Narratives in the nascent policy subsystem of AI biometrics.

Q2 Social Sciences
Patrick A Stewart, Jeffrey K Mullins, Thomas J Greitens
{"title":"Narratives in the nascent policy subsystem of AI biometrics.","authors":"Patrick A Stewart, Jeffrey K Mullins, Thomas J Greitens","doi":"10.1017/pls.2025.10006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Biden administration requested comments regarding \"Public and Private Sector Uses of Biometric Technologies\" in the Federal Register from October 2021 to January 2022. This generated 130 responses, helped shape the \"Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights,\" and resulted in Executive Order 14110 on \"Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.\" While the Trump administration immediately rescinded this executive order, these comments provide insight into salient AI biometrics technologies and relevant political players. We first identify AI biometric technologies before asking which institutions and individuals commented (RQ1), and what the substance and tenor of responses were regarding the opportunities and threats posed by AI biometrics (RQ2-a) based on respondent type (RQ2-b). We use text mining and qualitative analyses to illuminate how uncertainty about AI biometric technology in this nascent policy subsystem reflects participants' language use and policy preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":35901,"journal":{"name":"Politics and the Life Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and the Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2025.10006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Biden administration requested comments regarding "Public and Private Sector Uses of Biometric Technologies" in the Federal Register from October 2021 to January 2022. This generated 130 responses, helped shape the "Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights," and resulted in Executive Order 14110 on "Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence." While the Trump administration immediately rescinded this executive order, these comments provide insight into salient AI biometrics technologies and relevant political players. We first identify AI biometric technologies before asking which institutions and individuals commented (RQ1), and what the substance and tenor of responses were regarding the opportunities and threats posed by AI biometrics (RQ2-a) based on respondent type (RQ2-b). We use text mining and qualitative analyses to illuminate how uncertainty about AI biometric technology in this nascent policy subsystem reflects participants' language use and policy preferences.

人工智能生物识别的新生政策子系统的叙述。
拜登政府要求在2021年10月至2022年1月期间在《联邦公报》上就“公共和私营部门使用生物识别技术”发表评论。这产生了130个回应,帮助形成了“人工智能权利法案蓝图”,并产生了关于“安全,可靠和可信赖的人工智能开发和使用”的第14110号行政命令。虽然特朗普政府立即撤销了这一行政命令,但这些言论让人们了解了人工智能生物识别技术和相关政治人物。我们首先确定人工智能生物识别技术,然后询问哪些机构和个人发表了评论(RQ1),以及根据受访者类型(RQ2-b),关于人工智能生物识别技术(RQ2-a)带来的机会和威胁,回应的实质和基调是什么。我们使用文本挖掘和定性分析来阐明人工智能生物识别技术在这个新生的政策子系统中的不确定性如何反映参与者的语言使用和政策偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politics and the Life Sciences
Politics and the Life Sciences Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: POLITICS AND THE LIFE SCIENCES is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal with a global audience. PLS is owned and published by the ASSOCIATION FOR POLITICS AND THE LIFE SCIENCES, the APLS, which is both an American Political Science Association (APSA) Related Group and an American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS) Member Society. The PLS topic range is exceptionally broad: evolutionary and laboratory insights into political behavior, including political violence, from group conflict to war, terrorism, and torture; political analysis of life-sciences research, health policy, environmental policy, and biosecurity policy; and philosophical analysis of life-sciences problems, such as bioethical controversies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信