosity-in interventions for contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms. Limitations include the sample's limited generalizability, cross-sectional design, and Western context, which may not fully capture cultural and religious influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JCP-2025-0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the distinct roles of religiosity and scrupulosity in relation to cognitive factors-obsessive beliefs, fear of self, and inferential confusion-across contact and mental contamination (MC). Unlike prior research, it examines how religiosity and scrupulosity differentially predict contamination concerns through these cognitive factors. A sample of 235 undergraduates (83.4% female, M = 18.84 years) completed self-report measures assessing contamination types, scrupulosity, religiosity, fear of self, inferential confusion, and obsessive beliefs. Results showed that scrupulosity, compared with religiosity, was a stronger predictor of contamination, particularly MC, suggesting the importance of distinguishing between normative religious belief and pathological doubt. Fear of self and inferential confusion mediated the link between scrupulosity and MC, while inferential confusion alone mediated contact contamination. These findings highlight the distinct cognitive pathways underlying mental and contact contamination and emphasize the clinical relevance of targeting scrupulosity, fear of self, and inferential confusion-rather than religiosity-in interventions for contamination-related obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms. Limitations include the sample's limited generalizability, cross-sectional design, and Western context, which may not fully capture cultural and religious influences.

区分严谨和虔诚:自我恐惧、推理混乱和强迫性信仰在精神污染和接触污染中的中介作用。
本研究探讨了宗教虔诚和严谨在认知因素(强迫性信仰、自我恐惧和推理混乱)与接触和精神污染(MC)之间的不同作用。与先前的研究不同,它通过这些认知因素考察了宗教虔诚度和严谨度如何不同地预测污染问题。235名大学生(83.4%为女性,M = 18.84岁)完成了自我报告测量,评估污染类型、谨小慎微、宗教虔诚、自我恐惧、推理混乱和强迫信仰。结果表明,与宗教信仰相比,严谨是一个更强的污染预测因子,尤其是MC,这表明区分规范的宗教信仰和病态的怀疑的重要性。自我恐惧和推理混乱介导了严谨和MC之间的联系,而推理混乱单独介导了接触污染。这些发现强调了精神污染和接触污染背后的独特认知途径,并强调了在干预污染相关强迫症症状时,针对谨慎、自我恐惧和推理混乱(而不是宗教信仰)的临床相关性。局限性包括样本有限的普遍性、横断面设计和西方背景,可能无法完全捕捉文化和宗教的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy is devoted to advancing the science and clinical practice of cognitive-behavior therapy. This includes a range of interventions including cognitive therapy, rational-emotive behavior therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and mindfulness approaches. The journal publishes empirical papers, including case studies, along with review articles, papers that integrate cognitive-behavior therapy with other systems, and practical "how to" articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信