SBC-SHAP: Increasing the Accessibility and Interpretability of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sepsis Prediction.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Daniel Walke, Daniel Steinbach, Thorsten Kaiser, Alexander Schönhuth, Gunter Saake, David Broneske, Robert Heyer
{"title":"SBC-SHAP: Increasing the Accessibility and Interpretability of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sepsis Prediction.","authors":"Daniel Walke, Daniel Steinbach, Thorsten Kaiser, Alexander Schönhuth, Gunter Saake, David Broneske, Robert Heyer","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that is one of the major causes of death worldwide. Early detection of sepsis is required for fast initialization of an appropriate therapy. Complete blood count data containing information about white blood cells, platelets, hemoglobin, red blood cells, and mean corpuscular volume could serve as early indicators. However, previous approaches are limited by their interpretability (i.e., investigating the influence of feature values on individual predictions) and accessibility (i.e., easy accessibility for clinicians without programming expertise).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a graph-based approach for training machine learning (ML) algorithms to incorporate time-series information for prediction based on complete blood count data. Additionally, we investigated the effect of integrating different ratios to a healthy reference measurement to improve the performance of the previously published ML model. Finally, we developed a web application based on our approaches to increase accessibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While it was irrelevant how exactly the ratio was formed, our approach increased the sensitivity at 80% specificity across all ML models from up to 78.2% to up to 82.9% on an internal dataset (i.e., same tertiary care center) and from 65.4% to 73.4% on an external dataset (i.e., independent tertiary care center) for prospective time-series analysis. Additionally, we propose SBC-SHAP (https://mdoa-tools.bi.denbi.de/sbc-shap), a web application that visualizes the sepsis risks and individual interpretations of several ML classifiers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We are confident that this tool will increase the interpretability and accessibility of ML models for predicting sepsis based on complete blood count data. SBC-SHAP is open-sourced on https://github.com/danielwalke/sbc_app.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1226-1240"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that is one of the major causes of death worldwide. Early detection of sepsis is required for fast initialization of an appropriate therapy. Complete blood count data containing information about white blood cells, platelets, hemoglobin, red blood cells, and mean corpuscular volume could serve as early indicators. However, previous approaches are limited by their interpretability (i.e., investigating the influence of feature values on individual predictions) and accessibility (i.e., easy accessibility for clinicians without programming expertise).

Methods: We developed a graph-based approach for training machine learning (ML) algorithms to incorporate time-series information for prediction based on complete blood count data. Additionally, we investigated the effect of integrating different ratios to a healthy reference measurement to improve the performance of the previously published ML model. Finally, we developed a web application based on our approaches to increase accessibility.

Results: While it was irrelevant how exactly the ratio was formed, our approach increased the sensitivity at 80% specificity across all ML models from up to 78.2% to up to 82.9% on an internal dataset (i.e., same tertiary care center) and from 65.4% to 73.4% on an external dataset (i.e., independent tertiary care center) for prospective time-series analysis. Additionally, we propose SBC-SHAP (https://mdoa-tools.bi.denbi.de/sbc-shap), a web application that visualizes the sepsis risks and individual interpretations of several ML classifiers.

Conclusions: We are confident that this tool will increase the interpretability and accessibility of ML models for predicting sepsis based on complete blood count data. SBC-SHAP is open-sourced on https://github.com/danielwalke/sbc_app.

SBC-SHAP:提高败血症预测机器学习算法的可访问性和可解释性。
背景:脓毒症是一种危及生命的疾病,是世界范围内死亡的主要原因之一。早期发现败血症是快速初始化适当治疗的必要条件。全血细胞计数数据包含白细胞、血小板、血红蛋白、红细胞和平均红细胞体积等信息,可作为早期指标。然而,以前的方法受到其可解释性(即,调查特征值对个体预测的影响)和可访问性(即,没有编程专业知识的临床医生易于访问)的限制。方法:我们开发了一种基于图的方法来训练机器学习(ML)算法,以结合时间序列信息进行基于全血细胞计数数据的预测。此外,我们还研究了将不同比率整合到健康参考测量中的效果,以提高先前发表的ML模型的性能。最后,我们根据我们的方法开发了一个web应用程序来增加可访问性。结果:虽然该比率的确切形成方式与此无关,但我们的方法将所有ML模型的敏感度提高了80%,特异性从内部数据集(即同一三级医疗中心)的78.2%提高到82.9%,从外部数据集(即独立三级医疗中心)的65.4%提高到73.4%。此外,我们提出SBC-SHAP (https://mdoa-tools.bi.denbi.de/sbc-shap),这是一个web应用程序,可以可视化脓毒症风险和几个ML分类器的个人解释。结论:我们相信该工具将提高ML模型的可解释性和可及性,用于基于全血细胞计数数据预测败血症。SBC-SHAP是在https://github.com/danielwalke/sbc_app上开源的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信