3D Printed Models of Periarticular Fractures of the Shoulder and Elbow Improve Surgical Decision Making in Orthopedic Trainees.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Pedro Beredjiklian, Brianna Fram, Jason Core, Joshua I Ng, Robert Pugliese, Stephanie A Kwan, Michael Rivlin
{"title":"3D Printed Models of Periarticular Fractures of the Shoulder and Elbow Improve Surgical Decision Making in Orthopedic Trainees.","authors":"Pedro Beredjiklian, Brianna Fram, Jason Core, Joshua I Ng, Robert Pugliese, Stephanie A Kwan, Michael Rivlin","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2024.81232.3707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Periarticular fractures of the shoulder and elbow are spatially complex injuries that may be challenging to interpret on radiographs and advanced imaging. As three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has become less expensive and more available, 3D printed fracture models have gained attention for use in surgical preparation. In this study, we evaluated the effects of 3D printed fracture models on orthopedic trainee surgical planning and injury understanding for injuries of the shoulder and elbow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Models of periarticular fractures of the shoulder and elbow were manufactured by 3D printing at the medical school design lab. Eleven Orthopedic trainees viewed X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans for each injury, and completed a preoperative questionnaires. They were then given access to the 3D model of each injury, in addition to the previously viewed imaging. They again completed a preoperative plan and questionnaire. Preoperative plans were graded for feasibility by a preestablished template. Results were compared for each participant with and without the 3D models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within all trainees and fractures, trainees were more likely to have feasible preoperative plans when given a 3D model, compared to access to x-rays and CT scans alone (74% vs. 62%). In all cases where preoperative plans were changed after handling the 3D models (46/77 changed, 60%), they stayed static or improved in feasibility. Participants reported significantly improved understanding of injury anatomy (P<0.0001), increased confidence in choosing operative positioning and surgical approaches (P<0.0001), desired implants (P=0.011), and better conceptualization of how to perform fracture reduction (P=0.0038).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orthopedic trainees benefit from 3D printed fracture models when performing preoperative planning of complex periarticular shoulder and elbow injuries. Given the rarity and difficulty of these injuries, use of this technology could allow for shortened learning curves and improved surgical results in the field of orthopedic fracture care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 6","pages":"337-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2024.81232.3707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Periarticular fractures of the shoulder and elbow are spatially complex injuries that may be challenging to interpret on radiographs and advanced imaging. As three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has become less expensive and more available, 3D printed fracture models have gained attention for use in surgical preparation. In this study, we evaluated the effects of 3D printed fracture models on orthopedic trainee surgical planning and injury understanding for injuries of the shoulder and elbow.

Methods: Models of periarticular fractures of the shoulder and elbow were manufactured by 3D printing at the medical school design lab. Eleven Orthopedic trainees viewed X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans for each injury, and completed a preoperative questionnaires. They were then given access to the 3D model of each injury, in addition to the previously viewed imaging. They again completed a preoperative plan and questionnaire. Preoperative plans were graded for feasibility by a preestablished template. Results were compared for each participant with and without the 3D models.

Results: Within all trainees and fractures, trainees were more likely to have feasible preoperative plans when given a 3D model, compared to access to x-rays and CT scans alone (74% vs. 62%). In all cases where preoperative plans were changed after handling the 3D models (46/77 changed, 60%), they stayed static or improved in feasibility. Participants reported significantly improved understanding of injury anatomy (P<0.0001), increased confidence in choosing operative positioning and surgical approaches (P<0.0001), desired implants (P=0.011), and better conceptualization of how to perform fracture reduction (P=0.0038).

Conclusion: Orthopedic trainees benefit from 3D printed fracture models when performing preoperative planning of complex periarticular shoulder and elbow injuries. Given the rarity and difficulty of these injuries, use of this technology could allow for shortened learning curves and improved surgical results in the field of orthopedic fracture care.

肩关节周围骨折和肘关节周围骨折的3D打印模型改善骨科学员的手术决策。
目的:肩关节周围骨折和肘关节周围骨折是空间复杂的损伤,可能在x线片和高级影像学上具有挑战性。随着三维(3D)打印技术变得更便宜和更容易获得,3D打印骨折模型在手术准备中的应用受到了关注。在本研究中,我们评估了3D打印骨折模型对骨科学员肩部和肘部损伤的手术计划和损伤理解的影响。方法:采用3D打印技术在医学院设计实验室制作肩关节周围骨折和肘关节周围骨折模型。11名骨科实习生对每个损伤进行了x光和计算机断层扫描,并完成了术前问卷调查。然后,除了之前看到的图像外,他们还可以看到每个损伤的3D模型。他们再次完成术前计划和问卷调查。术前计划通过预先建立的模板进行可行性评分。对每个参与者使用和不使用3D模型的结果进行比较。结果:在所有的受术者和骨折中,与单独获得x射线和CT扫描相比,给予3D模型的受术者更有可能制定可行的术前计划(74%对62%)。在处理3D模型后改变术前计划的所有病例中(46/77,60%),术前计划保持不变或提高了可行性。参与者报告对损伤解剖的理解有了显著提高(结论:骨科学员在进行复杂肩关节周围和肘关节损伤的术前规划时受益于3D打印骨折模型。鉴于这些损伤的罕见性和难治性,使用该技术可以缩短学习曲线,提高骨科骨折护理领域的手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信