{"title":"Inequality in Health Insurance Coverage in a Pluralistic Health Insurance System: Evidence From India.","authors":"Pragyan Monalisa Sahoo, Himanshu Sekhar Rout","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent inequality in financial protection mechanisms in healthcare continues to be a major challenge within India's pluralistic health insurance system, disproportionately disadvantaging marginalised groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study uses NFHS 4 and 5 household data to investigate inequality in health insurance coverage prevalence and transition across socioeconomic and demographic strata. It categorises health insurance coverage based on the number and type of coverage, considering factors such as the provider, pooling mechanism, and target population. We employ descriptive statistics and the concentration index to assess the prevalence of health insurance coverage. To delve deeper into the factors influencing enrolment in different types of coverage, we created 24 mutually exclusive groups at the intersection of sex-income-marriage-caste. These categories, along with other explanatory variables, are analysed for their influence on the enrolment of coverage using multinomial logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the proportion of health insurance coverage increased from NFHS 4 to NFHS 5, 59.01% of the sample population still lacked coverage, indicating insufficient progress. Both surveys reveal significant disparities in coverage based on state-level, social, economic, and demographic factors. While the role of social and demographic determinants remains relatively modest, the distributional gradient of insurance prevalence across economic strata and state categories was high. India's pluralistic health insurance system has resulted in the population being covered under different coverage mechanisms. However, among these various types of coverage, the majority of sample households were only single, predominantly under SHI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study investigated disparities in health insurance coverage across various social, economic, and demographic segments in India, revealing that inequalities are influenced by a combination of state-level, socioeconomic, and demographic factors. These findings call for a unified and inclusive health financing framework that can address systemic fragmentation. Moving towards a 'One Nation, One Insurance' model offers a transformative pathway to ensure equitable, efficient, and universal health coverage for all Indians. Addressing these determinants presents potential policy tools for improving coverage imbalances, thereby offering opportunities for targeted interventions to mitigate disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Persistent inequality in financial protection mechanisms in healthcare continues to be a major challenge within India's pluralistic health insurance system, disproportionately disadvantaging marginalised groups.
Methods: Our study uses NFHS 4 and 5 household data to investigate inequality in health insurance coverage prevalence and transition across socioeconomic and demographic strata. It categorises health insurance coverage based on the number and type of coverage, considering factors such as the provider, pooling mechanism, and target population. We employ descriptive statistics and the concentration index to assess the prevalence of health insurance coverage. To delve deeper into the factors influencing enrolment in different types of coverage, we created 24 mutually exclusive groups at the intersection of sex-income-marriage-caste. These categories, along with other explanatory variables, are analysed for their influence on the enrolment of coverage using multinomial logistic regression models.
Results: Although the proportion of health insurance coverage increased from NFHS 4 to NFHS 5, 59.01% of the sample population still lacked coverage, indicating insufficient progress. Both surveys reveal significant disparities in coverage based on state-level, social, economic, and demographic factors. While the role of social and demographic determinants remains relatively modest, the distributional gradient of insurance prevalence across economic strata and state categories was high. India's pluralistic health insurance system has resulted in the population being covered under different coverage mechanisms. However, among these various types of coverage, the majority of sample households were only single, predominantly under SHI.
Conclusions: The study investigated disparities in health insurance coverage across various social, economic, and demographic segments in India, revealing that inequalities are influenced by a combination of state-level, socioeconomic, and demographic factors. These findings call for a unified and inclusive health financing framework that can address systemic fragmentation. Moving towards a 'One Nation, One Insurance' model offers a transformative pathway to ensure equitable, efficient, and universal health coverage for all Indians. Addressing these determinants presents potential policy tools for improving coverage imbalances, thereby offering opportunities for targeted interventions to mitigate disparities.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.