Stress to stability: Sense of coherence as a buffer against pandemic-related psychological distress.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health SA Gesondheid Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2859
Anita Padmanabhanunni, Tyrone B Pretorius
{"title":"Stress to stability: Sense of coherence as a buffer against pandemic-related psychological distress.","authors":"Anita Padmanabhanunni, Tyrone B Pretorius","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying protective factors in mental health-related outcomes is crucial, offering insights into the vulnerabilities and strengths individuals harness against psychological distress. There has been limited focus on exploring complex mediation and moderation models, which can uncover the relationships between stressors, protective factors and wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated the interrelationship between perceived stress, sense of coherence (SOC), and psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>South African university students (<i>N</i> = 322) completed the Perceived Stress Scale, Sense of Coherence Scale-13, Beck Hopelessness Scale-9 and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale-10.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Moderation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro to examine the role of SOC in moderating the relationship between perceived stress and psychological distress. Where moderation was not significant, mediation analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sense of coherence demonstrated multiple roles in mental health, exhibiting direct effects on indicators of psychological distress. Sense of coherence moderated the relationship between perceived stress and hopelessness. Under heightened stress conditions, individuals with low to medium SOC displayed more profound feelings of hopelessness compared to those with high SOC. Mediation analysis showed that SOC served as a bridge between perceived stress and both depression and anxiety. The identification of a potential SOC threshold offers a novel perspective on assessing risk levels, suggesting that individuals with low to moderate SOC are particularly vulnerable under high stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings emphasise the need for targeted approaches to strengthen SOC as a resilience-enhancing factor.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study advances theoretical discussions on stress-buffering models and offers guidance for mental health practitioners working in high-stress environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":"30 ","pages":"2859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identifying protective factors in mental health-related outcomes is crucial, offering insights into the vulnerabilities and strengths individuals harness against psychological distress. There has been limited focus on exploring complex mediation and moderation models, which can uncover the relationships between stressors, protective factors and wellbeing.

Aim: This study investigated the interrelationship between perceived stress, sense of coherence (SOC), and psychological distress.

Setting: South African university students (N = 322) completed the Perceived Stress Scale, Sense of Coherence Scale-13, Beck Hopelessness Scale-9 and Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale-10.

Methods: Moderation analysis was conducted using the PROCESS macro to examine the role of SOC in moderating the relationship between perceived stress and psychological distress. Where moderation was not significant, mediation analysis was conducted.

Results: Sense of coherence demonstrated multiple roles in mental health, exhibiting direct effects on indicators of psychological distress. Sense of coherence moderated the relationship between perceived stress and hopelessness. Under heightened stress conditions, individuals with low to medium SOC displayed more profound feelings of hopelessness compared to those with high SOC. Mediation analysis showed that SOC served as a bridge between perceived stress and both depression and anxiety. The identification of a potential SOC threshold offers a novel perspective on assessing risk levels, suggesting that individuals with low to moderate SOC are particularly vulnerable under high stress.

Conclusion: The findings emphasise the need for targeted approaches to strengthen SOC as a resilience-enhancing factor.

Contribution: The study advances theoretical discussions on stress-buffering models and offers guidance for mental health practitioners working in high-stress environments.

对稳定的压力:作为缓冲与大流行有关的心理困扰的连贯感。
背景:确定心理健康相关结果的保护因素至关重要,可以深入了解个体应对心理困扰的脆弱性和优势。对复杂的调解和调节模型的探索一直很有限,这些模型可以揭示压力源、保护因素和幸福感之间的关系。目的:探讨应激感知、连贯感(SOC)与心理困扰的关系。背景:南非大学生(N = 322)完成了压力感知量表、一致性量表13、贝克绝望量表9和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表10。方法:采用PROCESS宏观进行调节分析,考察SOC在感知压力与心理困扰关系中的调节作用。当适度不显著时,进行中介分析。结果:连贯感在心理健康中表现出多重作用,对心理困扰指标有直接影响。连贯感缓和了感知压力和绝望之间的关系。在高压力条件下,中低SOC个体比高SOC个体表现出更深刻的绝望感。中介分析显示,SOC在感知压力与抑郁、焦虑之间起桥梁作用。潜在SOC阈值的识别为评估风险水平提供了一种新的视角,表明低至中等SOC的个体在高压力下特别脆弱。结论:研究结果强调需要有针对性的方法来加强SOC作为增强弹性的因素。贡献:促进压力缓冲模型的理论探讨,为高压力环境下的心理健康工作者提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信