The Male Gaze Explored: Ranking Thinness and Attractiveness of Female Body Shapes.

Q2 Psychology
Journal for Person-Oriented Research Pub Date : 2025-06-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.17505/jpor.2025.28095
Revital Naor-Ziv, Yaarit Amram-Veitz, Joseph Glicksohn
{"title":"The Male Gaze Explored: Ranking Thinness and Attractiveness of Female Body Shapes.","authors":"Revital Naor-Ziv, Yaarit Amram-Veitz, Joseph Glicksohn","doi":"10.17505/jpor.2025.28095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The male gaze of the female body image in terms of thinness reveals its hierarchical structure: first torso, then legs, then arms. This is seen when in one task our male participants rank-ordered 8 composite images of a female body, derived from a Torso (thin vs. large) × Leg (thin/large vs. medium) × Arm (thin vs. large) design, from thinnest to largest. This primary focus on the torso is also critical in determining to what degree the female body image conforms to a desired hourglass shape. In a second task, the participants rank-ordered the same images from least attractive to most attractive. The rank-ordering of thinness was not readily predictive of the rank-ordering of attractiveness, and we found no clear end-structure underlying the female body image in terms of attractiveness. Nevertheless, in tracing the process of rating attractiveness, we can anchor the two ends of the series. The most attractive shapes were either Image 4 or Image 3, both instantiating a low waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). The first two choices for the least attractive shape were Image 1 (very thin) and Image 6 (very large). Great variability was found, however, in ranking the other body shapes, comprising composite images displaying an incompatibility of their various body parts. This results in a large number of paths for defining what attractiveness is for a particular male participant.</p>","PeriodicalId":36744,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Person-Oriented Research","volume":"11 2","pages":"96-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Person-Oriented Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2025.28095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The male gaze of the female body image in terms of thinness reveals its hierarchical structure: first torso, then legs, then arms. This is seen when in one task our male participants rank-ordered 8 composite images of a female body, derived from a Torso (thin vs. large) × Leg (thin/large vs. medium) × Arm (thin vs. large) design, from thinnest to largest. This primary focus on the torso is also critical in determining to what degree the female body image conforms to a desired hourglass shape. In a second task, the participants rank-ordered the same images from least attractive to most attractive. The rank-ordering of thinness was not readily predictive of the rank-ordering of attractiveness, and we found no clear end-structure underlying the female body image in terms of attractiveness. Nevertheless, in tracing the process of rating attractiveness, we can anchor the two ends of the series. The most attractive shapes were either Image 4 or Image 3, both instantiating a low waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). The first two choices for the least attractive shape were Image 1 (very thin) and Image 6 (very large). Great variability was found, however, in ranking the other body shapes, comprising composite images displaying an incompatibility of their various body parts. This results in a large number of paths for defining what attractiveness is for a particular male participant.

男性凝视的探索:女性身材的瘦度和吸引力排序。
男性对女性身体形象的关注揭示了其等级结构:首先是躯干,然后是腿,然后是手臂。在一项任务中,我们的男性参与者对8张女性身体的合成图像进行排序,这些图像来自躯干(瘦vs大)×腿(瘦/大vs中)×手臂(瘦vs大)的设计,从最薄到最大。在决定女性身体形象在多大程度上符合理想的沙漏形时,对躯干的主要关注也是至关重要的。在第二项任务中,参与者对相同的图片从最不吸引人到最吸引人进行排序。瘦的排序不能很容易地预测吸引力的排序,我们发现在吸引力方面,女性身体形象没有明确的末端结构。然而,在追踪吸引力评级的过程中,我们可以锚定这个系列的两端。最吸引人的身材是图4或图3,两者都体现了低腰臀比(WHR)。最不吸引人的形状的前两个选择是图1(非常薄)和图6(非常大)。然而,在对其他身体形状进行排序时,发现了很大的差异,这些形状由合成图像组成,显示出不同身体部位的不相容。这就产生了大量的途径来定义一个特定的男性参与者的吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Person-Oriented Research
Journal for Person-Oriented Research Psychology-Psychology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信