Levator surgery with and without tarsectomy for correction of fair-function congenital ptosis: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.2 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-19 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_322_24
Mostafa M Diab, Taha A Ashraf Taha, Nada K Abdelsattar
{"title":"Levator surgery with and without tarsectomy for correction of fair-function congenital ptosis: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mostafa M Diab, Taha A Ashraf Taha, Nada K Abdelsattar","doi":"10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_322_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose is to compare the functional and cosmetic outcomes of levator resection with tarsoconjunctival mullerectomy (LR plus) versus modified LR (mLR) for correcting congenital ptosis with fair levator function (LF; 4-7 mm).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial, 34 children (aged 6-12 years old) with unilateral congenital ptosis and fair LF were randomized to LR plus (<i>n</i> = 16) or mLR group B (<i>n</i> = 18). Margin-reflex distance 1 (MRD1), LF, lagophthalmos, corneal staining (Miyata grading), eyelid crease, contour, and eyelash angle were assessed postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes were graded by an independent observer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated significant postoperative MRD1 improvements. In the LR plus group, MRD1 increased from 0.56 ± 1.09 mm to 3.44 ± 1.15 mm (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and while in the mLR group, it improved from 0.89 ± 1.18 mm to 4.06 ± 0.94 mm (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with no significant intergroup difference. The mLR group showed significantly greater LF improvement at all-time points (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with a 12-month LF of 11.28 ± 2.16 mm versus 7.38 ± 2.09 mm in the LR plus group. The mLR group had less lagophthalmos, corneal staining (early follow-up), and better eyelid contour at 3, 6, and 12 months. Eyelash ptosis was more frequently observed in the LR plus group. Complications occurred in 3 (18.8%) patients in the LR plus (including exposure keratopathy, recurrence, and suture-related corneal abrasion) and in 1 (5.6%) patient in the mLR group (overcorrection).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both LR plus and mLR are effective for the correction of congenital ptosis with fair LF. However, mLR yielded in greater LF improvement, less postoperative lagophthalmos and corneal complications, and better eyelid contour. Therefore, mLR may be the preferred surgical technique for this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":46810,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"39 2","pages":"148-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_322_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose is to compare the functional and cosmetic outcomes of levator resection with tarsoconjunctival mullerectomy (LR plus) versus modified LR (mLR) for correcting congenital ptosis with fair levator function (LF; 4-7 mm).

Methods: In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial, 34 children (aged 6-12 years old) with unilateral congenital ptosis and fair LF were randomized to LR plus (n = 16) or mLR group B (n = 18). Margin-reflex distance 1 (MRD1), LF, lagophthalmos, corneal staining (Miyata grading), eyelid crease, contour, and eyelash angle were assessed postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes were graded by an independent observer.

Results: Both groups demonstrated significant postoperative MRD1 improvements. In the LR plus group, MRD1 increased from 0.56 ± 1.09 mm to 3.44 ± 1.15 mm (P < 0.001), and while in the mLR group, it improved from 0.89 ± 1.18 mm to 4.06 ± 0.94 mm (P < 0.001), with no significant intergroup difference. The mLR group showed significantly greater LF improvement at all-time points (P < 0.001), with a 12-month LF of 11.28 ± 2.16 mm versus 7.38 ± 2.09 mm in the LR plus group. The mLR group had less lagophthalmos, corneal staining (early follow-up), and better eyelid contour at 3, 6, and 12 months. Eyelash ptosis was more frequently observed in the LR plus group. Complications occurred in 3 (18.8%) patients in the LR plus (including exposure keratopathy, recurrence, and suture-related corneal abrasion) and in 1 (5.6%) patient in the mLR group (overcorrection).

Conclusion: Both LR plus and mLR are effective for the correction of congenital ptosis with fair LF. However, mLR yielded in greater LF improvement, less postoperative lagophthalmos and corneal complications, and better eyelid contour. Therefore, mLR may be the preferred surgical technique for this condition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

提肛手术伴和不伴跗骨切除术矫正先天性先天性上睑下垂:一项随机对照试验。
目的:比较提上睑肌切除术联合跗结膜乳突切除术(LR +)与改良LR (mLR)矫正先天性上睑下垂的功能和美容效果。4 - 7毫米)。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲试验中,34名(6-12岁)单侧先天性上睑下垂和轻度LF的儿童(n = 16)随机分为LR +组(n = 16)或mLR B组(n = 18)。术后1、3、6、12个月分别评估边缘反射距离1 (MRD1)、LF、眼球lagophthalmmos、角膜染色(Miyata分级)、眼睑折痕、轮廓和睫毛角度。结果由独立观察者评分。结果:两组术后MRD1均有明显改善。LR +组MRD1由0.56±1.09 mm升高至3.44±1.15 mm (P < 0.001), mLR组MRD1由0.89±1.18 mm升高至4.06±0.94 mm (P < 0.001),组间差异无统计学意义。mLR组在所有时间点上表现出更大的LF改善(P < 0.001), 12个月的LF为11.28±2.16 mm,而LR加组为7.38±2.09 mm。mLR组在3个月、6个月和12个月时的眼lageye、角膜染色(早期随访)较少,眼睑轮廓较好。LR +组睫毛下垂发生率更高。LR +组有3例(18.8%)患者出现并发症(包括暴露性角膜病变、复发和缝合线相关性角膜磨损),mLR组有1例(5.6%)患者出现并发症(过度矫正)。结论:LR +和mLR均可有效矫正先天性上睑下垂伴轻度下睑下垂。然而,mLR改善了LF,减少了术后lageyes和角膜并发症,改善了眼睑轮廓。因此,mLR可能是治疗这种疾病的首选手术技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of ophthalmology. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology publishes original papers, clinical studies, reviews and case reports. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology is the official publication of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信